1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Sixers get expetion; Anything we can offer?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Sane, Nov 28, 2001.

  1. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would they be interested in Walt Williams? Maybe we can get something from Miami, Walt goes to Philly, and cheap-ass Miami gets the exception?

    What, in particular, do the sixers want?
     
  2. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I did some exploring and here's what I found:


    They're looking for a backup SF, to a less extent they're also looking for a backup PF and/or C.


    Not much 3-pt shooting players on their squad.


    Walt looks like a nice fit. The only problem is that Rodney Rogers is a better fit for the role. But with Gugliotta'snot-so-stellar play, I think the Suns might hold on to Rogers.


    If that's out of the way, and Walt has a really good game against whoever we're playing, I think it's a possibility.


    One more question, would you guys do this?:


    Walt and KT for Corie Blount and the exception, which we then ship to the Suns for Rodney Rogers? or anyone else you have in mind?
     
  3. Severe Rockets Fan

    Severe Rockets Fan Takin it one stage at a time...

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    5,923
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    :eek: I don't know if anyone is willing to trade KT after last night...especially for an unathletic, overweight shooter. Rogers was 6th man a couple of years ago, but after that he's put on 20-30 pounds and doesn't rebound anymore.
     
  4. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, he's been playing well lately. The 6th man of the year was the year before last. We have to think longterm. Next year, we HAVE to trade KT. You CAN'T have 3 PFs that expect minutes. This year, Rogers can play the 4, split with Willis and Griffin. Next year, he can back up the 3 and the 4 when Willis is gone or plays ver y few minutes on a cheap contract backing up Cato.

    in the longterm, this trade would benefit us, cause for this year, we'd have more minutes for Griffin, no problems with KT next year, and Blount helping out at C and PF.


    I know everyones high on him after last night's game, but barring that game, which won't be repeated, i think it's worth what we'd be gettting.
     
  5. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    Insane in the membrane, that's insane got no brain.

    So 10<sup>3</sup> SFs next year, and a crappy Rogers this year?

    Is that you Rudy? Did Kenny question the logic behind big men shooting sissy jumpers and destroying your small guys by running them through the paint all of the time???

    ps, if we're going to sell one of our PFs out... we should do it to Mo. He's injured. May as well add insult to injury.
     
  6. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    i just found more reason to do the second trade.

    Rodney Rogers makes barely 3 million and is on his LAST year, like Walt.

    Next year, T-Mo, Mo-T, Griffin and Rice all get their minutes, and the Rockets are with a capable backup C in Blount.


    This year, Rogers would give us a great season because he's looking for a new contract next year, and I'm sure he's a perfect fit for those days when Rice just isn't hitting.
     
  7. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's safe to say that even if we wanted to trade Mo, we wouldn't be able to.


    Rogers can play PF.

    This is what our line-up would look like:


    Cato/Willis/Blount
    Rogers/Willis/Griffin
    Rice/Rogers/T-MO
    Mobley/Torres
    Francis/Mooch


    I think this is considerably better. We lose a SF, we get a better one, and we also get a C, AND we still have Rogers' contract expiring next year, as well as Blount's (I think).


    Again, We wouldn't be very small, because, Willis and Griffin aren't small PFs. We have Blount to come off the bench if Cato or Willis are injured or aren't playing well. We also avoid ugly contract negotiations with KT next year. Our line-up would become:

    Cato/Collier/Griffin
    Mo-T/Griffin/Draft pick
    Rice/T-Mo/Griffin/Torres
    Mobley/Torres
    Francis/Moochie


    I'm pretty sure we're also gonna be seeing a lot of this:

    Cato
    Griffin
    Mo-T
    Mobley
    Francis


    After a year of getting back into shape, I'm pretty sure Mo-T will start playing SF alongside Griffin.
     
  8. TBar

    TBar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    1
    Unless Rogers attitude has changed, he was not interested in the Rockets when we courted him before. He is a gifted player who gave us a bad time matchup wise. How tall is he?? Does 6' 9" seem right?? With Rogers heighth, think what Kenny could do. I hate to give up Kenny-a hard worker.
     
  9. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    He has no choice really. With Bo Outlaw doing what he used to do, his days are numbered, and I think he'd be glad to join a team where he can get minutes and earn another contract. Simply, he HAS to play hard, if he wants to make big money next season.
     
  10. Hydra

    Hydra Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 1999
    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    1
    Why would the Suns not trade Rogers to Miami, but they would trade him to Houston?
     
  11. gr8-1

    gr8-1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    7,918
    Likes Received:
    4
    If we trade KT this year w/o attaining a serviceable 4, I think we would be throwing in the towel for this year.
     

Share This Page