1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The sixth big extinction in Earth's history is under way?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by BobFinn*, Mar 18, 2004.

  1. BobFinn*

    BobFinn* Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2000
    Messages:
    11,438
    Likes Received:
    6
    Posted 3/18/2004 2:00 PM
    Butterfly, bird loss could be harbinger of major extinction


    WASHINGTON (AP) — A detailed survey of birds and butterflies in Britain shows a population decline of 54% to 71%, a finding that suggests the world may be undergoing another major extinction.
    Researchers said the study helps support the theory that the sixth big extinction in Earth's history is under way, and this one is caused by humans.

    In a series of population surveys that combed virtually every square yard of England, Scotland and Wales over 40 years, more than 20,000 volunteers counted each bird, butterfly and native plant they could find. An analysis of the findings appears this week in the journal Science.

    The results showed that populations of the surveyed species are in sharp decline throughout England, Wales and Scotland, with some species gone altogether.

    A survey of 58 butterfly species found that some species had experienced a 71% population swoon since similar surveys were taken in 1970 through 1982. Some 201 bird species were tracked between 1968 and 1971, and then again from 1988 to 1991. An analysis showed that that avian population had declined by about 54%.

    Two surveys of 1,254 native plant species showed a decrease of about 28% over the past 40 years.

    "Population extinctions were recorded in all the main ecosystems of Britain," the authors report in Science. They suggested that the finding strengthens the hypothesis shared by many scientists that "the biological world is approaching the sixth major extinction event in its history."

    Scott Miller, a biologist with the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, said the British study was impressive and powerful because it was so thorough.

    "The United Kingdom has a monitoring system (for birds, plants and wildlife) that is unmatched," Miller said. "They may not be representative of the world as a whole, but they have the best data."

    He said the data supports the idea that the rise of humans over the tens of thousands of years along with climate changes are bringing on an extinction of many species and reshaping the natural world in ways that aren't thoroughly understood.

    Scientists have identified five extinction events in Earth's history, with some so severe that more than 90% of all life forms were killed off. The last and most famous extinction was the Cretaceous-Tertiary event some 63 million years ago that killed off the dinosaurs and allowed the rise of mammals. It is thought to have been caused by an asteroid hitting Earth.

    The causes of the other extinctions are not well understood. The largest ended the Permian Period some 250 million years ago. All but about 4% of all species disappeared then. There were three other lesser-known events in the Ordovician (435 million years ago), the Devonian (357 million years ago) and the Triassic (198 million years ago) periods.

    "We are in the middle of a sixth extinction event that began about 50,000 years ago" with the expanding role in the world of human beings, said Paul S. Martin, a zoologist and geochemist at the University of Arizona in Tucson. "It's happening, but it's slower and it is not clear it will be as severe as some of the others."

    Stuart Pimm, an ecologist at Duke University, said in Science that the British study results "show that we have likely underestimated the magnitude of the pending extinctions."

    Miller and Martin both point to the hundreds of species, mostly large animals and birds, that already are gone, some wiped out directly through human action.

    Martin said the fossil records show that the disappearance of many animals in Australia, Madagascar and North America started about the time that humans arrived at those sites. Gone from the natural North American environment, for instance, are mammoths, camels, giant sloths and saber-toothed tigers.

    "For tens of millions of years there were much larger animals on this continent," said Martin. "We have to settle now for deer, antelope and bison. But there was much more" before humans came.

    Miller said the most significant thing about the British study is that it makes a detailed survey of insects, specifically the butterfly, and finds that they are in decline.

    "They have good evidence of an insect population decline that is at a much higher rate than assumed in the literature," said Miller. "The butterfly may be a good indicator for what is happening to the other insects. We don't even know which factors in our changing environment is affecting the insects more."

    The study, conducted by a group of British scientists led by J.A. Thomas of the Natural Environment Research Council, analyzed data collected by an army of volunteers whom Pimm described in Science as "amateurs of a very high level of competence."

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/2004-03-18-wildlife-gone_x.htm
     
  2. Roc Paint

    Roc Paint Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2001
    Messages:
    22,329
    Likes Received:
    12,444
    Float like Peter Pan, sting like a bee doesn't sound right. :(
     
    #2 Roc Paint, Mar 18, 2004
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2004
  3. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    Adapt or die you pansy butterflies.
     
  4. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,969
    Likes Received:
    8,053
    After 100 years of Scientific Study in england, the cause of extinction was finally determined, their death was due to giant orange tags that had been stapled to their wings...and bad teeth.
     
  5. BobFinn*

    BobFinn* Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2000
    Messages:
    11,438
    Likes Received:
    6
    And if that wasn't enough to scare you, I bring you more news of DOOM!!!:cool:

    Updated 3/18/2004 2:10 PM

    NASA: Asteroid to get closer to Earth than any on record


    SAN DIEGO (AP) — As far as flying space rocks go, it's as close an encounter as mankind has ever had.
    A 100-foot diameter asteroid will pass within 26,500 miles of Earth on Thursday evening, the closest-ever brush on record by a space rock, NASA astronomers said.

    The asteroid's close flyby, first spied late Monday, poses no risk, NASA astronomers stressed.

