He asked his wife to take it down for a few days... so apparently, he knows it was wrong, and asked his wife to take it down "for a few days". She didn't, she is the boss apparently. Again, this is a sitting supreme court justice who knew flying an insurrection flag was wrong.
Ok so I guess we can’t have the city hall as a Supreme Court justice deciding whether the former president is immune from charges. Your desperate effort at defending the insurrection Justice is duly noted, but alito already acknowledged the flag was at best inappropriate and at worst a political statement in support of the insurrection.
Ok so I guess we can’t have the city hall as a Supreme Court justice deciding whether the former president is immune from charges. Your desperate effort at defending the insurrection Justice is duly noted, but alito already acknowledged the flag was at best inappropriate and at worst a political statement in support of the insurrection.
no, it was a sign of distress about her neighbors putting a F**K TRUMP sign in the neighborhood where children play, the neighbors calling Alito's wife a cunt, and the neighbors protesting outside her house with signs calling for Justice Alito's death
Another one of your maga lies already disproven.................why do you constantly post lies commie? I know its the maga way but come on man, your better than that. Never let the truth get in the way of your narrative
I assume the wives of Thomas and Alito have some great conversations about jewish space lasers, conspiracy theories and the Q happenings.........but no, their beliefs will not resonate with their spouse
Supreme Court sides with NRA in free speech ruling that curbs government pressure campaigns https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/30/politics/supreme-court-first-amendment/index.html excerpt: The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously backed the National Rifle Association in a First Amendment ruling that could make it harder for state regulators to pressure advocacy groups. The decision means the NRA may continue to pursue its lawsuit against a New York official who urged banks and insurance companies to cut ties with the gun rights group following the 2018 mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida, high school that left 17 people dead. “Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the most senior liberal, wrote for the court. “Ultimately, the critical takeaway is that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech,” Sotomayor added. The NRA claimed that Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, not only leaned on insurance companies to part ways with the gun lobby but threatened enforcement actions against those firms if they failed to comply. more at the link
I guess we should be getting ready for another specious editorial by one of the justices claiming how they are not political...
