1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Spurs: Making a Run?

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Rocket River, Jul 24, 2001.

Tags:
  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,168
    Likes Received:
    32,867
    I was thinking about if they sign and trade DA
    for Smith

    C- Robinson
    PF - Duncan
    SF - ???
    SG - Smith
    PG - Terry Porter? Daniels

    To me that is not that bad a line up
    esp considering the Zone rules.
    If they could get a decent Sf
    this could be the team trying to make
    one or two last runs on old legs.

    Rocket River
    I didn't wannt get caught up in that other thread

    ------------------
     
  2. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1

    If they brought back AJ and Elliott, then indeed their heads would be positioned where you think they are.

    AJ has lost his quickness. Other old point guards can hang around because they can still get their shot off. With AD, Porter, and their pick Parker, AJ was definitely gone.

    Elliott? I'd be surprised to see him
    return. His knees really gave him problems
    in the WCF.

    The only true "loss" to speak of is DA, yet
    it is quite clear the Spurs did not want him
    back...otherwise they could've simply given
    him that 6th year fully guaranteed.



    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
     
  3. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    Nah, just AD, Porter, and Parker.

    DA didn't exactly do much creating on his own off the dribble. Most of his offense was jumpers and slashing, as well as some breaks. But breaking a player off? Nah, he's not that good.

    ...and they can certainly find a legit
    backup 5 for the min, like a Corie Blount.

    Like who? The luxury tax is clearly not a
    concern...WTF do you think they are going to
    do, spend $13 mil on minimum contract
    players?



    Oh yeah, $13 mil is going to those players...:rolleyes


    [quopte]
    running TP or AD @ the one is a BIG MISTAKE IMO. TP will break down if you want 25 minutes over 82 games. AD is a 2 guard in a pg's body.[/quote]

    AD is 6'4"/205....Cuttino Mobley is 6'4"/190.

    LOL...hilarious. Bullard is a poor man's Ferry then. BFD.

    I guess that's where their perimeter comes into play, no?

    Also, I guess I missed the part about the Spurs being excluded from signing free agents to minimum contracts.

    Fine, you don't like the Spurs, I don't expect you to, but at least post a decent take already.

    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net

    [This message has been edited by MrSpur (edited July 24, 2001).]
     
  4. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    Damn Mr Spur, are you in a clouded daze believing that the Spurs management can do no wrong? If not, then tell me the last time you thought that they made a poor management decision?

    They didn't want Derek Anderson, WTF???? So if DA took their offer, what then, would they be like "oh crap, I can't believe he took our offer, sorry we were just ****** with ya. We don't want you."

    At least here man, people are less cloudy, not totally objective, but still less cloudy. People will criticize the Rocks management if they disagree. Porter did not play 48 at the point, so they did lose depth with AJ, unless Parker can step it up, which is a big "if".

    They also still lack depth in the front. Walker was okay and he's gone. Rose is a hustler, but not enough.

    And of course Anderson's loss is HUGE, unless they can get another scorer and slasher. They're inability to find that 3rd scorer in the playoffs killed them (that and losing their manhood while getting stomped by shaq and kobe). So don't say this "they didn't want DA" crap here man. They are going down the tube unless they some key aquasitions this summer.

    ------------------
     
  5. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'll say what I want because it is the truth. Do you think really they wanted him back?

    I just pointed out that they apparently did not want DA back. They pursued Christie, then McKie before him. Who knows why? Perhaps they aren't enthused by his health. More likely, it's his attitude.

    Sure, the team has made mistakes this summer...caving in to DRob's demands for $9.5 mil this season because ownership was leerly of agitating the fan base as they try to sell out the new arena and extract seat fees from longtime season ticket holders.

    They'll be fine.


    [This message has been edited by MrSpur (edited July 24, 2001).]
     
