President Bush, Our Leader . . . This was the same man who came within a hair's breadth of losing an election in November, who withstood the political chicanery of the Florida Democratic machine to fix the vote count. This was the same man who admitted to having a drinking problem in younger years, and whose happy-go-lucky lifestyle led him to mediocre grades in college and an ill-fated oil venture. This was the same man who mangled syntax even more than his father, and whose speaking missteps became known as "Bushisms." And on Friday, this was the man who bore the weight of the world and the responsibilities of a generation with dignity, class, confidence, appropriate solemnity, and even much-needed wit. One thing struck me during the campaign, that difficult, roller-coaster campaign that now seems years ago. It was that George W. Bush never seemed to get ruffled. Whether the theft of a campaign debate video or the sudden (some would say, vicious) release of a DUI arrest two decades ago at a key moment, "W" did not lose his cool. At times, his staff seemed overconfident, as did many of us. A 350-electoral-vote win, they quietly implied . . . and we optimistically believed. Then they counted the votes, miscounted others, and re-counted still others. At the end, he was still there. Whereas Al Gore almost frantically huffed and puffed, trying to gin up something out of nothing, Bush quietly but confidently waited at his ranch. He didn't do anything: that is the mistake people have constantly made with this man, confusing lack of bluster for absence of action. No, his team of attorneys and the iron-willed James Baker were carrying out his orders, but "W" stayed in the background, confident and faithful. You see, it is this faith business that confounded everyone. We have had such actors and liars in public office that we have looked skeptically whenever anyone used the term faith. But this was the same man who was the first politician ever in recent memory to name Jesus Christ as the lord of his life on public TV. Not an oblique reference to being "born-again" or having a "life change." He said the un-PC-like phrase, "Jesus Christ," to which his handlers and advisors, no doubt, off stage, were also saying, "Jesus Christ" in a much different tone. God has a way of honoring those who honor Him. David learned that while he was on the run from Saul's armies. Job learned that after his time of horrible tribulation. The Messiah said so Himself, many times. So this was the man who actually put faith into practice. He actually loves those who hate him. It is a staggering concept, so foreign in daily occurrence that few thought it anything but grandstanding. Even one of "W"'s biggest supporters chided the President for adhering to his "new tone." Yet there he was, again and again, thanking the Democrats. Appointing his enemies to high places in his government. Inviting his former foes and their wives to private movie screenings, and (I know, this is hard to stomach) even treating them with dignity. See, this was the man who learned early on how faith worked: by praying for his enemies, you "heap burning coals upon their heads." This was the man who named the absolute top people in national security and defense, then caught barbs from the politically righteous that this one didn't have the right views on abortion or that one didn't have the right position on guns. And on September 11, at mid-morning, this was the man thrust into a position only known by Roosevelt, Churchill, Lincoln, and Washington. The weight of the world was on his shoulders, and the responsibility of a generation was on his soul. So this same man---the one that the media repeatedly attempted to tarnish with charges of "illegitimacy," and the one whose political opponents desperately sought to stonewall until mid-term elections---walked to his seat at the front of the National Cathedral just three days after the two most impressive symbols of American capitalism and prosperity virtually evaporated, along with, perhaps, thousands of Americans. As he sat down next to his wife, immediately I knew that even if his faith ever faltered, hers didn't. I have never seen a more peaceful face than Laura Bush, whose eyes seemed as though they were already gazing at the final outcome . .. not just of this conflict, but of her reward in Heaven itself. In this marriage, you indeed got two for the price of one. Then came the defining moment of our generation. Some people fondly recall their Woodstock days. Others mark with grim sadness November 22, 1963, as the day America lost her innocence. But I firmly believe when the history of this time is written, it will be acknowledged by friend and foe alike that President George W. Bush came of age in that cathedral and lifted a nation off its knees. It wasn't so much his words, though read a decade later, they will indeed be as stirring as any. This conflict would end, he noted, ". . . at a time of our choosing." It certainly wasn't his emotion. What had to have been one of the most stunning exhibitions of self-control in presidential history, "W" was able to deliver his remarks without losing either his resolve or his focus, or, more important, his confidence. It was as if God's hand, which had guided him through that sliver-thin election, now rested fully on him. His quiet confidence let our enemies know . . . and believe me, they know . . .that they made a grave miscalculation. Now, this same man who practiced his faith through a tough election, who steeled his convictions even more in a drawn-out Florida battle, and who never once gave in to the temptation to get in the gutter with his foes (well, ok, maybe the "Clymer" comment is an exception), this same man now lifted the weight of the world and the responsibility of a generation and put it on his modest shoulders as though it were another unpleasant duty. As he walked back to his seat, the camera angle was appropriate. He was virtually alone in the scene, alone in that massive place of God, just him and the Lord. But that's the way it's always been in his life recently. In that brief time it took him to return to his seat, I believe he heard words to the effect of, "You can do this, George. I am with you always. And you can do this well, because I am going before you. And don't worry about the weight. I've got it." And I saw in his eyes a quiet acknowledgment. "I know. Thank you, Lord." Back at his seat, when "W" sat down, George H. W. Bush reached over and took his son's hand. The elder Bush always struck me as a religious man, but not someone who shared his life on a daily basis with the Lord. George H. W. treats the Father like a respected uncle, visiting Him on appropriate holidays and knowing the relationship is real, but not constant. Anyway, I believe that in that fatherly squeeze George H. W. said, "I wish I could do this for you, son, but I can't. You have to do this on your own." "W" squeezed back and gave him that look of peace that Laura had kept throughout. It said, "I don't have to do it alone, dad. I've got help." What a blessing to have a professing Christian as President - one who is not ashamed to admit it! Please take a moment after you read this to pray for him - he truly does have the weight of the world on his shoulders. Pray that God will sustain him and give him wisdom and discernment in his decisions. Make no mistake about it - the decisions he makes in the coming days, weeks and months will literally define the future of our country and the free world. Pray for his protection and that of his family. After you have prayed, send this to everyone on your e-mail list. Our President needs Christians around the world to be praying for him. As this makes the e-mail rounds, eventually there could literally be people praying for him 24/7!! He needs it. God bless us all! -- Author Unknown
Spare me... God bless this, God bless that, God and God and God God God. GW has been doing a fine job since 9-11 but I'd just assume he and everyone else leave God out of this.
