If they call in too much . . . Just drop them! - Sprint This is just great. Rocket River Sprint has really gone downhill. http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4954998.html Sprint defends decision to drop complainers By DAVID TWIDDY Associated Press TOOLS Email Get section feed Print Subscribe NOW Comments Recommend (1) KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Sprint Nextel Corp. isn't apologizing for its decision to ax customers it determined were calling customer service too often. The nation's third-largest wireless provider sent letters to about 1,000 subscribers June 29, saying the company's records showed they had made frequent calls for help with questions about billing and other account information. "While we have worked to resolve your issues and questions to the best of our ability, the number of inquiries you have made to us during this time had led us to determine that we are unable to meet your current wireless needs," the letters said. The customers were told their service agreements were being terminated, they wouldn't owe anything on their final bill, and the company would waive early termination fees. They also were told to switch to another wireless provider by July 30 if they want to keep their phone number. In debate on the Internet, Sprint's move has attracted criticism that the company is penalizing consumers for trying to get what they paid for, or that the frequent calls are more a reflection of poor customer service by Sprint itself. But Sprint officials said Monday this isn't a case of someone being flagged by a computer program, and that an internal review lasting six months to a year focused on the types of problems the callers had and what information they were seeking. "These accounts have been researched very carefully," Sprint spokeswoman Roni Singleton said. "We feel strongly that the decisions we made, we stand by them. These decisions weren't made lightly." Singleton said the targeted subscribers each made an average of 40 to 50 calls a month to customer service. She wouldn't say how that compared with the overall number of calls logged by the customer service department in a given month. Singleton said the review also found that the subscribers often were calling about the same problems over and over after Sprint officials felt they had resolved the issue. She said some callers were repeatedly asking for information from other customers' accounts, which customer service workers aren't allowed to divulge. "If the average person is calling less than once per month and these people are calling 40 or 50 times more, that takes away from customer service," Singleton said. "Our priority is to improve the customer experience." Officials at competitors AT&T Wireless and Verizon Wireless said that while they may terminate customers who are abusive toward customer service operators or violate other terms of their service agreements, they don't terminate customers because of customer service calls. "We have never severed ties with customers in a mass mailing like this," said Verizon spokeswoman Cheryl Bini Armbrecht. CIBC World Markets analyst Tim Horan said in a research note to investors that he didn't see anything alarming with Sprint's decision. "Sprint has taken a number of steps to improve the 'quality' of its customer base and we view this measure in the same light," Horan wrote. Sprint, which has about 54 million subscribers, has been trying to upgrade its customer base, tightening credit requirements and attempting to attract customers who will spend more each month on data services, such as Internet browsing, music downloads and streaming video. During the most recent quarter, the company said it gained just 600,000 new customers, while AT&T and Verizon gained 1.2 million and 1.7 million, respectively. Earlier this month, Sprint unveiled a new marketing campaign aimed at highlighting its network speed and capabilities, an attempt to distance itself from earlier marketing campaigns that were criticized as unfocused and confusing.
Sorry, but I have no problem with them doing this at all. Can't blame 'em. When you cannot meets the needs of a customer after repeatedly trying, it's time to cut them loose and let them out of their contract so they can find another provider that fits them better. Please understand I'm not defending the quality of Sprint's customer service, just their decision in this instance. OTOH, the issue of cutting of those who roam too much is a completely different story.
Shouldn't the people that complained a lot be HAPPY that they are out of their plan? So they are saying if you b**** enough, you can get out of the terrible 2 year contract you signed. Hmmmm.
Who calls their wireless customer service 50 times a month?!? That's ridiculous. I can't honestly blame Sprint for wanting to get rid of customers like that. Having worked in a call center, I can tell you that 99.99% of the calls we received were for answers to questions that customers could have easily obtained by reading their bill or looking at their online account profile. If people were a little more proactive in researching answers before calling that 800 number, maybe hold times for customer services reps would be a few minutes, instead of hours. Imagine if you owned a dry cleaners, and you had a customer who came in one or two times a day, every day, just to tell you your business sucked or what kind of detergent you used. Wouldn't you recommend they go to another dry cleaner? In fact, after a year or so, wouldn't you tell them to leave and not come back?
Notice that the article said: The following quote is from a conversation about this article on a mailing list I am on. The guy who wrote it is a longtime friend who is a tech manager for Sprint: Its not like that. Sprint is the worst carrier when it comes to customer service and billing. These are people who just want their bills fixed, or a myriad of other problems resolved. We have the most inept customer service department in history. [snip] Hey! I got an idea! How about improving customer service and billing, instead of kicking customers to the curb! Straight from the horse's mouth.
I call customer service at Sprint about once every three months... 40 to 50 calls in a month? thats outrageous whats the problem? you sign a contract, you get this many minutes, with nights and weekends... you get belligerent and make demands and that gets you nowhere... however the story of this Houston based pianist got him a night in jail...pretty humorous to say the least... http://gothamist.com/2006/01/22/belligerent_pia.php
I used to have sprint and they do suck. Its good news for sprint customers wanting out of their contracts. I feel for their customer service employees now that this is out in the public.