1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What Should We Spend Out MLE On Now?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by matty101, Jul 30, 2008.

Tags:
  1. matty101

    matty101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    4
    Now that we have Artest, who is going to play minutes at the 4, should we still be wasteing our time chasing Landry and playing games with his management? I mean, it sounds like he has a pretty shakey knee, we already have Scola, Hayes, Dorsey and now Artest, so should we be going after another position?

    To be honest, and im extremely happy to say it, im not really sure what we need anymore. People say we need an upgrade at the point, but if Rafer shoots 36% plus from 3 point land next year than he is more than suitable for the job. And realistically, what other PGs out there would you want?

    I'd hate to see Landry prosper somewhere else, but im just not sure he is worth the trouble anymore.

    Or, another spin on it, do we now just throw the whole MLE at him? as i said im not sure how else it could be spent so throwing the whole thing at him might be the best option. IF he keeps developing it could very well be a good deal however if his knees are bung it might blow up in our faces.

    So what tye of player should we be going after now? Im thinking another shooter but i really dno. Or is Landry still worth waiting for? Or should we just throw he whole MLE at him?
     
  2. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,612
    Likes Received:
    12,002
    If the Rockets decide to change tactics on Landry (one way or the other):

    1 Definitely DO NOT give Landry the full MLE. That would be crazy.

    2 I can't think of one, but if there is a PG on the open market the Rockets want, they could go that direction. After that, perhaps another backup C instead of Deke. They don't need to pursue another PF/SF/SG with the MLE if they turn away from Landry. Tracy/Shane/RonRon/Scola/(Dorsey)/(Barry) plus scrubs is enough.

    I really hope Morey can upgrade at PG, but the Rockets may value Rafer's continuity with Artest coming on board.
     
  3. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    Give Landry part of the MLE, save the rest.
     
  4. matty101

    matty101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    4
    I totally agree. I think his value to the team has gone up now with artest becasue we dont need a defensive or scoring pg. All we need now is a steady pg who can knock down a decent amount of his 3's and this is somethign that think rafer can do.

    The only PG out there id be interested in is Hinrich bit his contract is too big so i say go to war with Alston and brooks. We now have Barry who can step in there as well and McGrady has always looked comfortable initiaing the offense so i dont see a problem with having him play the 1 for stretches in the game.
     
  5. Pete the Cheat

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,100
    Likes Received:
    487
    I don't really see our stradegy with Landry changing that much...granted, we now have some additional leverage with Artest able to play the 4.

    but there really isn't anyone on the market who jumps out at you for MLE money:
    I guess JR Smith could still be in discussion. but then we'd have a logjam at the 2/3 (not necessarilly a bad thing).
    Jannero Pargo is an interesting name, but he is more offensive minded rather than a table setting pg.


    if things fall through with Landry, I would not be opposed to sitting on the MLE and crossing my fingers someone worthwhile gets cut during the course of the season.

    or Les could pony of for Uncle Deke and help him build another wing for his hospital...
     
  6. RocketsMAN!

    RocketsMAN! Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    204
    1st, we're not going to just throw away our MLE. Morey's not that dumb as you can see. Secondly, Landry's still only going to get what he deserves from the Rocket's perspective until that knee is examined. With Bobby gone, our backup PG issue resurfaces unless we have Barry play there often, which is possible. We've still got Brooks, who may be ready to make the move to more minutes, plus we're getting a PG from Sacto. The question if this was the "minor" trade that Morey was hinting about! :)
     
  7. Jacquescas

    Jacquescas Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    2
    we get an MLE every year and it expires every year there is no point in saving it. I say at this point Landry on a full MLE deal is pretty solid. He would add so much depth to the front court that we need to get to that championship level.

    There isn't anything else out there and he is our 2nd best scoring 4. why not.
     
  8. LFE171

    LFE171 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    19
    why not janero pargo? he was hitting some pretty important shots in the playoffs. im too lazy to look up the stats but i was somewhat impressed. I'm sure we can get him for a piece of that MLE
     
  9. DreamYaoTmac5

    DreamYaoTmac5 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would def be down with getting Pargo, he is better than Alston. I don't think the Rockets are interested in him though :(
     
  10. ShiniKashi

    ShiniKashi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,738
    Likes Received:
    240
    SF3 for PG? maybe a pipe dream?
     
  11. matty101

    matty101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    4
    that list looks interesting. I wouldnt mind some sort of combination of JR Smith and maybe someone along the lines of Lorenzen Wright to help bolser the front court. Janero Pargo looks nice as well and he ahs burned te rockets a few times but i dont think he is valu for money because IIRC he wants a fair payout, smeting along the lines of the MLE or just below. Id uch rather have 2 players such as Smith and Wright rather than just Pargo.
     
  12. QdoubleA

    QdoubleA Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    256
    I am praying that we get some good veteran ring chasers like boston did last year. I know we're weak at the 1 and 4 but I never see anybody mention our backup center troubles. I love Mutumbo to death and his D but I'd like to see somebody who can put up more than 4 points.
     
  13. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    Partial MLE to Landry for short years (2 to 3, especially if he refuses scope).

    If a player wants to join on the cheap for a chance to win, sign him. Otherwise, don't spend it. We're in Luxury Tax land, and need to keep what flexibility we can for the RIGHT move to put us over the top.

    Spending it just cause we have it is a bad idea. A poor decision is not a 'nothing ventured nothing gained' situation - it sets us back.

    Evan
     
  14. matty101

    matty101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    4
    Francisco Elson and Walter Hermann are 2 other names that come to mind for frontcourt depth, however emjohn might be right. Sitting on it and waiting for the right move is probably the best thing to do rather than rush in and make a poor decision.
     
  15. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Don't think the plan with Landry changed one iota. Whether there are minutes for him or not, Landry is an asset if you can sign him to a reasonable contract. So, the plan remains to either (1) match any NBA non-ridiculous offer or (2) hold on to his rights by making the qualifying offer if he goes to Europe for a year.

    With the current depth of the Rockets (even before Artest was acquired, but especially now), there is great need that can be filled by a FA on the market available for the MLE or less.

    I figure, even without Landry and Mutombo, the main rotations are going to be:

    Yao, Scola, McGrady, Artest, Alston, Battier, Barry, Hayes (sub in Landry for him if Landry signs), Brooks.

    [That leaves guys like Luther Head, Mike Harris, Steve Novak (if he stays), Dorsey, etc. and MAYBE Hayes and Mutombo playing spot minutes outside of the rotation. ]

    I just don't know if there is any one on the FA market that fits the team needs better than the current projected top 8-9 guys. And the guys outside of the regular rotation are competent fill-ins, particularly for their price.
     
  16. mw_mw

    mw_mw Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    1
    backup C and PG?
     
  17. mms

    mms Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    25
    We still need a backup C. Elson is a good choice.
     
  18. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,258
    Likes Received:
    14,700
    If Deke refuses to come here,I wouldn't mind splitting the MLE between a healthy Landry and him. Elson will probably sign with some other team before Deke makes his decision IMO.
     
  19. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    Sign JR Smith and then trade Battier for a better pg?
     
  20. steddinotayto

    steddinotayto Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    19,116
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    I'd try and split it between Elson (if Deke don't come back) and Pargo. That would give us major major depth.
     

Share This Page