  6. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mr. Spur:
    You went to gt DA to try to get over LA. What changed that?
    Granted you still have the towers but other than that you don't have much.
    DA was a great fit with the Spurs last year. He was playing at a near all-star level.
    For the majority of the year (up until mid-february) the Spurs were the best in the NBA.
    But I guess you were happy to get swept by LA with DA out for a couple games and then playing very hurt when he did come back. Guess if you advance far enough in next years playoffs you can get swept again.
    I have nothing against SA, but I think the loss of DA is a step backwards. You had a good enough team (when DA was healthy) to compete with LA. Now you don't.
     
  7. Shandon Anversen

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mr. Spur,

    obviously we are watching 2 different temas. how bout a little bet on the season? i think they'll be worse (much worse, actually). i think they are a 2nd rate organization (which is why i can't support them). i think they have every reason to be an elite team, yet don't have the intelligence, character, integrity, an thus, reputation to do it. in fact, i think they'll FIND a way to continue to cut off their nose to spite their faces (we didn't want DA [​IMG] ).

    so how bout this? if the spurs have a better record this year than last, you win.

    if they have a worse record than last season, i win.

    AT STAKE: #1 reputation & #2 two tickets to the rockets v. spurs next year.

    it'll take a year to find the winner, but i'm a man of my word. i'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are. if not, it's all documented here, and we'll all know if you reneged and you'll have egg on your face.

    what do you say?
     
  8. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    Oh, I am so in on that. Put your money where your mouth is Mr. Spur. Sorry for butting in Shandon, can I be in on this too? Mr. "the Spurs had a good off season", Mr. "i am blinded by spurs shades",... [​IMG] Come on! Just make the bet...it's all in good fun. Or how about making it a playoffs thing...like I predict they will far worse in the playoffs than they did last year.

    ------------------
     
  9. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,823
    Likes Received:
    5,365
    I'll get in on a bet, under the condition that the Spurs don't do something moronic and get nothing for Anderson in a sign and trade. You can put me down for the Spurs side, under that condition.

    ------------------
    Draftsource.net-- the premier source for draft info. Profiles, rankings, mock drafts, and more!

    The Mo Taylor Fan Site
     
  10. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm in.


    You must indeed be looking at another team.
    SA paid Elliott's full salary in '99-'00
    even though they contractually were only on
    the hook for half. AJ got a nice one year,
    $8 million "Thank You" contract last year,
    and DRob got his market value contract.
    The organization even helped out Mrs. Willie A
    and her kids after Willie skipped out on her.

    This 2nd rate crap is old and I notice that
    not too many others are spouting it in this
    forum.

    For whatever reason, they did not want DA
    back. If they wanted him back that badly,
    they would've given him the full 6 years/$50
    mil and been done with it.

    Either they decided they wanted him at a
    reduced price and/or were content to see
    what they could find in a sign and trade for
    him.

    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net



    [This message has been edited by MrSpur (edited July 24, 2001).]
     
  11. Shandon Anversen

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lost/Replaced with: Comments


    Avery Johnson/Tony Parker: It’s impossible to gauge Parker, since he’s a rookie. However, Avery’s leadership was well chronicled. Dave & Tim are both silent leaders. DA was a vocal leader, but he is gone, too. Avery knew how to run the Spurs offense better than ANYONE. “The Little General” was a city favorite and will be missed. At this moment, it’s a net loss for the Spurs.

    Derek Anderson/??? (maybe Steve Smith, Bruce Bowen, or NOTHING): DA was everything that Sean Elliot (when healthy) was. He was the third (and arguably most important) leg of the team. He was the premier perimeter player. He was counted on to 1) stretch the defense by hitting the open 3, 2) slash to the bucket 3) create off the drive 4) guard the bigger guards (especially of the Western Conference). He shot 40% from 3 point range and was the second most athletic SG in the Western Conference (next to Sir Kobe). At this point, he may leave for nil. Can Steve Smith provide those things at age 32, with many seasons and questionable knees/back? Doubtful, though his veteran presence would be a plus. Bruce Bowen? A scrub his entire career, it would be unreasonable to expect him to suddenly become a 3 leg and reliable player for the Spurs. If they get NOTHING, they may struggle to reach the playoffs in a very, very, very competitive conference. Either way, it is a net loss for the Spurs.

