1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Bookie of Virtue

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by MR. MEOWGI, May 2, 2003.

  1. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    This is great!
    (Sorry if this has already been posted...)


    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0306.green.html

    The Bookie of Virtue
    William J. Bennett has made millions lecturing people on morality--and blown it on gambling.

    By Joshua Green
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "We should know that too much of anything, even a good thing, may prove to be our undoing...[We] need ... to set definite boundaries on our appetites."

    --The Book of Virtues, by William J. Bennett

    No person can be more rightly credited with making morality and personal responsibility an integral part of the political debate than William J. Bennett. For more than 20 years, as a writer, speaker, government official, and political operative, Bennett has been a commanding general in the culture wars. As Ronald Reagan's chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, he was the scourge of academic permissiveness. Later, as Reagan's secretary of education, he excoriated schools and students for failing to set and meet high standards. As drug czar under George H.W. Bush, he applied a get-tough approach to drug use, arguing that individuals have a moral responsibility to own up to their addiction. Upon leaving public office, Bennett wrote The Book of Virtues, a compendium of parables snatched up by millions of parents and teachers across the political spectrum. Bennett's crusading ideals have been adopted by politicians of both parties, and implemented in such programs as character education classes in public schools--a testament to his impact.

    But Bennett, a devout Catholic, has always been more Old Testament than New. Even many who sympathize with his concerns find his combative style haughty and unforgiving. Democrats in particular object to his partisan sermonizing, which portrays liberals as inherently less moral than conservatives, more given to excusing personal weaknesses, and unwilling to confront the vices that destroy families. During the impeachment of Bill Clinton, Bennett was among the president's most unrelenting detractors. His book, The Death of Outrage, decried, among other things, the public's failure to take Clinton's sins more seriously.

    His relentless effort to push Americans to do good has enabled Bennett to do extremely well. His best-selling The Book of Virtues spawned an entire cottage industry, from children's books to merchandizing tie-ins to a PBS cartoon series. Bennett commands $50,000 per appearance on the lecture circuit and has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants from such conservative benefactors as the Scaife and John M. Olin foundations.

    Few vices have escaped Bennett's withering scorn. He has opined on everything from drinking to "homosexual unions" to "The Ricki Lake Show" to wife-swapping. There is one, however, that has largely escaped Bennett's wrath: gambling. This is a notable omission, since on this issue morality and public policy are deeply intertwined. During Bennett's years as a public figure, casinos, once restricted to Nevada and New Jersey, have expanded to 28 states, and the number continues to grow. In Maryland, where Bennett lives, the newly elected Republican governor Robert Ehrlich is trying to introduce slot machines to fill revenue shortfalls. As gambling spreads, so do its associated problems. Heavy gambling, like drug use, can lead to divorce, domestic violence, child abuse, and bankruptcy. According to a 1998 study commissioned by the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, residents within 50 miles of a casino are twice as likely to be classified as "problem" or "pathological" gamblers than those who live further away.

    If Bennett hasn't spoken out more forcefully on an issue that would seem tailor-made for him, perhaps it's because he is himself a heavy gambler. Indeed, in recent weeks word has circulated among Washington conservatives that his wagering could be a real problem. They have reason for concern. The Washington Monthly and Newsweek have learned that over the last decade Bennett has made dozens of trips to casinos in Atlantic City and Las Vegas, where he is a "preferred customer" at several of them, and sources and documents provided to The Washington Monthly put his total losses at more than $8 million.

    "I don't play the 'milk money.'"

    Bennett has been a high-roller since at least the early 1990s. A review of one 18-month stretch of gambling showed him visiting casinos, often for two or three days at a time (and enjoying a line of credit of at least $200,000 at several of them). Bennett likes to be discreet. "He'll usually call a host and let us know when he's coming," says one source. "We can limo him in. He prefers the high-limit room, where he's less likely to be seen and where he can play the $500-a-pull slots. He usually plays very late at night or early in the morning--usually between midnight and 6 a.m." The documents show that in one two-month period, Bennett wired more than $1.4 million to cover losses. His desire for privacy is evident in his customer profile at one casino, which lists as his residence the address for Empower.org (the Web site of Empower America, the non-profit group Bennett co-chairs). Typed across the form are the words: "NO CONTACT AT RES OR BIZ!!!"

    Bennett's gambling has not totally escaped public notice. In 1998, The Washington Times reported in a light-hearted front-page feature story that he plays low-stakes poker with a group of prominent conservatives, including Robert Bork, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist. A year later, the same paper reported that Bennett had been spotted at the new Mirage Resorts Bellagio casino in Las Vegas, where he was reputed to have won a $200,000 jackpot. Bennett admitted to the Times that he had visited the casino, but denied winning $200,000. Documents show that, in fact, he won a $25,000 jackpot on that visit--but left the casino down $625,000.

