1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Tennessean: mine enriched Gore, scarred land

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Mar 18, 2007.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,386
    Likes Received:
    9,302
    this is inconvenient:

    "Even Gore noted in his letter that, according to Scorecard, “pollution releases from the mine in 2002 placed it among the ‘dirtiest/worst facilities’ in the U.S.”

    http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070318/NEWS01/70316074

    [rquoter]CARTHAGE, Tenn. - Al Gore has profited from zinc mining that has released millions of pounds of potentially toxic substances near his farmstead, but there is no evidence the mine has caused serious damage to the environment in the area or threatened the health of his neighbors.

    Two massive white mountains of leftover rock waste are evidence of three decades of mining that earned Gore more than $500,000 in royalty payments for the mineral rights to his property.


    New owners plan to start mining again later this year, after nearly four years of inactivity. In addition to bringing 250 much-needed jobs to rural Middle Tennessee, mine owners will resume paying royalties to some residents who, like Gore, own land adjacent to the mine and lease access to the zinc under their property.

    Gore has yet to be approached by the new owner, Strategic Resource Acquisition, said his spokeswoman Kalee Kreider, and he and wife, Tipper, have not decided whether they will renew their lease. It was terminated when the mine closed in 2003.

    Last week, Gore sent a letter asking the company to work with Earthworks, a national environmental group, to make sure the operation doesn’t damage the environment.

    “We would like for you to engage with us in a process to ensure that the mine becomes a global example of environmental best practices,” Gore wrote.

    Victor Wyprysky, the company’s president and chief executive officer, did not respond to requests for comment on the letter.

    The letter was sent the week after The Tennessean’s Washington bureau posed questions to the former vice president about his involvement with the mine.

    Previous mine owners released toxic substances into waterways above the allowable levels several times in the eight years before the mine closed.

    But state regulators consider those permit violations minor, and monitoring reports provide a clean bill of health for the surface water in the area. Community leaders and health officials recall no health problems ever associated with the mining.

    But now that the mine is reopening and Gore’s status as an environmentalist has grown, some of Gore’s neighbors see a conflict between the mining and his moral call for environmental activism.

    “Mining is not exactly synonymous with being green, is it?” said John Mullins, who lives in nearby Cookeville. A conservative, Mullins welcomes the resumption of mining for the benefits it will bring the community. But he says Gore’s view that global warming is a certainty is arrogant and that by being connected to mining, Gore is not “walking the walk.”

    At the same time, the Caney Fork Watershed Association, which works to conserve and improve the waterways near the mine, has heard no concerns from its members about the mine’s reopening.

    “The operation has a record of vigilance in not operating to harm the environment, and we certainly hope that the renewed operation will maintain this record,” John Harwood, with the association, said in a written response to questions. “It is important that this waste material … be permanently secured from causing environmental contamination.”

    And Earthworks president and chief executive Stephen D’Esposito said Gore’s involvement with mining doesn’t bother him “in any way, shape or form.”
    “We are going to have mining. The question is doing it in the right place and the right way,” said D’Esposito, who has not studied the Carthage mines.

    Gore’s mining history

    Al Gore Jr.’s involvement in mining can be traced to Sept. 22, 1973.

    Former U.S. Sen. Albert Gore Sr. bought about 88 acres along the Caney Fork River from Occidental Minerals, a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum, for $160,000. Included in the deal was the subsurface area. The rights to the minerals below ground were then leased back to Occidental.

    On the same day, Gore Sr. sold the land and subsurface area to his 25-year-old son and daughter-in-law for $140,000. The mineral lease to Occidental was put in their names.

    Kreider said the terms of the 30-year agreement provided the Gores “no legal recourse” even if they had wanted to cancel it, Kreider said.

    The Gores, she said, would not comment on whether they tried to pursue legal action to void the lease. “There is a certain zone of privacy once people go into private life.”

    Gore received $20,000 a year for 27 years and $10,000 a year for three years, making a total of $570,000 in lease payments. Kreider said the Gores never considered selling the land.

    She said the lease has to be viewed in a “1973 context, not a 2007 context.”

    “There was a different environmental sensibility about all sorts of things,” she said.

    Emission from the mine

    The mine is a complex of several interconnected sites known as the Gordonsville Mine and Mill, the Cumberland Mine and the Elmwood Mine, which is the closest to Gore’s property. In addition, previous mine owners operated a refining plant in Clarksville.