    Sean Elliott/??? (maybe Stephen Jackson): Underutilized (or at least feeling that way), Sean said on KSAT 12 San Antonio that if he could not receive more playing time and respect from the organization, he would just as soon leave or retire. Likely, he will retire. Losing DA, plus not having Sean leaves the Spurs with very, very little athleticism from the 3 and 2 spots. Steven Jackson has been very inconsistent with New Jersey. He averaged 8 points per game, and could not hold down the starting spot on a very, very poor Nets team. He showed some athleticism, but also showed an extreme tendency to be erratic. His 3 point shooting was poor. IF, IF, IF they Spurs could sucker him into signing (wink, wink), he would be better served taking Sean Elliott’s spot than Derek Anderson’s. Little minutes, just don’t ***** up…


    X-Factor:

    Antonio Daniels is expected to play either the 1 or 2 this year, but has yet to show the consistency and strong “guard mentality” that Pop has desired from him. Still, he had a good playoff showing before the Spurs were swept. His defense against larger guards is a huge question mark.

    Summary:

    The Spurs are a team with many more question marks than exclamation points. The organizations’ handling of AJ, DA, and even David Robinson put one more black mark on a team perceived as “2nd rate” and “soft”. They missed out on Webber & Eddie Robinson – both of which could have helped their game immensely. The reasons may be cloudy, but the fact remains that the Spurs have not been able to attract premier free agents from other teams.

    Coupled with past player catastrophes (Mario Elie, Will Purdue, Dennis Rodman, Dominique Wilkins) the Spurs are now a team on a very thin surface. They have to hope that it’s plexiglas and not ice they are standing on.

    Keeping them afloat is Tim Duncan and David Robinson. Hopes that the new defensive rules with benefit the Spurs is a two-way street – seeing that teams can shadow Tim & Dave now, as well. They’ll need another SUPERB 3 point exhibition – year long, at that – to come close to the level they were at last year. However, when you consider the net losses they’ve had, and the “perceived” organizational problems, the chances are very, very slim.
     
  12. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1

    Wait a second...wasn't it supposed to be DRob who made the Spurs "soft"?

    Man, they handled AJ so bad by giving him a one year, $8 million contract. Ouch.

    As for DRob, the man said he would take
    a "pay cut" to help improve the team, then
    demands his market value. The Spurs offered
    him a two year deal with a player option
    after the first at which time he would likely
    opt out and get his "pay cut" paid back to
    him. He refused and got his wish.

    Derek Anderson started talking about his
    contract demands during the playoffs.
    He wanted 25 shots a game and the MAX. Damn,
    the Spurs are so second rate because they
    didn't think he was worth that.

    They tried with Webber, but ownership forced
    them to drop out.

    As for ERob, he appears to have been a
    casualty of the Spurs' pursuit of Webber
    and Christie/McKie.



    How many teams attract "premier" free agents
    all the time? Anyways, when was the last
    time the Spurs had any semblance of cap
    flexibility? The Spurs have been hamstrung
    in their efforts in free agency before
    because of (in no particular order): no
    cap space, small market, old cap rules that
    favored larger revenue teams, limited team
    revenues thanks to limited suites in Dome and
    Hemisfair, uncertain franchise future in
    SA, uncertain Duncan future in SA, loss of
    players due to injury that limited tradeable
    value (Cummings, Willie Anderson, Elliott,
    Person, etc...), etc...

    You judgement without addressing any of those issues is quite pedestrian.

    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
     
  13. LiLStevie3

    LiLStevie3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2000
    Messages:
    1,160
    Likes Received:
    3
    What about Michael Finley, Desmond Mason, and Larry Hughes? I think those three are more athletic than Derek. I guess it can be debated.



    ------------------
    "I look kind of dumpy. Look at my butt. And what kind of shoes do they have me wearing? At least they got the chinstrap beard right."
    -Kevin Garnett on the KG bobblehead dolls during KG bobblehead doll night at the Target Center
     
  14. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    As for AJ, the word is that he is gone because he "rubbed Duncan the wrong way".