    Bennett--who gambled throughout Clinton's impeachment--has continued this pattern in subsequent years. On July 12 of last year, for instance, Bennett lost $340,000 at Caesar's Boardwalk Regency in Atlantic City. And just three weeks ago, on April 5 and 6, he lost more than $500,000 at the Bellagio in Las Vegas. "There's a term in the trade for this kind of gambler," says a casino source who has witnessed Bennett at the high-limit slots in the wee hours. "We call them losers."

    Asked by Newsweek columnist and Washington Monthly contributing editor Jonathan Alter to comment on the reports, Bennett admitted that he gambles but not that he has ended up behind. "I play fairly high stakes. I adhere to the law. I don't play the 'milk money.' I don't put my family at risk, and I don't owe anyone anything." The documents offer no reason to contradict Bennett on these points. Bennett claims he's beaten the odds: "Over 10 years, I'd say I've come out pretty close to even."

    "You can roll up and down a lot in one day, as we have on many occasions," Bennett explains. "You may cycle several hundred thousand dollars in an evening and net out only a few thousand."

    "I've made a lot of money [in book sales, speaking fees and other business ventures] and I've won a lot of money," adds Bennett. "When I win, I usually give at least a chunk of it away [to charity]. I report everything to the IRS."

    But the documents show only a few occasions when he turns in chips worth $30,000 or $40,000 at the end of an evening. Most of the time, he draws down his line of credit, often substantially. A casino source, hearing of Bennett's claim to breaking even on slots over 10 years, just laughed.

    "You don't see what I walk away with," Bennett says. "They [casinos] don't want you to see it."

    Explaining his approach, Bennett says: "I've been a 'machine person' [slot machines and video poker]. When I go to the tables, people talk--and they want to talk about politics. I don't want that. I do this for three hours to relax." He says he was in Las Vegas in April for dinner with the former governor of Nevada and gambled while he was there.

    Bennett says he has made no secret of his gambling. "I've gambled all my life and it's never been a moral issue with me. I liked church bingo when I was growing up. I've been a poker player."



    But while Bennett's poker playing and occasional Vegas jaunt are known to some Washington conservatives, his high-stakes habit comes as a surprise to many friends. "We knew he went out there [to Las Vegas] sometimes, but at that level? Wow!" said one longtime associate of Bennett.

    Despite his personal appetites, Bennett and his organization, Empower America, oppose the extension of casino gambling in the states. In a recent editorial, his Empower America co-chair Jack Kemp inveighed against lawmakers who "pollute our society with a slot machine on every corner." The group recently published an Index of Leading Cultural Indicators, with an introduction written by Bennett, that reports 5.5 million American adults as "problem" or "pathological" gamblers. Bennett says he is neither because his habit does not disrupt his family life.

    When reminded of studies that link heavy gambling to divorce, bankruptcy, domestic abuse, and other family problems he has widely decried, Bennett compared the situation to alcohol.

    "I view it as drinking," Bennett says. "If you can't handle it, don't do it."

    Bennett is a wealthy man and may be able to handle losses of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. Of course, as the nation's leading spokesman on virtue and personal responsibility, Bennett's gambling complicates his public role. Moreover, it has already exacted a cost. Like him or hate him, William Bennett is one of the few public figures with a proven ability to influence public policy by speaking out. By furtively indulging in a costly vice that destroys millions of lives and families across the nation, Bennett has profoundly undermined the credibility of his word on this moral issue.

    Reporting assistance provided by Robert W. J. Fisk, Soyoung Ho, and Brent Kendall.
     
  2. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    really, that's interesting.
     
  3. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,100
    Likes Received:
    447
    What were you expecting? I don't think some people want to risk trying to defend this guy. He's an ass though, I'm just tired of talking about two faced politicians because they are the norm.
     
  4. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let's see if I can get some facts straight.

    Bill Bennett readily admits that he is a high stakes gambler.

    Bill Bennett has not criticized gambling as being immoral in the past.

    Bill Bennett hasn't hurt anybody because of his gambling. In fact, he has tremendous earning power (50 k an appearance).

    Joshua Green has written a hatchet piece meant to harm Bill Bennett somehow. Green insinuates that Bennett is a hypocrite because Bennett gambles, yet Bennett endorses gambling as being moral. Since there is no hypocrisy, and Green does not stipulate that gambling is immoral, then what is the point of this story?

    *Idle gossip*
     
  5. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Defend him against what??
     
  6. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    It is 3 in the morining! I just thought it was wonderfl that Mr. Moralitty (too drunk to type) has his own vice. i love it. We are all hypocritts. But the loudest are the most comic. Makes me feel good. That was my whole point. Just a slice of life. Me go night night to Hall and Oates now...
     
