I guess there can be a debate on whether Public broadcasting should go the way of the dodo, or whether increased corporate targeting will influence the integrity and standards of these programs. News Hour is one of the best sources of TV news around. It attempts to strike discussion that used to make the evening news an important part of American life. I don't want to see it go commercial. Lehrer Says ‘News Hour’ Money Woes Are Worst Ever By ELIZABETH JENSEN It has been a rough few weeks for “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” on PBS. In late April, Mr. Lehrer, who turns 74 on Monday, had aortic valve replacement surgery. He said he was recovering nicely and expects to be back on the air toward the end of June. But the nightly newscast’s funding situation could take longer to heal. In its 25 years on the air, “NewsHour” has had fallow budget periods, but none that equal the current one, Mr. Lehrer acknowledged. The financial squeeze was precipitated last summer when Archer Daniels Midland ended its 14-year sponsorship of the program. That sponsorship provided nearly $4 million (and some years as much as $7 million) of the program’s yearly budget, which varies from $26 million to $28 million. On May 1, salaries were frozen at the newscast, and company contributions to 401(k) retirement funds were suspended, cutbacks suggested by the staff. “NewsHour” still has two corporate sponsors — Chevron and the Pacific Life Insurance Company — and it receives support from PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. But only part of the Archer money has been replaced, leaving the budget several million dollars short. “NewsHour,” along with other PBS mainstays, may have a longer-term problem. Not only are corporations cutting back on all forms of advertising during the current economic slowdown, but public television’s model — soliciting long-term commitments — is also increasingly out of step with the changing needs of corporations, which no longer sponsor public television programs for purely philanthropic reasons. “Now, it’s more a marketing-driven conversation, about audiences, and delivery and engagement,” said Rob Flynn, vice president of communications and marketing for “NewsHour.” In the last five years, corporate underwriting on PBS has varied; in 2007, it totaled $91 million, or just under 23 percent of all program financing, PBS said. But the core series of the PBS schedule, like “NewsHour,” “Nova” and “Masterpiece Theater,” known internally as the icon series, have had corporate underwriting drop 40 percent. As a result, although viewers will not have noticed any difference except in the end credits, PBS is permitting programs to experiment, which has produced short-term sponsorships for “Nova” and “Antiques Roadshow,” and even a two-week Sony Classics sponsorship of “Masterpiece Theater.” The experiments could become permanent, as PBS is studying changing its policies about sponsorship. Last fall, a study from the research firm McKinsey found that corporations would be more receptive if PBS permitted shorter deals, broadcast corporate messages more quickly and provided more audience data, “so they could have a good sense of who they were reaching with their messages,” said Andrew Russell, senior vice president of PBS Ventures. Mr. Flynn argues that “NewsHour” has a strong story to tell; it reaches 1.2 million adults a night and its audience includes a high proportion of what he calls “opinion leaders.” Last week, Mr. Flynn said, “NewsHour” completed a 13-week sponsorship commitment from the Danish company Vestas Wind Systems, a maker of wind turbines, which will begin in mid-August. “NewsHour” also increased its solicitations for foundation donations in recent years. Including a new Starr Foundation grant for $1.5 million, foundation support of “NewsHour” is up to $7 million from $2 million five years ago. The money comes from 16 foundations, some of which designate their donations for the coverage of specific topics. In an odd twist, that has allowed “NewsHour” to bolster its foreign reporting even as it struggles with the overall budget. Four international reporting grants — from the Gruber Family Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund — were recently tapped to permit Margaret Warner, a correspondent, to leave earlier than planned for China so she could report on the earthquake there. These kinds of restricted grants are criticized by some media watchdogs, who worry that they let foundations dictate coverage. But so far “NewsHour” grants have been “a great success story,” said Linda Winslow, the program’s executive producer, although she added, “I would not pooh-pooh the fear that it becomes something that steers you to something you wouldn’t already do.” She noted that “NewsHour” had also rejected some grants for being too narrow. Ms. Winslow is figuring out new ways to operate under a budget squeeze. Open jobs, including a correspondent and a senior producer, are not being filled for now. Longer term, she is investigating partnerships, but covering the news remains her top priority, a sentiment echoed by Mr. Lehrer. “We’ve always played it close to the chest financially,” he said. “That’s part of who we are, part of being in public broadcasting.” The other issue facing the program is succession. Mr. Lehrer has been on “NewsHour” and its predecessor, “The MacNeil/Lehrer Report,” since 1975 — a stretch as anchor that is 14 years longer than Walter Cronkite’s at CBS — and it is almost impossible to think of the show without him. He said he had thought about a succession plan, however, and Ms. Winslow acknowledged that it had been discussed. But she would not discuss details. Neither would Mr. Lehrer, except to say that despite the recent health scare, he has no plans to step down anytime soon. The valve problem, he noted, had been with him since birth, and was just now caught. “I’ve always said, ‘I’ll do this until one of two things happens: it’s not fun any more or I start drooling on the air,’ ” he said. “As we speak, neither is happening.”
