1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Speculative off-season trade proposal involving Rashard Lewis

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Hottoddie, Apr 16, 2006.

  1. Hottoddie

    Hottoddie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2000
    Messages:
    3,075
    Likes Received:
    15
    I was reading an article where Lewis indicates that he could opt' out of the last 2 years of his contract & become a FA. The core of this statement has to do with the possible sale of the team, the continuous rebuilding with youth, & his next contract being his last chance for a big payday.

    If we assume that we'll be able to get a solid PF in this draft, then here's a trade proposal that I'd like to throw out there for discussion.

    Houston sends Howard/future #1 pick to Seattle.
    Houston sends Swift to NY.

    Seattle sends Lewis to Houston.

    NY sends Quentin Richardson to Seattle.
     
  2. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    I'd treat my first round picks like gold in the near future if I were the Rockets, and certainly have it lottery protected.

    Is it me just thinking that the only thing we can get back for JHo is another aging journeyman PF (actually doesn't matter what position) that the other team wants to get rid of also...
     
  3. RocketsMac

    RocketsMac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with u about the first round picks and I think the same way about JHO.. but close your eyes and pick any aging journeyman PF in the NBA and he'll be better than JHO>.. :D
     
  4. hashmander

    hashmander Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    710
    I want them to trade Howard for anyone just so that we can get his "professionalism" off the team because regardless of how he performs that "quality" endears him to coaches like JVG. I'd rather endure Stro's roller coaster than Juwan's consistent suckiness.
     
  5. thephatp

    thephatp Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    52
    I used to be a real proponent for Rashard Lewis, and I think he could really help by being able to hit the long ball (and range of shooting), which could draw defenders away from Yao. HOWEVER, he does not have the defensive prowess, rebounding, or shot-blocking that we so desparately need out of the PF position. I'd rather have a solid rebounder and shot-blocker along with a SG that can hit from outside than another big who can score.

    That said, I wouldn't be too upset if we got him, unless we paid a lot for him.
     
  6. hashmander

    hashmander Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    710
    I don't think he's saying trade for Lewis so that he can play the 4. He's a 3, I'm guessing T-Mac would move back to the 2 in that scenario.
     
  7. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Which is what invalidates the trade scenario. A priority should be improving our quickness on perimeter defense. Shifting McGrady out of position to SG and picking up a lazy defender like Rashard doesn't make sense.
     
  8. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458
    People forget that perimeter defense ins't as crucial when we're straight up outscoring the other team. I'd be fine with the T-Mac-Lewis combo. They'd be more than adequate defensiveley under JVG.
     
  9. docgundy

    docgundy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't do it. Lewis said yesterday that he doesn't think Seattle can afford him. We'd probably offer 3/4 of what Seattle would offer, so why would he take a huge discount to come back here? He still has another 10 years left in the league. He'll be back sometime.
     
  10. tracymac

    tracymac Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    48
    we can definately offer more than seattle...the rockets in general are a more profitable franchise and les is willin to spend...secondly that need to spend will only arise in two years or so when his contract expires...wherever he goes he will still be makin the same money until the end of his current contract...
     
  11. pradaxpimp

    pradaxpimp Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,025
    Likes Received:
    71
    Lewis isn't worth as much as he thinks, although some team out there would be willing to overpay for him.

    Lewis should be worth about 6-8 mil and nothing close to the max.
     
  12. Hottoddie

    Hottoddie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2000
    Messages:
    3,075
    Likes Received:
    15
    Exactly.

    The combination of T-Mac, Yao, & Lewis would give us a very nice 1-2-3 punch. With the continued maturation of Head, all we'd need to focus on in the draft, would be a Ben Wallace type of PF that can score when necessary, but is mainly a shot blocking, rebounding machine.

    I'm not familiar with this year's crop of PF's, but I'm sure we can come up with someone like that in the 6-10 pick range.
     
  13. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,700
    Likes Received:
    3,034
    Shard is a good player but you have to be skeptical as to how he would fit in as a Rocket and whether the whole experiment would be worth it or not.

    Shard is not a PF, too big and slow to guard SG's thus leaving him strictly a SF. The obvious problem with that is that is where T-Mac belongs and needs to play. I am well aware that the NBA is all about matchups and not labels however in this situation, we are stuck with T-Mac guarding the more difficult SG/SF matchup simply because he can and Shard cannot, which isn't ideal.

    If the goal is to add an established scorer to the mix, I would rather go after a guy like Maggette or somebody along those lines that is capable of playing and defending both positions. I cannot emphasize enough how important perimeter defense is. Shard is soft and doesn't like to play defense. Maggette on the other hand has never been known for his defense, but he has all the tools needed to be a solid 1-on-1 and team defender. Ideally, you want T-Mac guarding the weaker SG/SF matchup.
     
  14. CreepyFloyd

    CreepyFloyd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    1
    i fully agree
     
  15. Storm Surge

    Storm Surge Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,574
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really don't think we need Reshard, I mean he will help but we only need complimentary pieces around yao/mcgrady, not a star
     
  16. mateo

    mateo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,968
    Likes Received:
    292
    I think I'm officially burned out on making player decisions based on what town a player is from.
     
  17. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,216
    Likes Received:
    39,715
    Could have had him for free.....

    :)

    How are Mirsad Turcan, or Bryce Drew doing these days anyway?
     
  18. FireBlizzard90

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    2
    I agree with him. Maggette would be a better fit.
     
  19. Gene the PIG

    Gene the PIG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2000
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    6
    DD nailed it.

    Plus, we'd have Richard Jefferson too, but we gave him away ... along with GOD knows what for some paper playa with a gun, no game, & mental illness.
     
  20. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    no way the sonics go for it. why do they need Jho? q takes shards place as the SF, but is a huge down grade. the future first won't be worth much coming from us. and they already have 4 bigs that they want to keep (wilcox, collison, swift, petro). no season for them to make this move.
     

Share This Page