1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Some thoughts on the Rocket's rebuild, their timeline, and the draft

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by elvis, Jun 13, 2024.

  1. elvis

    elvis Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    331
    Historically, there are a few, pretty consistent trends in the NBA:

    1. Even great players don't typically enter their championship window until they turn 25.
    2. Most players (especially role players) start to see a dramatic decline in their effectiveness after they turn 30.
    3. It's very, very rare for a team to win an NBA championship without at least one all NBA player and a supporting all-star or two.
    4. Most of the best NBA trades aren't for all-stars--they are for players like Jrue Holiday who can take a team over the top.
    5. The best chance for any team not named the LA Lakers to get a star player is to draft one.

    Appreciating these trends, gives some perspective on where the Rockets are at and how they should (hopefully) be thinking long-term.

    Point #1

    At the moment, the Rockets best player is Sengun. I have no idea if Sengun will ever be an All NBA player. But he's clearly the player that the Rockets should be building around.

    Sengun will be 22 next season. We are still four seasons away from Sengun entering anything like a championship window. It makes no sense for the Rockets to be trading future assets away right now for players who will be over 30 when Sengun turns 25. Those players likely won't be around (or be useful) by the time Sengun is ready to compete for a championship. Rather than trading our future assets, we should be collecting future assets. If everything goes according to plan, then the time to make significant trades will be going into Sengun's 2027 season. That's when the Rockets will theoretically be ready to compete for a championship again. That's the season the Rockets should be building towards--not 2024 or 2025.

    And when that time comes, the trades the team should be looking at are not the franchise destroying trades for "Stars" that we've seen in the last few years where teams give up every asset they have (making it impossible to keep building or put together a deep roster). The most impactful trades of the last couple of decades were for guys like Andre Iguodala, Jrue Holiday, Derreck White, Rasheed Wallace, Mitchel Wiggins, and Aaron Gordon. These were trades that cost draft picks, but didn't make it impossible for the teams to keep improving at the margins.

    Point #2

    At the moment, it's unclear is any player on Rocket's roster other than Sengun will ever be an All-Star. There's lots of talent no doubt. I love our core six. But no one has broken out the way, say, Anthony Edwards did or the way Donovan Mitchell did.

    It's extremely unlikely that the Rockets could ever trade for a genuine star player in their prime. That could happen, but the cost is now so high for those players that it basically destroys the team's ability to build a roster. That's what happened to Phoenix. It's more or less what happened to LA after trading for Anthony Davis. It's definitely what happened to Brooklyn.

    The upshot is that the Rockets will have to DRAFT the players that lead them to their next championship. This has real implications for this year's draft as well as all of the Rocket's future picks.

    First, until the Rockets have a bona-fide all NBA player on their roster, they have to keep taking shots in the draft. That means they can't (and shouldn't) trade any of the Brooklyn picks. Those picks are lottery tickets. Even if the Rockets aren't guaranteed a win, they have to keep taking shots. It's their best chance of getting a star.

    Second, when drafting, the Rockets can't be looking at role players. Even it's unlikely, the Rockets have to be taking gambles on players who could theoretically be big time players in four or five years (i.e., in time to be part of Sengun's championship window). That means the 24, 25, 26 drafts are crucial because those are the Rockets best chance to grab the players they need to help Sengun.

    Third, because it typically takes NBA players 3-4 years to blossom, we're not drafting based on what a player is right now. The Rockets have to draft what the player could theoretically become in 4 years. That's much harder to do. But it's the right way to think about the draft. If you think that there is a 10% chance that Reed Sheppard becomes Steph 2.0 or a 10% chance that Stephon Castle becomes Kwai Leonard 2.0, and a 0% chance that anyone else could be a star in the draft, then you just have to take a shot.

    Personally, I'm not sure who the Rockets should draft this year. I just know that they should be looking to take someone they believe could be a big time scorer and at least a good defender in four years. For me that means we should be looking at someone like Reed Sheppard or Stephon Castle because they look like they have the best chance of becoming future all stars--even if those chances are just percentage bets. But I'm not a professional basketball scout. I'm just a fan who's hoping that the Rockets stay the course, keep building towards 2027, and make smart choices.
     
    #1 elvis, Jun 13, 2024
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
  2. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,836
    Likes Received:
    39,458
    Elvis has re-entered the building!

    Great post, too. I'm with you... keep rebuilding via the draft till we have a couple of young stars to work with. Don't get impatient and make stupid moves that will keep us on the mediocrity treadmill for another decade. The build-through-the-draft approach makes even more since with a GM who's shown an eye for spotting talent.

    Just put on your flak jacket and get ready for the deluge of posts telling you that our window to win is NOW and that we need to trade for Mitchell, Bridges, Zion, etc. to contend NEXT season.
     
    #2 topfive, Jun 13, 2024
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
  3. theDude

    theDude Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    3,769
    Likes Received:
    5,398
    You are basically saying this team has about a 5 year window that will open in a few years. If you trade for a 27 year old All-NBA player, you are actually extending that window. That player is your centerpiece and Sengun is one of the supporting all-stars or two. Eventually, Sengun or another drafted player (Amen?) becomes All-NBA and the other player is in a support role or has relinquished that spot to another player. This scenario extends your 5 year window into 7-8 years. I don’t disagree with most of what you’re saying, but it’s not the only way. We can’t be too stubborn to make a move for a great player if the opportunity presents itself.
     
    tycoonchip and Corrosion like this.
  4. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,836
    Likes Received:
    39,458
    I agree in theory, but fear the "opportunity presents itself" part will limit us to "great players" with flaws: Mitchell, Zion, etc. It's really rare when a player without obvious baggage of some kind becomes available.
     
