1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should Rockets make trade for Michael Beasley when he'll be available?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by _RTM_, Jun 6, 2011.

?

Would you like to see Michael Beasley as Rockets SF for the future?

  1. Yes. We should make a trade for him in a heartbeat

    16 vote(s)
    10.1%
  2. Yes, but only for right price

    64 vote(s)
    40.3%
  3. No, this dude is overrated, his defense sucks etc

    65 vote(s)
    40.9%
  4. No, because playing Bud or T-Will would be much better for this team

    14 vote(s)
    8.8%
  1. _RTM_

    _RTM_ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    462
    There were a several reports that T-Wolves would move Beasley if they'll select Williams with their second overall pick in this draft. Those guys are pretty similar, Minny already had Love at four and Randolph, who can play 3-4 and 5 (if coach is crazy), so there is no reason for them to have 4 of those guys a the same time (when two of those four are twins on the court).

    So, if Beasley become available, should Rockets make a trade for him?

    He's versatile on the offensive end of the floor and he creates a lot of missmatches. He's too strong for the most of the NBA small forwards (so he's trying to destroy them in the post) and he's too quick for the most of the NBA power forwards, so he's trying to beat them of the dribble, to stretch the floor by using his sweet stroke and this is quite a reason for opponent's problem in defensive rebounding category, cause he takes rival's big out from the paint if you actually try to defend him by your PF

    He finally grown up, he showed some leadership and he finally started to prove that he'll be All-Star caliber forward.

    <object width="560" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PFSYHonZo_M?version=3&amp;hl=ru_RU"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PFSYHonZo_M?version=3&amp;hl=ru_RU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="349" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

    He's athletic forward with good stroke, nice potential, rookie contract and he's continuing to develop. He had some mental problems but he was able to solve them and right now his only weakness on the floor is Beasley's unabitity to play good perimeter defense because he's not used to play near the arc, but he'll progress in future in this category.

    SF position is pretty questionable for our Rox and if we're going to tank (and we are going to tank) one extra-year of developing is just what this guy needs.

    If you want to see him in Rockets uniform, what price would you agree to pay?

    Don't forget about Kaaaahnnnn, too. It could be a steal.
     
  2. Willis25

    Willis25 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,387
    Likes Received:
    31
    It would be a nice value pickup - but don't we have the same problem....too many PFs?!?!
     
  3. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    I doubt there are too many teams going after him. An expiring contract and a draft pick is about what they can get for Beasley.

    Not a bad guy to take a chance on, but my guess is that if Beasley comes in, T. Williams goes out. The Rockets don't want to exceed the head case cap.
     
  4. amaru

    amaru Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    17,293
    Likes Received:
    10,639
    No......unless Williams is somehow moved at the same time.
     
  5. ashishduh

    ashishduh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    61
    I'm not sure "he had some mental problems but he solved them" is a factual statement.

    But anyway, he's not a 3.
     
  6. LongTimeFan

    LongTimeFan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2001
    Messages:
    7,757
    Likes Received:
    963
    Yes, he is. At least compared to any other position he could play.

    I like Beasley and I think he could be the type of player who takes a while to put it all together, but will be damn good when he does. The problem is having Martin and Beasley destroys any ability to put out a NBA defense.

    I'd probably still try to get him for cheap though. I don't know what his next contract will look like, but it will come under the new CBA so it's unlikely to be a cap killer. If anything, it gives the Rockets another potent scorer to dangle in future trade talks, or lessens the offensive blow should they find a deal they like involving Martin.
     
  7. _RTM_

    _RTM_ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    462
    he's actually a three

    Heat used him as four because Spoelstra said that he wants this guy to be a low post scorer. He said actually, that he would teach him to be a center rather than small forward

    But he's not strong enough on the boards for PF and his low-post defense, controlling the paint, off-ball defensive movement are too weak so he is just a nonrebounding version of Antawn Jamison on four.

    But on SF, he scores, he rebounds, he's able to contest some shots and he's one of the strongest guys at his position in the NBA. He's not quick as hell and he's only starting to use the fast dribble against smaller guys of this level, but if you would give him another year, no doubt that he'll deliver
     
  8. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,314
    Likes Received:
    177,169
    Yeah, get Kevin on the phone with KAAAHHHHN, and play "Let's make a deal". :)
     
  9. _RTM_

    _RTM_ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    462
    And if you are able to get this guy for a right price, off course you should.

    We are rebuilding and potential star player, that already scores 20 points per game are not grown on the trees, especially for what? 6.2 millions? Crap Ariza owns 6.8M for the next season
     
  10. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
  11. KingStevo10

    KingStevo10 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,400
    Likes Received:
    147
    Ya right after Daryl snorts a line of coke :eek:
     
  12. _RTM_

    _RTM_ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    462
  13. _RTM_

    _RTM_ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    462
    Forwards that scored more than Beasley last season

    Durant - baby max
    LeBron - almost a max (salary reduced due a three-heat signing)
    Melo - max
    Dirk - almost a max (reduced his salary for more funds on free agents)
    Granger - almost 65 M
    Rudy Gay - baby max
    --------
    And he'll only get better
     
  14. CDrex

    CDrex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,999
    Likes Received:
    1,498
    I always HATE being asked "should we trade for Player X?" What does that even mean? It's like you ask me "3 - x = ?". Where's the rest of that equation? Would I take Beasley for Brad Miller and a second rounder? F*** yeah...but that's not going to happen. Would I take Beasley and Flynn for Lowry, Hayes, Patterson, and Budinger? Nooooo. The devil is in the details.

    Now, if you ask me "would you take on Beasley's baggage if we got him without giving up a rotation player"? Yes. But with the season he just had, that's not really an option.
     
  15. RealRocFan47

    RealRocFan47 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    367
    I would do it for maybe Chase and Hill or something around those lines depending on the particulars. Wouldn't give up anything too significant though.

    He is a good player and when he plays the 4, he is out of position. but he is a high risk. I wouldn't give the wolves equal value, it would have to be a steal,

    But if he were to play here, at least he already knows the area. Seeing that he completed his drug rehab in Houston
     
  16. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,688
    Likes Received:
    10,160
    I like Beasley and i agree, he is not a 3. If he were to play at the 4, his defense would be a lot better. He is too slow to defend other three.s. This is why his lack of defense sticks out so much.
     
  17. BasketballReasons

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,045
    Likes Received:
    237
    He is super super r****ded though.
     
  18. acsorelle4

    acsorelle4 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    373
    OP had some good reasons. Plus, his ogfseasondrug rehab facility is here! :)
     
  19. UTAllTheWay

    UTAllTheWay Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,859
    Likes Received:
    2,316
    I'd give them Scola... but that's pretty much it.
     
  20. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,688
    Likes Received:
    10,160

Share This Page