1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should we trade our pick to the jazz

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by slickricky, May 24, 2005.

  1. slickricky

    slickricky Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    58
    I say trade the #24 to the Jazz for the #27 and #34. That way we have more options. With the #27 we take the best PF left and with the 34 we try and get Maryland point guard John Gilchrist. This will also free up some options on moving mike james. We could package him and Juwan in a sign and trade for SAR
     
  2. macfan

    macfan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's not realistic. Why would Utah give up two picks to move up only 3 spots? If we had a pick above 20, they might do it. Utah will not do this. Come up witha more feasible scenario.
     
  3. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    I wouldn't trade Howard AND James for SAR.

    No thanks.
     
  4. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,851
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    Utah likely to be dealing picks, either for futures or to move up this year.
     
  5. The Ming Dynasty

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    3
    And you want to move James...WHY? :confused:
     
  6. Sooner423

    Sooner423 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    5,675
    Likes Received:
    1,925
    I think I would. I would do just about anything to get rid of Juwan's contract.
     
  7. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,851
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    It's tradable, if he is deemed healthy.
     
  8. Sooner423

    Sooner423 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    5,675
    Likes Received:
    1,925
    I don't know. He's got a player option for the 2008-2009 season for 7.375 million. I'm all for keeping him if he can play like he did in the middle of last season but I doubt he can do it for 4 more years.
     
  9. macfan

    macfan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    1
    What makes you think that he wouldn't? It's not like he relies on athleticism. Juwan is a cerebral player who understands the game. Juwan has been consistently good for almost 10 years in the league.
     
  10. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    Yah, I'd do that in a heartbeat as well. SAR > Howard, and younger.

    James is more replaceable.
     
  11. Sooner423

    Sooner423 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    5,675
    Likes Received:
    1,925
    That's a good point. No one can play forever though. I guess he is only 32. For some reason I thought he was older.
     
  12. Slick Rick

    Slick Rick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is from the "real" Slick Rick. Ha Ha! Just Kidding. I like our chances at 24. We can get Simien or Diogu at 24. Utah will not give us two picks to move up unless there is someone at 24 that they must have. We also have the MLE that can be used on a PG. Howard and James are a good role players. Nobody will want Howard's long contract. Why would Portland want to have another player for a long contract (Zach & Miles)?
     
  13. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Utah has enough picks. I don't think they would be interested in trading 2 of their picks just to move up 3 spots.
     
  14. COMPAQ CENTER

    COMPAQ CENTER Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2000
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    297
    Let us see. Utah has 5 picks this year:

    #6, #27, #34, #51 & #60.

    I doubt they are going to use all of them.

    Maybe #34 & #51 for our #24.
     
  15. bottlerocket

    bottlerocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,539
    Likes Received:
    5
    I can see Utah packaging their picks to move up to try to get Bogut. Bogut has let it be known he wants to play Utah (for whatever reason). Mil or Atl might get a plethora of picks.
     
  16. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41
    Maybe you mean you wouldn't trade SAR for Howard and James....

    I would, it's a no-brainer. Take a potential superstar over an aging guy who had a viral infection in his heart and a B version of Francis who doesn't even try to pass?


    It's like saying "I wouldn't trade two pieces of bubble gum for a $20 bill"....because SAR would be money in the bank!


     
  17. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    That's what I was thinking. Utah will try to use the picks to get the #1 or #2, moving up 3 spots to the #24 wouldn't help them at all.

    Boozer/#6 & #27 pick for #1/Filler would be a good deal for both teams.

    Utah gets Bogut and dumps Boozer.

    Milwaukee gets a banger inside in Boozer, gets the #6 pick and could still get a guy like Green, Deron Williams, or Frye.
     
  18. macfan

    macfan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    1
    What potential superstar are you talking about???
    SAR is not going to get better. He is at his peak or right past it. You've seen the best you have seen out of Rahim just as you have seen the best out of Howard. I wouldn't do that trade. SAR is a miniscule fraction better than Juwan. James is a solid guard, may I say our best guard?
     
  19. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,057
    Likes Received:
    15,230
    24 for 27 and 34 doesn't sound too unreasonable to me. Depends on what Utah wants. And what we want -- will someone useful be there at 24 but be gone by 27?
     
  20. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,851
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    Utah will move picks for futures and/or to move up this year.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now