  5. theDude

    theDude Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    3,769
    Likes Received:
    5,398
    If you look at the history of trading for great players, the teams aren’t giving up much. Those future picks are usually in the 20s, if they convey at all. And the players given up are generally contract filler. The flaws of the player go into the negotiated price. You might never draft the type of player that you’re waiting for and lose some of the talent currently on your roster because you’re just spinning your wheels.
     
    tycoonchip, jch1911 and topfive like this.
  6. MadMax94$

    MadMax94$ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2022
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    138
    After Westbrook, I never want a star with glaring flaws again. Especially at the cost of young core pieces or future draft picks.
     
    Madmanmetz, cml750, clos4life and 3 others like this.
  7. Furious Jam

    Furious Jam Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    There are only so many spots in the rotation. If you want to give young guys an opportunity to develop and you're reluctant to trade future picks, then at some point you have to draft for fit. That goes double for this particular draft, where no one can definitively say that Sarr or Buzelis or whoever will be a better pro than Sheppard.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  8. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    nice post. thank you thank you very much
     
  9. Rockets34Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    23,265
    Likes Received:
    20,952
    [​IMG]

    Just had to throw it out there since he had zero All NBA or supporting All-Star players..... :)
     
  10. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,746
  11. evo8lover

    evo8lover Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    637
    Likes Received:
    784
    A lot of ya keep saying amen Thompson with potential to be all star while I do agree. I have a feeling cam Whitmore will be too
     
  12. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    3,255
    I generally agree with most of what you've mentioned. I only have a few caveats:

    • I think of lotto picks like all star chances. I think trading 1 or 2 lotto picks and other smaller assets for a realized all star that's in their prime or younger is a good deal. But, I agree, these all in moves where you trade multiple picks and multiple swaps are not the way to go, especially when you have such a young unproven team.
    • There are instances where trading for stars worked. Kevin Love, AD, Kawhi, Paul Gasol, etc. If you win even a single championship, it's a success. But, this only works when the team has at least 1 all nba player after the deal is done.
    • What you described is not actually building around Sengun. Building around him would be prioritizing role players that fit his style of play above all else, even trading young promising prospects if they don't fit. I'm not advocating for that. I think we should be drafting BPA, with a hedge towards superstar upside, like you mentioned. I think the rockets agree or else they wouldn't be so high on Amen.
     
    Easy and xaos like this.
  13. bustamove

    bustamove Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2024
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    929
    I'm excited next seaon for Amens and Cams improvement

    if Bari can significantly improve one aspect (his shooting efficiency) from his rookie to sophomore year,

    I believe Amen and Cam can significantly improve at least one aspect of their games as well

    doesn't necessarily have to be 3 PT% for Amen he can start with his FT% and 15 ft jumper FG%

    and for Cam not necessarily be visionary playmaker but start with awareness, passing, connector passes, hockey assists
     
    evo8lover likes this.
  14. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    18,454
    Likes Received:
    13,308
    Look and tell me how Boston and Dallas built their rosters and that's what I want Stone to do.
     
    Rudyc281 likes this.
  15. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,264
    Likes Received:
    18,473
    Great post. I think Sengun is a future all-star and we should be thinking about him as a key, long-term piece. I think the other likely allstar caliber players on the roster are Amen and Cam. So we’ll see how they develop. But I completely agree that we should continue to take shots in the lotto, and hold tight to those Brooklyn picks.

    on the flip side, we do need to make some tough decisions so guys like Tari, Cam, and Amen can get minutes. These 3 absolutely need to play. I’d be looking move off Brooks. I think he’s served his purpose, and I was never okay with 4-yrs guaranteed at that money.
     
    #15 Aruba77, Jun 13, 2024
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
    Corrosion, Plowman and Easy like this.
  16. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,097
    Likes Received:
    14,826
    Both have potential to be superstars.
     
    evo8lover likes this.
  17. lpbman

    lpbman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    4,237
    Likes Received:
    795
    I'd say it more generously, Brooks was necessary for our jump last season. Tari was hurt and the rookies weren't ready. He was also the dude to say something when DeRozan clobbered Jalen Green. But the young guys need to play for us to take another jump, and the minutes have to come from him. I mean, unless Jalen Green is awful for an extended period or there are injuries.

    I think we ideally trade him at the deadline next season, but if he cashes his paychecks and plays nice with a reduced role that's fine by me. A salary cap doctor could have issues with him staying... I don't know what matching Sengun and Green looks like if they hit RFA, and I think they will.
     
    topfive likes this.
  18. DrNuegebauer

    DrNuegebauer Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2000
    Messages:
    12,606
    Likes Received:
    9,732
  19. evo8lover

    evo8lover Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    637
    Likes Received:
    784
    I do agree he needs to pass a bit more lol kinda remind me of Melo’s ball hogging self lol
     
  20. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    Wrong, Sengun has delayed the progress of his teammates.

    Young players (in America especially) are not use to a PF or Center occupying so
    much space near the paint, and it takes many years to adapt.

    *Jamal Murray / Jokic = Jokic can step aside (to the 3-point line) and let Murray
    operate with less clutter in the paint.

    *Maxey / Embiid = Embiid can step aside (to the 3-point line) and let Maxey
    operate with less clutter in the paint.

    *Anthony Edwards / KAT = KAT can step aside (to the 3-point line) and let Edwards
    operate with less clutter in the paint.

    *Jalen Green / Sengun = Sengun has been no threat from deep from day one and is slow
    and grounded while operating as "Dunker Spot", not a lob threat. I've said it for years
    without wishing injury on anyone; but it didn't surprise me how Jalen Green played
    after Sengun went out last season.

    Post up game by a big is not often run by most high schools or colleges for a reason.
     

Share This Page