    "It's a guaranteed miss," astronomer Paul Chodas, of the near-Earth object office at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said Wednesday.

    The asteroid, 2004 FH, was expected to make its closest approach at 5:08 p.m. ET, streaking over the southern Atlantic Ocean. It should be visible through binoculars to stargazers across the southern hemisphere, as well as throughout Asia and Europe, said astronomer Steve Chesley, also of JPL.

    Professional astronomers around the globe scrambled Wednesday to prepare for the flyby, which could provide an unprecedented chance to get a close look at the asteroid, he added. The asteroid will pass within the moon's orbit.

    Similarly sized asteroids are believed to come as close to Earth on average once every two years, but have always escaped detection.

    "The important thing is not that it's happening, but that we detected it," Chesley said.

    Astronomers found the asteroid late Monday during a routine survey carried out with a pair of telescopes in New Mexico funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Follow-up observations on Tuesday allowed them to pinpoint its orbit.

    "It immediately became clear it would pass very close by the Earth," Chesley said.

    Astronomers have not ruled out that the asteroid and our planet could meet again sometime in the future. If the two were to collide, the asteroid likely would disintegrate in the atmosphere, Chesley said.
     
  6. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,969
    Likes Received:
    8,053
    With 24 hours notice we could almost finish the Fantasy draft before mass extinction. Meanwhile, all the butterflies on Mars begin their migration back to Earth.
     
  7. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    At 5:08 p.m. Nasa urges everyone to duck...
     
  8. nyquil82

    nyquil82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,174
    Likes Received:
    3
    i offer two reasons for the bird and butterfly extinction.

    1. The bird and butterfly nations in the UK have legalized gay marriage, thus, just as people in the US feared, it has turned many of the species into homosexuals and thus, stemmed their ability to reproduce. But at least the birds and butterflies are in more vibrant colors.

    2. They've discovered free internet bird and butterfly p*rn.
     
  9. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,969
    Likes Received:
    8,053
  10. AntiSonic

    AntiSonic Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    8,318
    Likes Received:
    57
    Whoa, we had three days notice on this?! Methinks there should be more resources allocated to asteroid detection.
     
  11. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    Bob the T-Rex: Ah! It's just some doomsday plot! Asteroids, extinction, the whole mess - scientists just get paid to come up with this stuff. It's always, "we're destroying the earth with our own gasses! Oh no! Panic!" ... yadda, yadda, yadda, blah, blah, blah. It's not going to happen.

    Billy the Brontosaurus: Really, so no need to worry about asteroids and gasses and everyone dying?

    Bob the T-Rex: Nah, just make a joke about it and move on. Everyone takes this extinction crap way too seriously. We've been here forever!

    Billy the Brontosaurus: Gee whiz, thanks Bob! I feel so much better now!

    Bob the T-Rex: No problem Billy my boy! Feeling good is what's important!
     
  12. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,841
    As to the original thread topic, yes, the mass extinction is well under way.

    David Quammen has written about this with great eloquence and expertise. I recommend his essay "Weed Planet" in Harper's about six years ago or so.

    Here's a similar article printed in The Independent:

    The Weeds Shall Inherit the Earth
     
  13. wiws316

    wiws316 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    you know if the birds go, the insect population is gonna go WAY up. and thats not good news:(
     
  14. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,089
    Likes Received:
    6,640
    Ummm, how do they know they didn't count the same birds over and over? I mean, it could be even worse (number of birds left).
     
  15. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    Or not as bad. That is all we hear from enviros, doom and gloom. Trust me, the Earth is far cleaner than it was when the Cuyahoga River caught on fire and you couldn't fish out of the bay because of the mercury.
     
  16. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,841
    bama, did you read the article from the link I posted above? (maybe that's a rhetorical question). I know you've got it all figured out, but you'd be surprised what some of the facts show you.

    We've made progess, (your point taken about burning rivers, at least in some countries), and I'm not saying we can do anything too much better than we're already doing it, given that we have such an enormous population, but a mass extinction is underway, and we're causing it. Trust the facts.
     
  17. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,089
    Likes Received:
    6,640
    We used to beable to safley eat what we fished in the Half Moon Bay (Arabian Gulf). Now you have to be careful. The water got badly polluted during the Gulf War, Sadam...that b*stard!
     
  18. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    Change, extiction, adaptation..it's just the way life works. Asteroids, ice ages, tectonic movement, solar flares are all probably more dramatic agents of change than man but we do inhabit a closed system

    I don't think nature necessarily prefers men and butterflies over cockroaches or fungi. So if we like breathing and reproducing we probably out to be looking out for ourselves.
     
  19. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,841
    Yeah, I agree with this. You've got to be realistic about it, and as much as I adore wildlife and diverse speciation, I have to shrug at some level about all these other species biting the dust.

    The hand-wringing argument goes like this: the loss of genetic diversity on Earth is bad for the future of life on earth, since we will have fewer options for adopting to new catastrophes (fewer tools in the survival toolbox).

    But hey, if humans die off in something, why do we care if slime molds or snails live on? It's a weird question. Can we really say we care what happens once we're all gone as a species?
     

Share This Page