1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

This generation's Roe v. Wade, Brown vs. Board---Supreme Court moves on Obamacare.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Northside Storm, Mar 27, 2012.

  1. Northside Storm

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,262
    Likes Received:
    450
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/us/health-law-hearings-open-in-supreme-court.html

    http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABRE82L1CJ20120327

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/26/supreme-court-justices-healthcare-reform-showdown

    Arguably the most important case the Supreme Court will decide in this generation. As some will frame it, liberty vs effective government. Federal power is fundamentally being contested, on a level that we have not seen, in terms of the implications, for quite some while.
     
  2. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    I agree this is likely going to be a landmark case.
     
  3. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    I am going to predict that the Supreme Court will uphold the government's constitutionally given power to levy taxes. Nothing landmark here.
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Except yesterday's arguments determined that this isn't a tax.
     
  5. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    You mean they ruled it wasn't a tax? Or didn't rule it as a tax?
     
  6. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,208
    This isn't quite right. Yesterday's oral arguments were focused on a different law - one that basically requires something to be called a tax for it to be relevant to that law. The government's larger authority to tax does not necessarily require something to be called a tax - just to function as a tax.
     
  7. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,789
    Likes Received:
    3,708
    i think technically they can't argue its a tax till someone has paid the penalty
     
  8. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,391
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    who would frame it that way? they're the same argument. the more accurate "framing" would be individual liberty vs. an unrestrained federal government.

    that's the fundamental question.
     
  9. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,122
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    If the opinion is "limited to the present circumstances," there will be no need to read the rest of it.
     
  10. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,122
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    Interesting. In all my History, PoliSci, and Philosophy classes, I never came across anyone who defined individual liberty as the freedom to die in a cheap apartment because you couldn't get health insurance from profit-driven companies and so had to sell everything to pay for the little health care you could.

    Of course, back then, Rand was considered a bad fiction writer.
     
  11. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    B*ll*****.

    The fundimental question is whether health care is a right everyone is entitled to, or a privilege that only those who can afford it are entitled to.
     
  12. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,391
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    is health insurance the same thing as health care?
     
  13. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,105
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    When the 10 O'Clock news has someone being thrown out of their house and complaining about the health care penalty this is gonna reverse field.
     
  14. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    Yes in part. It certainly is when people have an ongoing chronic illness like diabetes that requires constant upkeep, monitoring and input by medical doctors.

    Without insurance it isn't possible to get the same level of care.
     
  15. gwayneco

    gwayneco Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2000
    Messages:
    3,459
    Likes Received:
    36
    Guess you had a bunch of Marxist profs.
     
  16. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,980
    Likes Received:
    2,365
    I'm hearing that Kennedy is breaking right
     
  17. QdoubleA

    QdoubleA Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    256
    And socialists, don't forget socialists!
     
  18. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    I'm hearing he's breaking, right?

    He's poppin' and lockin' as well as doing the centipede and spinning on his head. He's amazing.
     
  19. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,391
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    i dress left.
     
  20. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Yesterday's oral arguments were about whether a suit could be brought for a tax that hasn't been collected. The government nor the opponents are arguing that this is a tax and the Court appointed a counsel to make that position to show whether the court could hear the case. For the purposes of this case the court ruled that this wasn't a tax. True that is a limited argument pertaining just to the case and not a larger question. So I should've been more specific.
     

Share This Page