Rich -- thanks for posting this....i've been reading through psalms pretty heavy since 9/11...recently i've been thinking about how much more that book must mean to G.W.B. since the passing of those events. I couldn't agree more with your post....and i really appreciate you taking the time to post it. God bless you! for those who don't agree...you're certainly free to post whatever you like...but to some of this, the post carries with it a great deal of spiritual significance...so maybe this is a "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all" kind of moment, brought to you by the manners taught you by your mother. it seems pretty clear that rich's post is heart-felt and comes from a love for his Creator....certainly something good can be taken from that, even if you're not a believer.
Max, I get the impression that Rich is passing this on, not writing it himself...am I wrong, Rich? Not that that matters, just trying to help In regards to the content, it is too much idealizing the man and the situation. Indeed, it seems at times to be too heavy with christomimesis. I also think it is a little silly to claim that he is in the grounds only known by "Roosevelt, Churchill, Lincoln, and Washington" as their situations were all much different. Further, I would counter that it was not so un-pc to mention Jesus Christ. If you look to the primaries, when candidates were asked about their favorite political philosopher. In this situation, Bush was close to the end, all those before him listed well known thinkers, scholars, etc...Bush says Jesus. Everyone after him, then, included Jesus and those who had earlier mentioned others used the beginning of their very next answer period to meantion how they, too, found Jesus to be great. When you further compound this with the fact that the United States is the most religious industrialized nation in the world, this theory deteriorates even more. The levels of Christian fervor in this country are oly parallelled in some underdeveloped countires. How would that make the US a hostile environment to the mentioning of Jesus Christ. JFK - a liberal - ran into much greater problems because he was a Catholic. He basically had to assure the country that his non-protestant views would not be a problem and that the pope would not run the country. I, again, propose that any president would have done about the same thing. There are formulas to be followed. This is responsive, they will usually be the same. The main difference with a president and FP will usually come out of created, enacted policy...not responsive. This is not to belittle Bush, just to say that any president would be capable and would be advised for every move. Along with the blatant christomimesis, I find the eschatalogical conclusions of the text to be rather dramatic and uneccessary.
rimbaud: No I didn't write it. I noted "Author Unknown." I got it as an email to be circulated. Max thanked me twice for "posting" it but I didn't take that for mistaking authorship. He did thank me quite profusely; I think he just liked it! rimbaud: "Along with the blatant christomimesis, I find the eschatalogical conclusions of the text to be rather dramatic and uneccessary." Fair to say you are not a believer?
Rich, I guess I interpreted Max thanking you for "taking the time" as if it took you a while to write it...it takes nothing to cut and paste. Also he said the post "comes from your heart" which would suggest they are your words. I could be wrong though...in any case, it doesn't matter. Fair to say you are not a believer? Yes, I do not believe that Bush is the second coming of Christ and that his crusade here will not signify the end of the world.
I just want to say ..GOD bless everyone here, whether they believe or not....because I believe in peace and love...and uh, peace and love is good, and to me GOD = Love...and GOD bless you no matter what you say.....
rimbaud: you have no idea how many times that thing had been forwarded. It took me 20 minutes to erase the >s and re-format the darn thing. I will graciously accept Max's thanks; I get little of that here. rimbaud: "Yes, I do not believe that Bush is the second coming of Christ and that his crusade here will not signify the end of the world." Well, that's not what I meant (you know that); if you'd like to try again, I'll check back later.
This reads like one of those flyers that would get handed out on the Drag back when I lived in Austin.
Well the Whole Damn country is Saying God Bless America So maybe you guys need to get the Flag out . SUCKER!!!
Actually, your opinion is so very un-American moe that maybe you should be the one to get the **** (*s added by me) out.
Well, I think it's perfectly understandable to be saying such a thing at a time like this, and this is exactly the sort of moment where you should turn to your religion for guidance. I'm talking about the heavy-handed nature of this 'article'. It's like it should be titled 'President Bush, Our Saint'. Let's give him his due for the good job he (AND his advisors/staff) have done and quit trying to idolize the man for being thrust into a horrendous situation.
RM95: "I stop reading this idiot's work after this sentence." What a wonderful example of liberal open-mindedness!!!!