Trump on Biden... "He's following the radical left agenda: take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God. He's against God, he's against guns." None of this happened the past 4 years. So do you agree that Trump's whole rhetoric was a lie?
Also I forgot to ask again since you still haven't answered. Is saying that migrants poison the blood of this country Nazi race science rhetoric?
The Democrats shouldn’t sink to Trump’s level of trying to overturn a fair election. Trust that the system of checks and balances that we have will be enough to prevent a descent into an anti-democratic hellscape. That entails recognizing the threats against our democratic institutions and being vigilant about protecting them.
If Trump is Hitler, a Nazi or an existential threat to Democracy… with millions of lives at stake… shouldn’t every extremity be on the table?
Do you ever actually reply to the content of the words people type for you? Can you address the arguments we are specially making?
Can you read? We've answered why we don't commit violence because a national leader who expresses Hitlerian race science rhetoric won a presidential election. We examples it. We've discussed about the concept of a robust checks and balance system that developed over multiple centuries. We explained that there are fears of a national leader who says Hitlerian race science rhetoric beyond the most worst case scenario of a fascist being elected which is a new Nazi style regime that does a Holocaust. There is a lot of other stuff before that level of extreme fascism people are worried about. People can be rationally worried about a large chunk of the country defending Nazi level race science rhetoric coming from a national leader who won a election. That is worrying. To believe that you can only worry or be concerned about a new administration only because they might create the new FourthbTeich is extremely absurd and a bad faith argument. We've made these points to you and you ask the same question without once answering this question. Is saying that migrants poison the blood of a country Nazi race science rhetoric? Do you need me to illustrate this with a pop up picture book so you can retain the information I just typed and actually respond to the content of what I typed? Either I have to break down to you at a kindergartner level or you need to admit you are asking these questions in bad faith. Which one is it? You dumb or insincere?
Because you don’t really believe Trump is an existential threat to Democracy. You don’t really believe Trump is Hitler. You don’t really believe Trump is a Nazi. Otherwise every extremity would be justified. Isn’t that right? You’d do more then key boarding fights right?
A lot of people answered your question. You asked the same question yesterday and I gave the same answer without you addressing any of the points from my answer and did a hard reset of your brain to pretend I never answered. You are asked ng questions people have answered 20 times by now So are you dumb and I need to do a pop up picture book for you or are you just insincere? There are really only two options here bud.
If you believed Trump was a believer of nazi race science wouldn’t you support every extremity to keep him from governing?
Do you believe saying that migrants poisoning the blood of our country as Nazi race science type rhetoric? The level of sincerity and ideological commitment Trump has to Nazi race science is irrelevant to the question. Does it matter when he takes office? Obviously because the level of ideological commitment also has a role to play in how far Trump is willing to go. But when it comes to being concrete that millions of Americans defend and vote for a man who openly expressed Nazi race science rhetoric, the amount of dedication Turno has to those beliefs is irrelevant. Obviously Trump believes saying that stuff helps motivate his base. So either he has extreme sincerity and deploy held Nazi convictions or he believes Nazi convictions sells well to his base which is just as frightening.
Trump won an election. We all believe he won a fair and free election. I think this is the difference. Now if he does the horrible things he says he will do...who knows. I imagine he's going to create the same division and chaos he caused last time that got him to be one of the most unpopular presidents of all time and voted out of office. But you are basically scolding people on the left for giving Trump a chance lol.
I'm speaking for myself when you've asked this same question to me where I wasted time explaining my answer and you ignoring every aspect of it and just restating that question to me and others repeatedly. It's irrelevant who answers your repeated question. What matters is multiple people have already answered it and you don't address the answers and just restate your question again... Almost like a AI chat bot working through a loop.
It's not even about giving Trump a chance. It's more about the fact of respecting the election process.
So you don’t really believe Trump is Hitler, a Nazi or an existential threat to Democracy. Because if you really believed that the only rationale position to take would be to advocate any and all measures to prevent him governing… It was all bad faith hot air from the leftists… shocking
You aren't doing a good job convincing people you aren't a AI chat bot. People have answered this question to you repeatedly. You never address any of the points of those answers to explain why those answers aren't sufficient for you. You just restate the question pretending those replies don't exist.
You’re claiming its reasonable to “respect the result of an election” for a Hilterite, Nazi, Existential threat to Democracy? Millions and millions of lives are at stake but if he won the electoral college its ok?? Lol