    Through the years, mining operations expanded as the facilities went through several ownership and name changes. Horizontal shafts, called drifts, extend under the Gore property, Kreider said, although the Gores don’t know their number and location.

    By 1983, the Elmwood-Gordonsville complex was the largest zinc-producing mine in the country and Tennessee the largest zinc-producing state. The Elmwood-Gordonsville mine kept the title every year until 1990, except for 1984.

    Zinc is used primarily to protect steel from corrosion. Other metals released during the mining process - such as lead, mercury and copper - are necessary to a modern economy. But human exposure to high levels of these metals can cause health problems.

    The Environmental Protection Agency began reporting toxic releases from metal mining operations for the first time in 1998. The mining industry objected to being included in the reports because of the sheer size of the emission numbers and the fact that much of what is reported is the naturally occurring substance - in this case zinc - that is being mined.

    In the five-year period from 1998 to 2003, before the mines were shuttered, 16.6 million pounds of toxic substances were released into the air, water and land at the Gordonsville site, according to the EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory data, and 2.6 million pounds were released at the Cumberland site. Most of that was the zinc pulled from ground during mining.

    In its last year of full operation in 2002, the Gordonsville-Cumberland mines ranked 22nd among all metal mining operations in the U.S., with about 4.1 million pounds of toxic releases. The top releasing mine, Red Dog Mine in Alaska, emitted about 482 million pounds that year. In 2002, Smith County ranked 39th out of more than 3,000 U.S. counties for lead compound releases and 21st for cadmium releases, according to tallies by Scorecard, a Web site run by environmentalists that compiles federal data.

    Even Gore noted in his letter that, according to Scorecard, “pollution releases from the mine in 2002 placed it among the ‘dirtiest/worst facilities’ in the U.S.”

    How much was released in the previous quarter century when the mines were in their heyday is unknown.

    The Clarksville processing plant emitted more than 26 million pounds of pollutants in 2004, ranking Montgomery County 21st among all U.S. counties for the amount of toxic releases discharged into the environment.

    Water discharge violations

    While all the sites have systems in place to protect nearby rivers and streams, the state discharge permit records for the Carthage area mines show several examples in recent years of releases of toxic substances into waterways above the allowable levels set under the federal Clean Water Act. The majority of samples taken found acceptable levels of the various substances being tested.

    Violations cited were:

    • Gordonsville Mine and Mill. Sampling at one site where the mine discharges into a tributary of the Caney Fork River found 23 violations of the limit on zinc levels out of 30 samples taken between October 1995 and August 2000, according to permit documents. Nineteen of those readings above permit limits occurred between December 1995 and March 1997 and caused the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation to issue three notices of violation to Savage Zinc Inc., the mine owner then.

    Because the company worked to correct the problem, state officials said the department did not take tougher action such as a fine. The other four violations, between January 1998 and August 2000, were considered minor, officials said. Two other notices of violation were issued in 1997 for zinc limit violations at a nearby discharge point.

    Two other zinc violations were found in samples in 2003; one for high levels of solids that year and in 2004; and one for copper in a 2003 sample.

    • Elmwood Mine. State inspectors found a permit violation in January 2000 that was caused when a valve failure on a pipe carrying lime slurry from the Gordonsville mine caused it to bypass a treatment structure and empty into a tributary of the Caney Fork. Higher than permitted zinc levels were found in one sample each in 2000 and 2001.

    • Cumberland Mine. Violations of the solids levels were found twice in 2002, and one sample that year contained excessive zinc.

    “We think those violations (are) considered minor,” said Paul Schmierbach, environmental program manager for the state’s Division of Water Pollution Control.

    The most recent permit for the Clarksville plant includes no permit violations. But very high zinc levels were found in many samples taken from 2001 to 2005 at two sites where storm water flowed into a tributary of the Cumberland River. The Clarksville permit did not set limits for storm water runoff so those were not counted as violations.

    Water quality OK, for now

    Test samples taken of the surface water in the Caney Fork and Cumberland rivers near the mine sites in recent years show no readings of dangerous substances above the legal limits.

    “I don’t see anything here that indicates a water quality issue,” said Greg Denton, manager of the planning and standards section in the Division of Water Pollution Control, after reviewing testing data compiled by The Tennessean’s Washington bureau.

    And state and county health officials, along with community leaders, can recall no reports of unusual health problems in the area.