  7. BmwM3

    BmwM3 Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,896
    Likes Received:
    255
    OMG!!LOL!! Now that's funny.:D
     
  8. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Drunk boy. Bennett is an admitted gambler who played church bingo. Since he has never said that gambling is immoral, he cannot be a hypocrite on this issue.

    Why am I typing messages to drunk people?

    Oh yeah, I am drunk.
     
  9. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,878
    Likes Received:
    3,746
    That's silly, he's not the one to decide if it is immoral. William Bennent is not God or society. If he is doing something his society deems immoral while preaching morals he is wrong.
     
  10. RunninRaven

    RunninRaven Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2000
    Messages:
    15,281
    Likes Received:
    3,245
    If it is determined by God that gambling is immoral, then yes, he is doing wrong. But if he himself does not believe it is immoral, then he is not a hypocrite. They are two very different things.
     
  11. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,878
    Likes Received:
    3,746
    Okay, we're arguing semantics, you're right, he is not a hypocrite if you're specifically talk about gambling. He is still wrong.
     
    #11 pgabriel, May 3, 2003
    Last edited: May 3, 2003
  12. RIET

    RIET Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,916
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't understand your logic.

    So if someone preaches morality but does not believe p*rnography is immoral and enjoys p*rn, then he's not a hypocrite?

    Who determines what's moral or immoral?

    If youre saying it's the individual, then Bill Bennet shouldn't be telling other people what's good or bad.
     
  13. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,789
    Likes Received:
    16,438
    That's silly, he's not the one to decide if it is immoral. William Bennent is not God or society. If he is doing something his society deems immoral while preaching morals he is wrong.

    When did society deem gambling to be immoral?
     
  14. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand your logic, but I think you need to think less in terms of rigid "Southern Baptist" type morality (no drinking, dancing, or gambling!), and more in terms of how a behavior impacts innocent bystanders and significant others.

    If Bennett's gambling is hurting his family, then he would be a hypocrite. The only evidence I see is that Bennett has plenty of money and impressive earning power. He appears to be an excellent provider.

    *apologies to any Southern Baptists who drink and dance*
     
  15. Heretic

    Heretic Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gambling is fun if you keep within your means.
    Same with strip clubs, pre-marital sex, drugs, and all sorts of other vices that are deemed immoral by people like Bill Bennett.
     
  16. RunninRaven

    RunninRaven Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2000
    Messages:
    15,281
    Likes Received:
    3,245
    My logic is exactly this:

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypocrisy&r=3

    hy·poc·ri·sy ( P ) Pronunciation Key (h-pkr-s)
    n. pl. hy·poc·ri·sies
    The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.
    An act or instance of such falseness.

    Hypocrisy has little to nothing to do with what other people consider immoral. Hypocrisy is saying one thing and doing another. Had this man been saying that gambling was immoral, and then gone out and gambled, then he would be a hypocrite. Whether he is immoral for gambling is for each person to decide on his or her own.

    As to your p*rn example, if we are going by the definition of the word "hypocrisy", then no, he is not a hypocrite if he enjoys p*rn but doesn't feel it is immoral.
     
  17. RIET

    RIET Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,916
    Likes Received:
    1
    What youre really doing is narrowing the scope of what his "beliefs, feelings, or virtues" are.

    If I oppose smoking but I smoke then Im a hypocrite. I am not a hypocrite if I enjoy p*rn, drinking, gambling etc.

    However, if I broaden the scope and write a Book of Virtues, then I am advocating living a virtuous life that excludes all vices.

    Many people consider gambling a vice.

    The fact he could be against drinking, smoking, premarital sex, etc.....and yet does not consider gambling a vice is too convenient.

    On the one hand youre against sin. Then you narrow the definition of sin to exclude your own vices. Are you still advocating against sin? Are you still a virtuous man in the broad sense?
     
  18. RunninRaven

    RunninRaven Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2000
    Messages:
    15,281
    Likes Received:
    3,245
    You are discussing things that I am not even touching on. Whether you think that gambling is immoral, or that he just narrows his view of vices to match his own has nothing to do with what I was talking about, which is whether or not he is a hypocrite for this particular issue of gambling. Sure, saying gambling is moral while drinking, smoking, etc. is not is definitely convenient, but it is not hypocritical.
     
  19. RIET

    RIET Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,916
    Likes Received:
    1
    It isn't hypocritical if youre the average Joe.

    It is hypocritical for a man seen as a paragon for virtue.

    How can you be advocating against vices while engaging in an activity that many consider to be a vice?

    The fact he does not view it as a vice is irrelvant. He is still engaging in an activity that men of virtue would avoid.
     
  20. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think its hilarious he claims to be ahead of the game with slots. Funny I've never heard of him winning one of the big jackpots.

    He's not a hypocrite, gambling is a virtue. :)
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now