1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What if Bush wasn't lying and it was faulty intel?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by FranchiseBlade, Jun 4, 2003.

Tags:
  1. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,782
    Likes Received:
    20,441
    Intel regarding Saddams Bunker: Wrong

    Intel regarding Iraqi Nukes: Wrong

    Intel regarding Saddam and 9/11: Wrong

    Intel regarding top sites of WMD: Wrong

    Intel regarding WMD being handed out to Iraqi commanders to use on troops: Wrong

    Intel on initial reportos of Chem weapons being found: Wrong

    Intel on WMD being able to be readied and used by Iraqis in 45 min.: Wrong

    The list goes on and on, but suppose none of these examples were lies, and all of them simply faulty intel. If that's true, then the case has been made to NEVER go to war based on U.S. and allied intel only.

    This is the biggest argument for letting the inspections continue to work. The inspections might have eventually shown the error of so many pieces of bad intel, and prevented a war predicated on the U.S. being threatened by Saddam's WMD.

    So many people scoffed at weapons inspection teams, because they didn't find anything, and called the UN process a waste of time. Now many of the anti-war crowd on this very board seem to be saying that U.S. intel was wrong. So perhaps the incompetent party here was the U.S. and not the UN. Had the UN had time they have actually been able to correct the faulty intel.

    So it seems either the UN was the best method, or the U.S. was dishonest in the case presented.
     
  2. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    You obviously don't understand why the UN inspectors went to Iraq. They did not go to search for WMD.

    Most of you guys are so damn ignorant concerning this subject that I won't waste my time tonight.
     
  3. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,782
    Likes Received:
    20,441
    Did I say they went to search for WMD? They were there to see that Saddam was complying with UN resolutions. That doesn't mean that they couldn't have corrected some of the 'faulty intel.'
     
  4. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    Wow. What a novel thought. I never would have thought of it myself.

    Ah. So from now on we wait until we obtain French, German, Russian, and Chinese intel before we go to war?

    We have the finest intelligence capabilities in the world, flawed as they are. No thanks.

    Like all of the other arguments for letting inspections continue, it is pretty lame. It ignores the core of the problem: Saddam would still have been in power. Saddam's regime was the disease, the WMD were only a symptom.

    Would the inspections have found those BW production trailers? Maybe, maybe not. Would they have removed Saddam from power? No. Next idea...

    Since they would never have removed Saddam from power - at best, the only thing they were capable of doing was temporarily forcing him to curb his WMD programs, only to restart them once the inspectors left - they were a huge waste of time.

    The US was competent enough to take the steps necessary to end Saddam's regime and any threat it posed to anyone once and for all. The UN was competent enough to have meetings. And argue. And generally accomplish nothing. As it always does.

    The UN isn't into the intelligence business, and I don't mean that as a joke. They have no intelligence gathering function, or even any body designed to gather intel. They are literally not in the business.

    Only national governments maintain intelligence services.

    You have failed to make this case. Try again.
     
  5. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    They went to search for suspect material. That includes WMD.
     
  6. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    No, they did not. UNSCOM searched for banned materials, UNMOVIC's mission was to simply verify that Saddam had complied with UN resolutions. They were not designed as a search team, although they eventually had to evolve into one when it became clear that Saddam was not complying.

    But it was not supposed to be part of UNMOVIC's mission.
     
  7. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    exactly.
     
  8. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    Yes, exactly.
     
  9. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    That includes WMD.
     
  10. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    That included verifying that he was WMD free. It did not include intrusive inspections. UNMOVIC never had that capability.

    It was not part of their mission.
     
  11. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    How would you verify if Iraq is WMD free without searching for the weapons?
     
  12. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    Oh, they could poke around a little, but most of their work was just poring over documents, mainly Iraq's December declaration. But they were not allowed to kick down doors like UNSCOM did.

    They were not designed to be a search team, rezdawg. Stop trying to continually rewrite history and go look it up.
     
  13. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    I dont care if they were or werent designed to be a search team. Thats not important. The matter of the fact was that part of their job was to see to it whether or not Iraq had a WMD program. Its that simple.

    I never mentioned that they must "kick down doors" to search for WMD.
     
  14. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    It was important (you are correct - it has no relevance now ;)). A search team would have had people on it who were expert detectives, it would have had more funding, and more and better equipment. UNMOVIC had none of those things. In fact when 1441 was passed all it had was a small office in New York with a dozen-or-so strong staff...

    And because they were never designed to do that job, they could never hope to do aq good job of it.

    We have a 1300 or so person task force on the job, and look at the problems we're having. It is a huge country. UNMOVIC never had more than a hundred people actually looking for WMD.

    That is the only way to do it when the host isn't cooperating and is hiding things from you. That is what UNSCOM had to do.
     
  15. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    What point of mine are you arguing against?

    Are you just sticking up for johnheath or did i really say something that was so offline?


    My first line was..."they went to search for suspect material".



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2263680.stm

    What are the inspectors' new powers?

    The resolution gives the teams unrestricted inspection rights, including scrutiny of Saddam Hussein's palace compounds and other sites that have been exempt in the past.

    Weapons inspectors will, for the first time, be able to take witnesses and their families out of Iraq so that they can give evidence without fear of reprisals.

    Analysts say the resolution requires the Iraqis to "bend over backwards" to satisfy the inspectors.

    "This implies that they are going to have to fling open their doors, invite the inspectors to go anywhere and everywhere, reveal anything that they can think of about their capabilities," Rosemary Hollis of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London told the BBC.

    Previously, Iraqi officials often failed to co-operate with inspectors and thwarted efforts to carry out effective inspections.

    Failure to comply on Iraq's part could lead to military action.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I guess kicking down doors was part of the deal too.
     
  16. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    It doesn't say that at all.

    The Iraqi burden is to invite and bend over backwards to comply with a decade-old mandate. No "police" power of intrustion is stated or implied for the inspectors.

    Sounds like they greatest new power of the inspectors was to be able to liberate informants from the tyranny of Saddam.
     
  17. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    If Bush had used this as a pretext for war, I would have more respect for him. Instead, he harped and harped on the WMD, and now that none can be found, his credibility is in question.
     
  18. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,850
    Likes Received:
    12,923
    I always thought that the WMD was a non-starter anyway. I am surprised they've found nothing; but if we do find anything, remember, the serial numbers will be scratched off and the receipts will have gone missing. Remember, if Saddam acted with impunity, he knew at one time we would do nothing about it. A lot of stuff sold to him was marked MADE IN U.S.A.
     
  19. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    forget it
     
  20. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,607
    Likes Received:
    38,826
    Who cares, the deed is done...the Iraqi's and the world are better off....

    Time to move on......nothing to see here.

    DD
     

Share This Page