    At the same time, the state counts the two water systems in Smith County that draw from the Caney Fork and Cumberland downstream from the mines as highly susceptible for contamination, according to the Tennessee Source Water Assessment Report issued in August 2003, the most recent report done.

    That is in part because of the mines and other facilities that discharge into the rivers, according to the report. The report scored nearly half of the state’s 457 community water sources as having “high susceptibility” for contamination.

    In addition, state environmental officials said in a 2006 report that Tennessee needs a more accurate picture of the health of its underground water supply.

    According to the report, the state:

    • Has not done a systematic statewide study of its aquifers.

    • Requires that public water systems sample only the treated water they provide to customers, not raw ground water samples.

    • Does not require routine sampling of private wells and springs.

    Smith Utility District, one of the two water treatment plants in the area, draws from the Caney Fork, which Gore used as a backdrop in his Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth. The other, Carthage Water System, takes its water from the Cumberland.

    Only a few violations of safe drinking water regulations have been found in recent years during tests at the Smith, Carthage and other water systems in the area. Most are monitoring violations, and the only health-related ones are for high levels of the chemicals used to disinfect the water.

    Marcus Kemp, plant and distribution superintendent for the Smith Utility District plant, said he never had problems with discharges from the mines during his 28 years with the district, nor has Don Taylor, who runs the Carthage water plant.

    Still, Kemp is concerned about what will happen when the new owners pump out the water that has filled the mine since it was shut down.

    “That is going to be a different issue,” Kemp said of the restart of mining. “Water went into all the cracks and crevices.”

    Mining set to restart

    Community leaders see no problem with Gore, or the hundreds of other landowners in the area, reaping the benefits of owning property rich in zinc. In 2002, a previous mine owner held 355 leases in the area, totaling 16,339 acres, or more than 25.5 square miles.

    “I don’t think he would want to stand in the way of economic development of a community,” said Michael Nesbitt, mayor of Smith County, where the mines are located.

    Nesbitt and others are excited about the jobs the mine will create for some of the county’s nearly 19,000 people whose per capita personal income was below the state’s in 2003, the most recent county data available.

    Strategic Resource Acquisition, the Canadian company that will operate under the name Mid-Tennessee Zinc, estimates it will take a year to reactivate the mines. Mining itself should begin in the third quarter of this year, said Wyprysky, the CEO. The mill should begin putting out ore ready for shipping to refining plants in the first quarter of 2008.

    In an interview prior to Gore’s letter being sent, Wyprysky declined a request for a tour of the mining sites and declined to comment on their connection to Gore. He said the company was still in the process of negotiating lease agreements with the surrounding property owners.

    The Gores won’t speculate on whether they will refuse to renew their lease if the new owners don’t follow their request to work with the environmental group, Kreider said. They do plan, she said, to encourage their neighbors to join their effort.

    Also to be decided is what to do about the leases on two parcels owned by Albert Gore Sr., which Gore eventually will inherit when his parents’ estates are settled.

    The company said the mine already has produced 2.6 billion pounds of zinc metal, and still contains 26 million tons of zinc material containing
    3.25 percent zinc.

    That means that mining there could continue for years, creating an ongoing environmental threat to Gore and his neighbors in the rolling hills of Middle Tennessee.

    “The real protection,” said Harwood of the Caney Fork Watershed Association, “lies in the good faith and diligence of the mine operators, and of the state regulators.”[/rquoter]
     
  2. mateo

    mateo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,968
    Likes Received:
    292
    Well obviously this makes global warming nonexistent..... :(
     
  3. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Come on now, basso. You know that Gore says a lot of good things for the environment. That makes up for anything he can do.
     
  4. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,847
    Likes Received:
    41,332
    wow, looks like he was guilty of being born into a family that owned some mineral rights for an area, leased those rights with a non-voidable lease in his name, and the result was a mine that operated for years and committed no major environmental violations.

    Now he has the gall to try to ensure that the mine remains clean.

    Shameful.

    If you don't live in a tree, everything you say about the environment IS BULLSH-T AND NOT TRUE!!!
     
  5. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,594
    Likes Received:
    6,570
    This just reinforces that Gore is a complete hypocrite and has no credibility. I can't believe there are so many stupid people on this earth that take what he says as legitimate. Eh, I guess we need a lower class in society.
     
