1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Trade idea (not even a rumor) with NY revisited - Moochie/Griffin for Ward

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by AroundTheWorld, Nov 16, 2003.

  1. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    (from ESPN Fantasy Basketball player info page)

    Nov 15, 2003 News Ward was replaced in starting lineup Friday night by Howard Eisley, the New York Daily News reports. Ward played just 17 minutes while Eisley scored nine points with six assists in 29 minutes.

    SPIN: N.Y. coach Don Chaney says he replaced Ward mostly because Eisley has struggled as a backup. The article also speculates that the team could release Ward before his contract becomes guaranteed on Jan. 10 if they acquire another point guard. The Knicks are interested first in Chicago's Jamal Crawford. If they can't get a deal done with the Bulls, they'll look at Nick Van Exel and Jamaal Tinsley.


    How about either Moochie, Griffin, Amaechi for Ward/Harrington (after Dec. 1) or Moochie/Griffin for Ward now. With either deal, we might have to throw in cash, because we would get Ward's expiring contract.

    Why we would do it:

    Ward is a pass-first point guard, and a very good three-point shooter who gets a lot of steals. I think he could be the perfect backup to Steve Francis. Plus, the obvious riddance of Moochie and Griffin.

    Why they might do it:

    They want to get rid of Ward, it seems. Apparently, they also want to get rid of Harrington. Perhaps they would be willing to take the gamble on Griffin's potential - perhaps they would think that once there is a change of scenery for Griffin, he could put his head on straight again and his unquestioned potential might still lead to him being a very good player.

    What do you think?

    Thanks.
     
  2. yipengzhao

    yipengzhao Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Messages:
    3,615
    Likes Received:
    6
    I think I'd do it, this is one of the few good trade proposals I've seen. Moochie and Griffin have little value for the Rockets, meanwhile in the east they might be something for a team that really sucks and has no talent. Meanwhile Ward would be a pretty good backup. You could go with a three guard rotation then.
     
  3. LeGrouper

    LeGrouper Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,423
    Likes Received:
    5
    If they would, I would.

    In other words.... I would.

    Especially if we could get a second rounder or something too.
     
  4. tzhang

    tzhang Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    EG + NY Media = scary
     
  5. The Real Shady

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2000
    Messages:
    17,173
    Likes Received:
    3,972
    I would in a heart beat. I think that Griffin would have to show some signs that he is going to try and come back this year for NY to pull the triger on a deal like that. Otherwise they would be trading Ward for Moochie.
     
  6. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,741
    Likes Received:
    15,041
    dang we go from getting rashard to charlie ward for eddie griffin

    :(
     
  7. pasox2

    pasox2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2001
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    47
    I had a good post reply, and lost it with a bad keystroke and that damn autoscroll problem.:mad:

    NY needs to move Ward before or at the deadline for talent.

    Rockets need to move EG at deadline too.

    Is getting rid of Moochie the best that we can do in trade? If Ward can play it's just a bonus.

    We also have the trade exception. We also have Cat as expendable, with Jackson, Francis, AG, and Pike under contract and able to play effectively.

    I think we're going to be able to do a bit more than just exit Moochie with our trade chips. There are other good players available now; there will be developments as the deadline approaches. Prepare the deal in January, barring injuries. Show the bait in early Feb., then deal.

    I'd like a NY deal a lot better if Kurt Thomas were involved.
     
  8. TechieOne

    TechieOne Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    242
    Good Idea for the Rockets but I don't see why the Knicks would want to do it. They're already overloaded with forwards and aging point guards.
     
  9. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,741
    Likes Received:
    15,041
    how many years after this one is moochie under contract??
     
  10. RocketFan007

    RocketFan007 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2001
    Messages:
    5,172
    Likes Received:
    267
    New York is also looking to get rid of Othella, maybe a Mooch/Griffin/ManBoobs for Ward/Harrington?
     
  11. MManal

    MManal Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2000
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1
    Interesting idea.... I have wanted the Rockets to acquire a guard in the mold of Charlie Ward for a while now. A steady PG that can hit from the outside, play solid defense and not turn it over a lot. In addition, Othella Harrington would thrive under JVG imo. I dont see any reason why he couldnt be a solid 10-8 type of player with 25 MPG or so. The Rockets do need a steady guard in the backcourt and some help in the frontcourt.

    I would rather make this type of deal than something massive that will break up the core of this team. This team has a few minor holes that it needs to fill but trading any of the key components (including Mobley would be a step back imo). I have been very critical of Cuttino in the past, but thus far I have felt he is responding very well to JVG and is becoming a key contributor to this ballclub. Van Gundy is helping Mobley develop into more than just a scorer and become more of a two way threat for the Rockets. Mobley is doing a better job picking his spots, making less errors and playing excellent defense.

    Despite the disastrous performance against Toronto, I still think the Rockets are going to be a major player in the West this season. The offense has become ragged very quickly, but this group of players still plays extremely hard and plays tough defense.
     
  12. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,833
    Likes Received:
    3,180
    Thje only upside of this deal is bidding adieu to lovable, but can't play, Mooch. Ward is better, but certainly not either wonderful or much of an answer.

    If O came here and got 25 MPG this team would be in a world of hurt, IMHO.
     
  13. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,887
    Likes Received:
    12,980
    I like this trade idea. It has definite possibilities. I might be one of the few who believe that some of our pieces will be moved soon, once players return from injury/gobbling anti-inflammatories.

