Vote on recent incident in killing of Tibetian pilgrams

other

they broke the law, but shooting was harsh

 

this will just lead to another debate, why not keep it in the one already being used?

 

Perhaps a nice Rodney King type beating would have been more warrented.

Rocket River

 

thats because since NewYorker cannot thru debate, he try to win thru a poll

add to that he really hates chinese posters here

 

I'm starting to not like them either...

;~)

It's not genocide. And it's not genocide which is the intention of the Chinese government in Tibet. It's cultural assimilation and it's wrong.

Cheers,
Brock

 

Well man, I don't know.

I would say, and I'm sure you would agree, that you are fairly inciteful in your remarks... as in inciting a riot.

It's like ying yang in the Chinese threads. The only beef I have is with some Chinese posters is their denial of their government's actions and apparent lack of a sense of humor. And, of course, the defense of "our government isn't as repressive and evil as yours!". Great defense. Alright, so your government is possibly less evil and repressive against others in the world. Which is more evil and repressive of its own citizens and what does one government's actions have to do with anothers?

You catch more flies with honey they say. They don't say exactly why you would want to catch flies...

I like you New Yorker... Just try not to screw up our international relations any more than they are already.

Cheers,
Brock

 

I guess it takes lots of courage to take on the evil Chinese bully on a message board. If I may guess again, that you don't have the guts to say similar racial or "political incorrect" things to any other ethnical group, like Jewish people or African Americans.

It's just hilarious how someone jumps up and down whining, complaining, and accusing many things about China and Chinese people, simply dismisses any input from any ethnical Chinese, to server your super ego. Not only that, "Chinese poster" becomes a new label to discredit anything about China, from the righteous New Yorker. Just Wow!

 

so much for international relations.

 

They need to build another great WWWWWWAAAAAALLLLLLL...

 

i'm not chinese.. and I'm not a liar like you.. and I wont mention my race to win an internet debate and hide it when I'm losing..

why do you hate chinese posters? why are you so insecure of them?

 

Private poll, booooooo. I wanted to see who voted for what.

 

Not really disagreeing, but I've read opinions that the forced cultural assimilation the British tried to impose upon the Irish over 4-5 centuries as cultural genocide. This is in light of the Brits destroying homes and literature, imposing "better customs", and colonizing the Irish's land.

 

What we are seeing is a classic example of American "debate." When you can't beat somebody with logic, try to insinuate them as brainwashed drones.

It's funny how you Americans always seem to be hurling accusations and allegations yet when the time arise to provide evidence to such, your records are... um, quite pitiful.

Want to prove that as a false statement? You can start by saying "China is committing genocide/cultural assimilation/whatever because..."

And let's not waste my time with your pathetic googled articles from AI and HRW, or better yet, Epoch Times or some pro-Tibetan independence group shall we?

 

Brockstapper:

It's not about comparing which government is more repressive, China's or USA's, it's about using the same criteria of judgement on China as well as the USA. It's about consistency, which apparently some American posters including you are reluctant to face. Applying your criteria of judgement on China's actions in the Tibetan province results in your sentence of cultural genocide, yet when you apply the same criteria of judgement on USA's actions in Iraq will yield the same sentence of cultural genocide, only at more severe degrees.

Can you acknowledge the importance of consistency in criteria or treat it with no regard?

 

sure, if you can acknowledge the topic is about Tibet and face the reality of the Chinese government's actions there. I have no problem talking about my government's actions. Start a thread and I'll participate. In the meantime keep dodging the reality by trying to sling mud. And I'm getting tired of Chinese posters misquoting me. I believe the term I used was cultural assimilation.

And no, it isn't the same in Iraq. We aren't trying to replace all the leaders in the mosques. We aren't trying to replace the culture in Iraq. We are trying to replace the government. That is where the parrellel ends in regards to Tibet.


Regards,
Brock

 

you are a brainwashed goon. How's that for classic American debate?