1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Most Effective 5 Man Combination Overal Will Be?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Carl Herrera, Oct 29, 2008.

  1. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Of course, matchup and such things matter, but what combination of players do you think will prove most productive/effective over the course of the season?

    Edit: My thoughts:

    I think the best Rockets combination will likely involve Artest at the 4, to provide spacing. It will have Battier there for the extra defensive punch. It will most likely involve Rafer Alston-- it's been a trend that the team plays better with Rafer.

    An easy guess will be: Yao, Artest, Battier, McGrady, Alston. A combination that provides a good balance of offense, defense, shooting, size and quickness.

    I think it is more likely to be the following, though:

    Hayes, Artest, Battier, Barry, Aston. Ron will have to carry the burden of being the only one who creates his own shots, but I think this combo will run the motion offense well and defend like mad.

    Yep, I do think it possible-- or even somewhat likely-- that the best Rockets lineup will include neither of the max salary players.
     
    #1 Carl Herrera, Oct 29, 2008
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2008
  2. rox4lyf

    rox4lyf Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,944
    Likes Received:
    263
    Definitely could be the most efficient group we could put out there. We all saw how good our offense looked without TMac and how far we went without Yao. But I wouldn't say they'll be more successful than the eventual starting lineup adelman eventually decides on.

    There is no "Ewing" theory with our team for either Tmac or Yao as Bill Simmons would always like to put it. We need those guys both healthy and on the floor together to produce the wins that matter most, even if efficiency wise they might not be as good as the other lineup.
     
  3. fmullegun

    fmullegun Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    23
    Landry
    Artest
    TMAC
    YAO
    Rafer
     
  4. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,510
    Likes Received:
    59,002
    The most effective lineup will be the one that closes games the most; otherwise, you'll be saying Adelman is an idiot.

    As far as stats for lineups go at 82games.com, Sam Hinkie, Dir of Basketball Ops for the Rockets, reminds us in rockets.com's latest interview by Jason that lineup or individual numbers in small doses might mean the coach is only fielding that under advantageous matchups...which simply means the coach is smart to identify mismatches, not necessarily that the said player or lineup always creates a mismatch.

    bottomline: if the most effective lineup isn't closing the games, something is wrong with the coach.
     
  5. HeyDude

    HeyDude Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    43
    I dont know why but I think Hayes, Landry, Artest, TMAC, Barry would rock, if used correctly at small spurts. But small spurt doesnt meant it wont be important. They could turn a deficit into a lead or small lead into bigger lead.
     
  6. flipmode

    flipmode Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Messages:
    876
    Likes Received:
    65
    Rafer
    McGrady
    Artest
    Hayes
    Yao

    I'd prefer Hayes in the lineup so we don't lose offensive production in the 2nd unit:

    Head
    Wafer
    Barry
    Landry/Scola
    Dorsey
     
  7. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    There seems to be a contradiction here. You say the coach is smart to identify advantageous matchups during the course of the game, but in the end he should use the most effective lineup (apparently) without regard to matchups.

    If it's a winning strategy to recognize advantageous matchup during the game, why not keep that same philosophy at the end when it counts?
     
  8. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    We've got several strong combinations that can really take advantage of matchups and situations:

    Big:
    Yao-Scola-Landry-Artest-Barry

    Small:
    Scola-Artest-McGrady-Head-Alston

    Defense:
    Yao-Artest-Battier-McGrady-Alston (dangerous zone with Yao anchoring)

    Offense:
    Scola-Landry-Artest-McGrady-Alston

    Shooters:
    Scola-Artest-Battier-McGrady-Barry

    We've finally what looks like a DEEP team, with a fantastic rotation that allows us to adapt to any style we face. No more being unable to handle frontcourts like we see with the Jazz, Celtics, or Lakers. Our bench of Landry, Battier, Hayes, (Brooks? Head?) and Barry really has me excited.

    We've got several STUD stoppers (Hayes, Artest, Battier). We've got numerous guys that can step in and score in a supporting role each night. If we can get 70 games each out of our big 3, and are at full strength come April....I really like our chances to make noise.
     
  9. Yao4REAL

    Yao4REAL Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    3,856
    Likes Received:
    133
    The most effective deadly combination is:

    Barry
    Tmac
    Battier
    Artest
    Yao

    You have Barry and Battier (team best outside shooters) to knock down 3s when they try to double Yao or Tmac or Artest.

    You have deadly combo of defenders with Battier and Artest.

    When an offense that operate through Tmac and Yao and Artest...you don't need a TRUE PG, you just need someone to knock down 3 and make them pay.
     
  10. joesr

    joesr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,772
    Likes Received:
    115
    Offense

    Barry
    Tmac
    Artest
    Scolandry (who ever is hot that day so depends)
    Yao

    Defense

    Alston
    Artest
    Battier
    Hayes
    Yao
     
  11. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,270
    Likes Received:
    13,733
    Alston
    McGrady
    Battier
    Hayes
    Yao
     
  12. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    JVG, is that you?
     
  13. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,510
    Likes Received:
    59,002
    no contradiction. The most effective lineup is the one the coach uses to close games the most...that is, the one that gives you a winning advantage the most. Never said you can't close with other lineups for special situations.

    Don't really see how anyone can argue with this unless they intend to argue with the coach about the best 5-man lineup. I was merely pointing out this the OP's question is more about guessing which lineup Adelman will play the most in the 4th quarters.
     
  14. redao

    redao Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    58
    put 3 offensive holes and a 36 year old and a rap singer in one lineup?
     
  15. flamingdts

    flamingdts Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    4,729
    I don't know about you guys, but when Brooks improve his court vision, he'll probably be in one of the most effective 5 man combination. He has high shooting accuracy + athletism + speed. He is either one of the fastest or if not the fastest player in the league. Doesn't matter if Brooks has bad handles, if he can develop better court vision, he is gauranteed to draw double teams because he will always beat his man off the dribble with his speed.

    Love doing that in 2K9 :p , Brooks always draw double team.
     
  16. Alvin Choo

    Alvin Choo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,466
    Likes Received:
    152
    any line-up with rafer is not effective.....
     
  17. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Based on the last couple season, that statement can't be any more wrong.
     
  18. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    I see, ok.
     
  19. YallMean

    YallMean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    14,284
    Likes Received:
    3,815
    Artest at 4? Against Utah, yes, but most of the west teams are playing two bigs these days. I think it's too much to ask from Artest to keep with two Gasols, Oberto, Amare ...
     
  20. chow_yun_fat

    chow_yun_fat Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,115
    Likes Received:
    47
    aaron brooks
    luther head
    rafer alston
    joey dorsey
    von wafer
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now