PBS, like NBC and MSNBC, has fallen on hard times because they veered so far to the left that the great swath of Middle America could no longer stomach the bias. It's too bad. I loved some of their programming but I, for one, no longer contribute to them. There are too many more worthy causes that need contributions.
Not even close to being the truth. I love these moral tales of righteous infliction of retribution for veering away from Joe Sixpack, the loyal PBS viewer (who probably didn't exist in the first place). Completely fabricated and not backed by any evidence, but lovable in their simpleton-hood. Back in the reality-based community, they couldn't be further from the truth. Rather than "veer to the left", It has either remained the same or gone in the opposite direction. You really think Ken Burns documentaries on Baseball are communistic plots by godless troskyites? The McLaughlin Group is sending out coded messages on collective farming? The real answer is more simple and less exciting, and not some hackneyed morality play; the fragmentation of the TV viewing audience in general and the plethora of alternative means of entertainment has - unsurprisingly, affected public television as well as private television. End.
its amazing that he tried to turn this into a left/right issue. even more amazing, poor economies affect giving edit: the only network I personally have seen William Buckley appear on is PBS
I gave myself the day off. My potassium level went to 6.7 so my nephrologist advised me to do something to reduce my stress level while taking some really awful stuff to purge my system. Purging angst here helps a lot!
You are so full of ***** I can smell it through my monitor. NewsHour (unlike MSNBC) always shows both sides of controversial issues, and always has guests representing polar opposite viewpoints. You obviously can't break away from Fox "News" long enough to realize this.
Of course and that's only the tip of the ice berg. Austin City Limits a show celebrating that hotbed of liberalism known as Austin clearly has a political message cleverly hidden by first rate musical acts. Nova promotes godlessness by doing shows about how dinosaurs might've evolved into modern birds instead of the truth that dinosaurs drowned in the great flood due to their sinfulness. Plus it was no accident that Mr. Rogers wore a RED vest. Clearly he is a Manchurian candidate out to brainwash our children into accepting Communism. Don't get me started about Sesame Street anyone who can't see the socialist propaganda there is either ignorant or a fellow traveller.
Not anymore I'm not, I gar-on-tee. I should keep up a running battle, but I will confess that I haven't watched PBS in some years now. Bill Moyers outraged me one time too many. Is he still around?
Frontline does tke some pretty biased positions sometimes. It is a great show but it does kinda reek sometimes.
Funny thing is that I have been recently thinking about watching more PBS news. I have gotten out of the habit due to having cable/satellite. I also gradually stopped watching the PBS News Hour because they were becoming too pro-war and conservative for my taste. Recently I have gotten a bit tired of the tone of such shows as Keith Obermann, though I generally like his political views. I am now definitely going to TIVO the show.
It is easy to become LEFT . . . when the Right keeps moving more Right what was Centrist 15 yrs ago . . . . is almost extreme left now and it is still basically the same thing . . . Rocket River
The pink teletubby doesn't have anything on Bert and Ernie. And the Cookie Monster is an allegory to the failed War on Drugs.
Only pretty much every social commentator from either side of the political spectrum in the last 20 years has agreed with this. Why do you think we still actively debate creationism in schools? In the year 2008?
PBS has some incredible programing -- I hope they can find some sort of balance before turning to heavy advertising. They need to use Clutchfans as a model.
well has the position on creationism in schools changed in the last 15 years? I think it has and I think the "Centrist" view is NOT the Left view of today.
Can they have a Tom Silva vs Tavis Smiley challenge where the loser has to do commercial TV for a 100 days?
The fact that you actually believe there's a centrist view of this issue illustrates my point completely - junk science and fabulism have no place in science class. That's not a political view but a logical one. This is not a matter on which a left/right view point should even be permitted.