  6. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,198
    Likes Received:
    15,367
    You are truly a slimy human being, basso. After you were unable to slide your previous slanderous ‘documentary’ you apparently have decided that no tactic is to low for you and that character assassination was the way to proceed. I used to have a reasonable amount of respect you, but maybe that was just because I was comparing you were in bigtexxx and Trader_Jorge. I am disappointed that you don't have any more scruples than those two, just a disingenuous used-car salesman facade to hide the rage, narcissism, and greed.

    With some people I at least believe that their amalgamated religious/political faith means they don’t really understand the issues with global warming. I get the general impression that you probably understand, but don’t mind turning the world into a desert if it is profitable for you to do so.

    I'm not sure that you noticed the part where the lease was given to him by his father and that when he got it he had absolutely no way to stop Occidental?

    [rquoter]
    Former U.S. Sen. Albert Gore Sr. bought about 88 acres along the Caney Fork River from Occidental Minerals, a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum, for $160,000. Included in the deal was the subsurface area. The rights to the minerals below ground were then leased back to Occidental.

    On the same day, Gore Sr. sold the land and subsurface area to his 25-year-old son and daughter-in-law for $140,000. The mineral lease to Occidental was put in their names.

    Kreider said the terms of the 30-year agreement provided the Gores “no legal recourse” even if they had wanted to cancel it, Kreider said.

    [/rquoter]

    I guess no truth is inconvienient for you basso, because you apparently have no compunction with misrepresenting or outright lying if the truth is not benifical for you.
     
  7. Northside Moss

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seriously, shoot the message not the messenger.

    ...If that makes any sense at all.
     
  8. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,386
    Likes Received:
    9,302
    Maybe I'll be there to shake your hand
    Maybe I'll be there to scar the land
    That they'll be giving away
    When we all live together.
    Talkin' 'bout together now!
     
  9. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    This reinforces that you can't read.

    Gore owned the rights, and has tried to work to get the mining company to go about its business in an enviromentally friendly way.

    This is from the article that basso posted.

    I'm not sure what is so bad about Gore working to make sure that the mine works in an enviromentally friendly way. It is in line with this stance on the environment and pollution.




    The bottom line is this... Gore doesn't own the mine, nor is he in charge of their operations or what violations they create. Gore has worked to try and get the company to work in an enviromentally friendly way, and as of it there is no evidence that the mine has done any serious damage to the environment.

    This is a huge stretch if someone is trying to make this incident be the one that shows Gore is a hypocrite.
     
    #9 FranchiseBlade, Mar 19, 2007
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  10. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,917
    Likes Received:
    39,919
    Let me qualify what I'm about to say by telling you I'm more to the right than left, though recent events have made my contributions to the Republican party to cease.

    I've never understood why people insist that changing your position is being hypocritical. Not that this article implies this is what happened, but if Gore had been doing all these things to damage the environment and then changed his mind after studying the effects...SO WHAT? Isn't that called progress as a human being? Aren't we supposed to learn and grow as people and thus our opinions should change?

    Hypocrisy isn't changing your mind when new facts enter in. Hypocrisy is saying one thing while you clearly don't believe it and act in a contrary manner. I don't give a penny about Al Gore personally, but his change over the past few years into a greenie is hardly hypocritical. All people, even politicians, should be allowed to change their stance as facts become available to them.
     
  11. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,815
    Likes Received:
    5,222
    I find it hard to believe Gore is trapped by an Earth destroying machine that HE CANNOT stop!...What is this a B rated movie...Wait a minute, the inconvenient hyprocit could win an award for this joke of his life!!!!!!!!!

    ...O, he has not changed, as some have stated. He still has 8 bathrooms in one of his homes...Lives as big as possible, Still consumes massive disposals of water and electricity...

    He is NOT genuine...But keep propping him up. There are other Democrats that are genuine or so seemingly that I'd rather you push aside to prop this cracker jack...
     
    #11 ROXRAN, Mar 19, 2007
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  12. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    So uh where does this Swift Boat tour end?
     
  13. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    seriously

    The man isn't even running and people are trying to slander him.
     
  14. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    the ironic thing is that this tactic only wokrs to turn off independent voters who get sick of seeing the same tactics employed over and over again. the right and left will believe what their party tells them. you're either preaching to the choir or to people who will never be converted. the ones who can be converted or swayed have seen this tactic so often, we're frankly getting sick of it.

    Already i know that if someone deliveers a positive messagre tomorrow or starts compaiging for something like campaign finance reform, they will use the same tactic on him.
     

Share This Page