1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

US Drug Czar says time to end drug war

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Hicklander, May 26, 2009.

  1. Hicklander

    Hicklander Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2003
    Messages:
    713
    Likes Received:
    17
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html

    WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting "a war on drugs," a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use.

    In his first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation's drug issues.

    "Regardless of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a product,' people see a war as a war on them," he said. "We're not at war with people in this country."

    View Full Image

    Brendan Smialowski for The Wall Street Journal
    Gil Kerlikowske, the new White House drug czar, signaled Wednesday his openness to rethinking the government's approach to fighting drug use.
    Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach.

    The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment's role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said.

    More

    Q&A: Transcript of the interview with Kerlikowske
    Already, the administration has called for an end to the disparity in how crimes involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine are dealt with. Critics of the law say it unfairly targeted African-American communities, where crack is more prevalent.

    The administration also said federal authorities would no longer raid medical-mar1juana dispensaries in the 13 states where voters have made medical mar1juana legal. Agents had previously done so under federal law, which doesn't provide for any exceptions to its mar1juana prohibition.

    Journal CommunityDISCUSS
    “ That the War on Drugs has been a complete failure is not even a question anymore. ”
    — David Dimston
    During the presidential campaign, President Barack Obama also talked about ending the federal ban on funding for needle-exchange programs, which are used to stem the spread of HIV among intravenous-drug users.

    The drug czar doesn't have the power to enforce any of these changes himself, but Mr. Kerlikowske plans to work with Congress and other agencies to alter current policies. He said he hasn't yet focused on U.S. policy toward fighting drug-related crime in other countries.

    Mr. Kerlikowske was most recently the police chief in Seattle, a city known for experimenting with drug programs. In 2003, voters there passed an initiative making the enforcement of simple mar1juana violations a low priority. The city has long had a needle-exchange program and hosts Hempfest, which draws tens of thousands of hemp and mar1juana advocates.

    Seattle currently is considering setting up a project that would divert drug defendants to treatment programs.

    Mr. Kerlikowske said he opposed the city's 2003 initiative on police priorities. His officers, however, say drug enforcement -- especially for pot crimes -- took a back seat, according to Sgt. Richard O'Neill, president of the Seattle Police Officers Guild. One result was an open-air drug market in the downtown business district, Mr. O'Neill said.

    "The average rank-and-file officer is saying, 'He can't control two blocks of Seattle, how is he going to control the nation?' " Mr. O'Neill said.

    Sen. Tom Coburn, the lone senator to vote against Mr. Kerlikowske, was concerned about the permissive attitude toward mar1juana enforcement, a spokesman for the conservative Oklahoma Republican said.


    Others said they are pleased by the way Seattle police balanced the available options. "I think he believes there is a place for using the criminal sanctions to address the drug-abuse problem, but he's more open to giving a hard look to solutions that look at the demand side of the equation," said Alison Holcomb, drug-policy director with the Washington state American Civil Liberties Union.

    Mr. Kerlikowske said the issue was one of limited police resources, adding that he doesn't support efforts to legalize drugs. He also said he supports needle-exchange programs, calling them "part of a complete public-health model for dealing with addiction."

    Mr. Kerlikowske's career began in St. Petersburg, Fla. He recalled one incident as a Florida undercover officer during the 1970s that spurred his thinking that arrests alone wouldn't fix matters.

    "While we were sitting there, the guy we're buying from is smoking pot and his toddler comes over and he blows smoke in the toddler's face," Mr. Kerlikowske said. "You go home at night, and you think of your own kids and your own family and you realize" the depth of the problem.

    Since then, he has run four police departments, as well as the Justice Department's Office of Community Policing during the Clinton administration.

    Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group that supports legalization of medical mar1juana, said he is "cautiously optimistic" about Mr. Kerlikowske. "The analogy we have is this is like turning around an ocean liner," he said. "What's important is the damn thing is beginning to turn."

    James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest law-enforcement labor organization, said that while he holds Mr. Kerlikowske in high regard, police officers are wary.

    "While I don't necessarily disagree with Gil's focus on treatment and demand reduction, I don't want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences."
     
  2. Lynus302

    Lynus302 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    199
    Don't have time to read this right now but the only thing I can say is this: good.
     
  3. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,255
    Likes Received:
    32,969
    Open a big can of QUIT with a side of GIVE UP

    Rocket River
    . . . a battle we cannot win . .. so give up the ghost
     
  4. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Thank goodness we appear to have someone with the ability to analyze facts leading our nations fight against drug abuse. I hope he focuses on drug ABUSE rather than drug use, two topics that are related, but very different.
     
  5. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    so, you think we should contine a failed policy so that we don't "quit"?
     
  6. BigBenito

    BigBenito Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    175
    I read his response as, "quit, because we can't win."
     
  7. Hicklander

    Hicklander Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2003
    Messages:
    713
    Likes Received:
    17
    First step is gonna be legalizing mar1juana and tax it like crazy
     
  8. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    When is Andymoon going to chip in? ;)

    Andy, I agree with your analysis, but why is it such a big issue with you. I have forgotten.
     
  9. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,980
    Likes Received:
    2,365
    How are they very different, andy?
     
  10. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Drug use is the same as alcohol use (exactly the same, alcohol is a drug). It is possible for people to responsibly use drugs of many different kinds.

    Drug abuse is using substances in irresponsible ways such that a person's life is negatively impacted.
     
  11. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,989
    Likes Received:
    19,932
    This question is insulting to your intelligence.
     
  12. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    I spent several years working in chemical dependency hospitals counseling adolescents who found themselves tangled up with drugs. I believe that we could do a much better job keeping drugs out of the hands of our kids if their manufacture and distribution were regulated.
     
  13. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,055
    Likes Received:
    3,755
    i'll be honest... i don't even know what 1/2 your posts mean, including this one.
     
  14. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    I agree was to mar1juana, but I have huge misgivings about extending this to cocaine, heroin, etc.

    mar1juana is not physically addictive. The more illicit drugs are.

    Even for those drugs that would remain illegal, I am against criminalizing addiction. There needs to be treatment. For those dealing the stuff, the slammer is appropriate.
     
  15. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,985
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    Statement presumes... even more than the Dude abides.
     
  16. BetterThanEver

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931
    Likes Received:
    189
    Legalizing it will bring the drug cartel out into the open. Then, they will have follow the law and stop murdering rival cartels.

    It worked for alcohol. Look at the Mafia and alcohol prohibition. Now, they are corporate entities. Anheuser-Busch doesn't go shooting up the cops and rival alcoholic beverage companies. They just spend all their money on lawyers and lobbyists, instead of hitmen.
     
  17. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    I always pinned Tony Montana as a rags to riches entrepreneur.

    A capitalist in the highest regard.
     
  18. Malcolm

    Malcolm Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,190
    Likes Received:
    34
    The sad thing is people failed to realize that the United States is a country that was build on drug use
     
  19. DrewP

    DrewP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    26
    this is such an ambiguous statement it must be right!
     
  20. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    18,195
    Likes Received:
    8,596
    and advertisement, like the tobacco industry.

    Its a bit of a stretch to compare 10 years of prohibition to a century ban on drug use.
     

Share This Page