    But you know what I would do? (Not sure that the other teams would.) Make that Mooch/EG trade for Charlie Ward and then send his expiring contract with Man-Boobs (whose contract expires in a year) to Golden State for Nick Van Exel.

    Golden State wants the cap-space (although, to be sure, they might have delusions of grabbing Yao-za: fat chance).

    Bring NVE home. Then make whatever alternate moves are necessary. We have a decent team, but we're not quite there yet, are we?

    Apologies that I mention "trade this guy, trade that guy," but Moochie just....doesn't seem to have "it." That's being nice. He can be OK, and he's trying. Maybe throwing EG in would make the Knicks bite.
     
  14. SmeggySmeg

    SmeggySmeg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    14,887
    Likes Received:
    123
    so NY wants to upgrade the Point guard spot, and they have Crawford and NVE in mind....


    WHY ON EARTH WOULD THEY THEN BE INTERESTED IN MOOCHIE!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  15. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    You forgot we are throwing EG in. Don't you know that he is a hot commodity???
     
  16. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    You misunderstand. Everyone (probably except the Nets right now) always wants to upgrade their point guard spot. So, if they can get Crawford or even Tinsley and feel that this will be the best thing to do for them, this trade here would not be possible. But who says they will actually be able to get Crawford or Tinsley? Tinsley maybe, but is he really that good?

    Also, they do not only want to upgrade their point guard spot, they also want to get out of having to pay Ward another year of his pretty expensive contract. For that same money, and if they possibly get some additional considerations, they might be inclined to "swallow" Moochie's contract (and hope that he could possibly be a solid backup point guard for them, but this is not their main interest) - PLUS, they could pick up a young player with (still) lots of potential. There would be risk involved, but they would essentially get rid of a very expensive contract and a player they do not see in their future for a young big mean with great shot-blocking ability and still untapped potential (at least one could argue that this is the case).

    If we threw in some cash considerations, this deal might not be so bad for them, because in the short term, they would only give up a player they don't care about, and they would get a player they can test for almost a full season - if they like him, they can give him a contract, if they don't, not too much is lost.

    As I said, it is only an idea, but I don't think it is as outlandish as you seem to imply.
     
  17. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    To state it in a hopefully more understandable way from the point of view of NY:

    Downside:
    - Short-term, they will have a worse backup PG - Moochie is worse than Ward, no doubt about it.
    - Moochie's contract is longer than Ward's would be.
    - If EG continues to have mental problems, it might become a distraction to their team.

    Upside:
    - EG develops into a good player who will not cause trouble. Remember, this guy DOES have raw talent and he is still young. Besides, other than Thomas, they really don't have anyone in the front court, and Thomas might become a great tutor for Eddie, they might even play 4 and 5.
    - If EG does not break out in a positive way, they don't give him an extension and he comes off the cap after this season.
    - If they keep Ward, he will cost twice as much next season as Moochie will, so if they decide not to keep Eddie, they do save money next year that they would have had to pay to Ward.
    - We could sweeten it, as I said, by additional cash considerations. Moochie's contract runs longer than Ward's would. So we could throw in, let's say, $ 3 mio. in cash (if permissible) and thereby almost pay Moochie's salary for another year.
    - Maybe we could also throw in some future 2nd round draft pick or so.

    So the only real downside is having a worse backup point guard, whereas the upside is mainly a lesser financial burden, plus, they have at least an outside chance at improving their front court considerably.

    Remember, they did take on Sprewell (I know, much better and more proven player than Eddie), who also had a lot of issues, and it kind of worked out for them.
     
  18. TechieOne

    TechieOne Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    242
    I think they have a 2 million buyout option of Ward's contract this year.
     
  19. Sherlock

    Sherlock Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Now why would we trade EG when is trade value is at an absolutely horrendous LOW? Bad business, and bad for our future. Yes, I think he needs to be encapsulated, so he doesn't pull down the team, and probably won't start for the rest of the year. But, if he get's his act together, and doesn't start, we'll be able to sign him to a cheap contract, with nothing but upside. Let him get his head on straight. Bring in John Lucas. He turned it around, so can Eddie. Then, if we want to trade him, fine.

    Steve wouldn't be too happy if we traded Moochie. That's why Moochie got his fat contract in the first place. I believe JVG will turn Moochie around too, and even he will have value, just like Cato has done. I do like Ward, but I don't think he's that much better than Moochie.

    So, I think this is a bad trade for us.

    <b>Hang on to our trading chits, guys, and wait for just the right moment.</b> Bad time to panic sell. In another year or two, Eddie, Moochie, Mo, and Cato will all be more valuable, and we can get something better in trade. In the meantime, let's let JVG train our main guys, and teach them how to win, and play smart. As much as I loved Rudy, he was a cheerleader, not a teacher, and these guys just don't have the basketball smarts, as a result. But a couple years under JVG, and they'll all play better ball.

    Look at Cato. If we'd have tried to get rid of him 2 years ago, we'd have had to pay someone to take him. Now, he's very tradeable, but as a result, we don't want to.
     
  20. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,264
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Nobody in their right mind would want either EG or Moochie. The Knicks want to upgrade the PG spot. I think if they can't get Crawford,Van Exel,or Tinsley all thes guys are better prospects than Moochie. They will probably retain Ward even if he has to come off the bench.
     

Share This Page