1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The salary cap and why the Parsons contract is the new normal

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Carl Herrera, Jul 10, 2014.

  1. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,574
    Here is a chart that, I think, goes a long way to explain why the Parsons contract is not crazy even though it is higher than, say, Nic Batum's contract. The chart shows where the NBA's salary cap is during its entire history:

    [​IMG]

    Notice that the NBA's cap number stagnated at around $58M for the last 6 seasons before jumping to $63M this year. The stagnation was a result of 1) the recession beginning in around 2008 and 2) the new CBA lowering player share of the revenue from 57% to 50%-- note that there was an agreement that the cap wouldn't dip down below $58M or else it would have moved downward in 2011.

    What happens now is that the NBA's revenue has finally risen sufficiently that even a 50% share results in a $63M cap, $4.3M+ more than the cap ever was under a 57% share. The cap is projected to go up to $66M next season and to $80M or so in 2016-17 due to a new national TV deal.

    So, this means that many of the contracts currently on the teams' books were signed in a very different economic environment, some even under different rules.

    When the cap was expected to remain flat (and maybe even go downwards before the result qof the lockout was known) while many of the larger contracts on teams' books go up each year by 4.5% or even more (in the case of Bird free agents and deals signed under the old CBA), teams have a harder time getting cap room. Now, with a 7%+ jump in cap number this season and more expected to come in the next two, the rate of increase in the cap is outstripping the rate of increase in the larger salaries remaining on teams' books. Moreover, with the new CBA shortening the allowed length of contracts, a higher % of contracts expire each season resulting in more teams having higher cap room and needing to retain or replace free agents.

    So, comparing the Parsons contract (or those signed by Hayward, Frye, Tucker, Bradley, Collison this year) to those signed even 2 or 3 seasons ago may not be all that useful. We are seeing the price in the market as a whole go up because total available FA money has gone up and is expected to continue going up in the near future (that is, the duration of many contracts to be signed today). Those guys mentioned above already got paid. And more $ is still out there for Ariza, Deng and the like.
     
    #1 Carl Herrera, Jul 10, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2014
    1 person likes this.
  2. micah1j

    micah1j Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    61
    Great post. I agree completely and posted similar (shorter) thoughts in Parsons related threads. 16 million for Parsons in the new norm in 2016. He might even opt out looking for more.
     
  3. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,860
    Likes Received:
    4,531
    So...we should match!
     
  4. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,707
    Likes Received:
    4,575
    There is no explanation for Parsons getting 25 percent of anyone's salary cap.
     
  5. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    125,946
    Likes Received:
    35,052
    Yep, and the cap is expected to rise to around 80m with the new TV deal.

    DD
     
  6. jordnnnn

    jordnnnn Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,105
    Likes Received:
    12,107
    Yeah with the cap jumps if you assume he stays the player he is right now then this year the number is not ideal. Next year it's more palatable and by the 3rd year I think it's right on the money.
     
  7. Shaq2Yao

    Shaq2Yao Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,543
    Likes Received:
    16,981
    Would still rather pay Parson $1M/per instead of $15M/per.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. FTW Rockets FTW

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,724
    Likes Received:
    21,397
    I know the value of money even though it's not mine so would still not pay Parsons all star / superstar money for a glue guy / role player that he is
     
  9. SmeggySmeg

    SmeggySmeg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    14,887
    Likes Received:
    123
    handsome is the best i can come up with :rolleyes:
     
  10. Dgn1

    Dgn1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    3,150
    Likes Received:
    1,361
    Carl has been on a roll lately, good post. The moons are perfectly aligned for Parson's. EVERYTHING has gone his way.
     
  11. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,973
    Likes Received:
    57,283
    And there is no explanation for the player option, and trade kickers. Cuban added those purely to screws with us. We must reject per precedent
     
  12. shastarocket

    shastarocket Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    13,773
    Likes Received:
    1,082
    I'm in the camp that if we sign Bosh, all will be forgiven.
     
  13. HighlightReel

    HighlightReel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2013
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    38
    It's crazy to even begin justifying why he's worth the max. Dude is overpaid.
     
  14. Karolik

    Karolik Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,405
    Likes Received:
    151
    FIFY ;)
     
  15. tycoonchip

    tycoonchip Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 1999
    Messages:
    7,165
    Likes Received:
    5,675
    Yes we will match the offer and you can bet your darn skippy he will wear a Houston uniform next season. Parsons deserves the money he gets. Has he slacked off defensively? Yes. But part of that has to do with Mchale's inability to draw up a proper defensive scheme. Our new assistant coach/ defensive coordinator will hopefully change all that. We got another superstar in Dwight and we were still first round exits. This team will find new blood to put in our mix but don't be surprised if alot of the other guys we have grown to love are gone. The trio of Parsons Harden and Howard is not broken. Everything else is though.
     
  16. RockingRox

    RockingRox Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    259
    Whatever the cap is, Parsons does not worth a max.

    He got a max because Cuban wants to screw the Rockets. That's exactly what the Knicks fans felt last year (Lin's contract).

    But Feigen just reported that should the Rockets get Bosh to sign max offer, Parsons would be matched.

    That would be 4 max contracts on a team roster. I salute Les for willing to do that.
     
  17. Karolik

    Karolik Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,405
    Likes Received:
    151
    [​IMG]
     
  18. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,073
    Likes Received:
    39,646
    That's a trippy chart, Carl. Thanks.
     
  19. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    56,969
    Likes Received:
    121,768
    Excellent thread, not the same recycled BS.

    The expected increase in the cap is certainly part of. I think a lot of it is that some teams fail to attract real star free agents and you do not draft or develop young players, you feel the need to over spend to get them. You see it in Sacramento with Evans, Dallas with Parsons and the Hayward offer.

    It isn't usually a good idea but sometimes you can overcome it. Batum WAS over paid and was a big part of Portland's success in the playoffs. If the Rockets match Parsons he could well have a huge playoff series.
     
  20. glimmertwins

    glimmertwins Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,272
    Likes Received:
    4,772
    This is the point I have been making that people seem to ignore. Thanks for spelling it out. A bad contract is one you can't move but Parsons contract is in line with what a player of his caliber will be making by the time his contract is ending.

    Also note because of the TV deal in two years, most stars will coincidentally be free agents that summer because no one wants to be locked in an "old salary cap" contract when there will be a bigger piece of the salary pie available to players. That's why guys like Parsons are willing to take 2 year deals with a 3rd year player option rather than a longer term deal.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now