    How many point guards do you think the Spurs
    are supposed to have? AJ clearly has lost a
    step and the Spurs have shown their
    appreciation for his contribution to the
    franchise. If someone is willing to give
    AJ the MCX at this stage in his career,
    good...I'm just glad it's not the Spurs.

    As for DA...he definitely had a blistering 4
    game series versus Minnesota in the
    playoffs, now didn't he? You claim that AD
    is not a point, well then why don't you
    mention him at the 2 then?

    Elliott's career is over if those knee
    troubles continue. The Spurs have certainly
    shown respect to him through his recovery
    from the kidney transplant and were by no
    means at all pushing him to return. They
    even picked up the full tab on the '99-'00
    season when a clause in his contract clearly
    gave the Spurs the option to pay him half
    if he was unable to perform due to his
    illness.

    WTF? The Spurs went with Elie as the
    starting 2 for the entire '99-'00 season
    even though his game was deteriorating
    rapidly. Elie left HTown on bad terms as
    well. Rodman??? LOL Give me a break.

    Perdue was offered more money over a longer
    term by SA and he left for a short deal with
    Chicago, but with the second year non-
    guaranteed. I would bet that Perdue would
    prefer to be back in SA now.

    Dominique? He performed well in SA, but I'm
    not sure he fit in well being a role player
    as opposed to the star...perhaps it was his
    refusal to ever pass the rock that did him in
    with the Spurs. Gee, a team decides not to
    bring an aging veteran back, that must make
    them an awful franchise...

    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
     
  15. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    DA's defense was subpar. Sure, he could put
    up 20 points...and so would the opposing 2
    man.

    The killer with DA is his low FG%. Yes, he
    makes up for that with his high FT%, but
    still, that means fewer touches for Duncan
    and a less efficient offense overall.

    His 3 point shooting % was nice, but overall
    his shot selection was rather poor.

    He has a Kobe attitude, but non-Kobe talent. The problem is, he apparently doesn't realize it.

    ------------------
    It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
     
  16. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    I'm getting tired of this jibba jabba on both sides. Where's Mr. T when you need him? [​IMG] So, Mr. Spur, Cat, Shandon, is the bet official? Is it 58 games over/under or Western Conference Finals over/under or what? What are the terms? Oh, and I'm not buying courtside seats here. I went to Rocks vs. Spurs last year and got the 10 dollar tickets. You can move up, so deal with it. But that's all I'm buying, so it'd be $20 total, and I'm not buying 4 tickets...so I'm only game if we have even sides, or 2 tickets per person..whatever. So is anyone else in. I'm on a roll after this "we don't need a pf/c bet"; ask Shandon about it [​IMG]?

    ------------------
     
  17. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,823
    Likes Received:
    5,365
    I'll buy two cheaper tickets (10-20 each), but that's it. As far as I understand, the bet was over/under the 58 game win total...

    ------------------
    Draftsource.net-- the premier source for draft info. Profiles, rankings, mock drafts, and more!

    The Mo Taylor Fan Site
     
  18. Shandon Anversen

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Terms:

    first, you need to pair yourself against someone. i'm paired off with Mr. Spur. if he sees fit to pair off with other people, so be it. BUT I WANT MY TWO SEATS !! [​IMG]

    second, yes, it is the over/under 58. he's over, i'm under. (hey, that doesn't sound right [​IMG] )

    third, let's try to make the seats in the $15-20 each. if you want to move up or down, it's on you. and if both of you can agree on a set price range, that's your business. mr. spur, i'd be open to two tickets in the $15-40 a piece range. where do you stand?

    fourth, this is based on the regular season record only. playoffs don't count!


    my suggestion would be verse vs. Mr. Spur & Kim vs. The Cat.


    OK?
     
  19. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,823
    Likes Received:
    5,365
  20. Shandon Anversen

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    i've gotta go to class now guys...

    but to this point i have myself and The Cat being in.

    Mr. Spur and Kim, i know you said you were "in" earlier, but i'd like to get one more confirmation after i laid out the terms in my earlier post. sorry for the redundancy.


    also, Mr. Spur,

    the news you brought about tim & avery is shocking to me. seriously. i'll address tht later on tonight....
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now