1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Sprint Refuses To Reveal Location Of Cell Phone In Carjacked SUV

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Rockets34Legend, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. Rockets34Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    23,415
    Likes Received:
    21,395
    http://www.nbc4.tv/news/6001336/detail.html

    POSTED: 9:14 am PST January 11, 2006
    UPDATED: 9:46 am PST January 11, 2006

    EASTVALE, Calif. -- A stolen car that had a kidnapped baby and a cell phone inside has become the center of a new controversy.

    The parents of the kidnapped baby are outraged that the phone that could have been used to find the baby was not.

    NBC4 reported that a lot of cell phones come with GPS locator technology and privacy assurances that your location will not be divulged to anyone, even to law enforcement without a subpoena.

    "I guess I just assumed they had these GPS things. Let's use it for some good rather than tracking where I'm hanging out at the mall," said mother Stephanie Cochran.

    The Cochran family of Eastvale was loading their baby into their SUV in the home's driveway. The father, Jason, belted in their 10-month-old baby and came back inside for their 3-year-old.

    "Stephanie was finishing brushing his teeth. I went and got him and walked out the door and the car was gone with Wade in it," said father Jason Cochran.

    When the parents called 911 they also realized that the father's Sprint cell phone with GPS locator technology was also in the car.

    NBC4 reported that Sprint wouldn't provide a location to the parents or to the deputies.

    "The deputies were told that Sprint had the location of the vehicle but that they could not disclose it to them because they needed to pay the $25 fee for a subpoena or fill out some forms," said Stephanie.

    Almost 2 ½ hours later a passer-by spotted the SUV abandoned a mile away.

    Responding deputies found the boy safe in his car seat.

    Riverside sheriff's authorities were outraged that Sprint could have directed the deputies to the boy an hour earlier and did not.

    Supervisors were told Sprint already has an emergency protocol that the employee in this situation did not follow.

    NBC reported that the Riverside supervisors were considering prodding Sprint with a regulatory stick but they discovered they don't have authority.
     
  2. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,071
    Likes Received:
    15,251
    I don't see why they wouldn't tell the parents. It's their phone. What's the point of having a GPS system, if the company won't let you use it?
     
  3. Davidoff

    Davidoff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    9
    I think lots of people are at fault here.. the parents, Sprint and the employee..

    What dumb parents leave their kids in the car while they are still in the house?? I dont care if you just run back in really quick, dumb things happen to dumb people..
     
  4. bronxfan

    bronxfan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2000
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    24
    before we hang sprint out to dry, it seems they did have some protocol (i assume for situations like this) but that an operator didn't follow... now maybe they should train their operators better...
     
  5. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Yeah, I'm putting the parents at fault. They're trying to deflect any criticism they rightfully deserve for leaving their 10-month old in the car. Idiots.
     
  6. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,071
    Likes Received:
    15,251
    I don't see them being at fault here. Getting multiple kids in the car is hard. Doing more than one trip is not surprising or dumb. It's a realistic development from the challenges at hand. They don't say in the article, but I wouldn't be surprised if he had started the engine to get the AC or heater (depending on the weather) running for the baby, making the theft especially easy. That doesn't mean he should be victimized though.
     
  7. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    I'm sorry, but leaving a 10-month old in a running car while you go back into the house is dumb. I don't care how hard it is (and how hard is it when you have a three year-old that can walk and apparently brush his own teeth?). I never said they deserve to have their car stolen, but it doesn't change the fact that it's dumb.

    But, what do you expect from people who name their boy Stephanie?
     
  8. TMac640

    TMac640 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    2
    I gots to get better man, it gots to move on
    Switched from Motorola to a PrimeCo phone
    Broke in two chrome, now you know no dope pigeon
     
  9. BenignDMD

    BenignDMD Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    128
    There was a guy in my bio class at UT named Mary...He would go by Mark, but come on now...Mary?!?!?
     
  10. Agent27

    Agent27 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2003
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Stephanie is the mother. She was brushing her sons teeth.
     
  11. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Ah, gotcha. So, there were two adults and they couldn't handle putting both kids in the car without leaving a 10-month old in there alone while it was running? Yeah, they're not at fault at all here.
     
  12. macalu

    macalu Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    16,942
    Likes Received:
    836
    ok, it's dumb to leave a 10 month old in a running car for an extended period of time. but, what if they've strapped their baby in, are getting ready to drive off, then realize they've forgotten something. do you really expect them to shut off the car (which should be done anyways), unstrap the baby, carry the baby inside and pick up what they forget? i guarantee nobody does that.

    i don't know how long they left the kid there but it's a shame this happened and they should'nt be judged so quickly.
     
  13. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Um, I'm never going to leave my 10-month old alone in a running car. Not for 2 seconds, not for 10 seconds, not for any amount of time. If they're too lazy to not leave their kids alone, then I really have no sympathy for them.

    Just like Sprint, who acknowledged the employee did not follow protocol, shouldn't have an entire article dedicated to bashing them for a mistake of one employee?
     
  14. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    so uh exactly what is the point of having the GPS locator thing on, if I have to pay 25 bux to find out where it is?
     
  15. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    I was just about to drill YOU, but you're correct there. I didn't see some " :rolleyes: " but still got what you're saying.

    I am with you that no matter how much time they need, the parents should have made better plans to get the kids out. I have two of my own, and at night when they're asleep in the car, my wife watches the car while I walk the older one and the younger one is in the car.
     
  16. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    If it's not an emergency, I don't see why not. This was an emergency and one Sprint employee made the mistake of not using it.
     
  17. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Bingo. Its easy to say what you would or wouldn't do when you do not have kids. What may seem lazy to some :rolleyes: is just the practicality of the situation. Leaving your kid in the car for a minute while you go to get your sunglasses or usher your other child out the door is completely realistic. It is unfortunate that the situation occured but you cannot go through life standing over your child every second of every day. There is a what if scenario for every situation and its easy to ask why after the fact.
     
  18. macalu

    macalu Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    16,942
    Likes Received:
    836
    maybe we're all blaming the wrong people. obviously, no one is bashing the culprit.
     
  19. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    i'm curious how many of the people ripping the parents have raised multiple kids. Ahh so easy to cast stones from glass houses
     
  20. macalu

    macalu Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    16,942
    Likes Received:
    836
    i agree. i don't have kids but have had enough experience around them to know they are a handful. and if you keep babying them, they'll never let go of that hand. of couse, this is more applicable as they grow older. you just can't be with you child every second of every day.
     

Share This Page