Should creationism be a part of public school curriculum?

I think that there is plenty of time on Sunday to teach our kids intelligent design/ creationism. What ever happened to the separation of church and state?

"I'm here to keep outside forces from removing science from science books," said David Hillis, a biology professor at the University of Texas. "The goal (of Discovery) is to insert a religious and political agenda into the science classroom."

While intelligent design, which claims that a higher power directed human development, is more scientific, critics said it couldn't be included because it had not been peer reviewed by reputable scientists. Raymond Bohlin, speaking on behalf of the Discovery Institute, said Darwin's Origin of the Species was not peer reviewed.

Evolution sparking latest textbook firestorm
By Marti Maguire
San Antonio Express-News

AUSTIN — Controversy over textbooks erupted again Wednesday as scientists and members of the public addressed the Board of Education over the treatment of evolution in biology textbooks.
Nearly all of the three dozen speakers defended the teaching of evolution against a report that questioned the accuracy of evidence supporting the scientific theory in the 11 biology texts being considered for adoption in Texas.

After Discovery Institute — a Seattle-based public policy group — submitted the 55-page report, teachers, scientists and activists went on the offensive.

They said they feared that the elected board, dominated by conservative members, would use the report to influence publishers to include references to creationism or "intelligent design" as a scientific theory.

While intelligent design, which claims that a higher power directed human development, is more scientific, critics said it couldn't be included because it had not been peer reviewed by reputable scientists.

Raymond Bohlin, speaking on behalf of the Discovery Institute, said Darwin's Origin of the Species was not peer reviewed.

"Often new scientific ideas are not welcomed in the scientific literature," said Bohlin, who holds a doctorate in biology and is director of communications at Probe Ministries in Richardson.

Texas Freedom Network Director Samantha Smoot called Discovery's analysis "creationism dressed up in a lab coat," and stressed that good science books are needed to prepare students for both the TAKS and careers in medicine and biotechnology.

"I'm here to keep outside forces from removing science from science books," said David Hillis, a biology professor at the University of Texas. "The goal (of Discovery) is to insert a religious and political agenda into the science classroom."

The meeting was reminiscent of last year's four-month battle over the adoption of social studies textbooks.

Trustees Terri Leo, R-Houston, and Don McLeroy, R-Bryan, questioned several speakers at the public hearing, asking whether perceived weaknesses in evolutionary theory should be included in textbooks.

Leo said publishers shouldn't remove evolution or insert religion into books, but should present both the strengths and the weaknesses of Darwin's theory.

"If we censor out scientific weaknesses, we limit the best of our educators by addressing them to avoid debate of different viewpoints and to explore the range of theories in the classroom," Leo said.

The elected board does not alter textbook content, but can reject books because of mistakes or because they don't match the state curriculum.

Another public hearing will be held in September, and a vote on new books for both biology and English as a second language, which will cost an estimated $90 million, will take place in November.

 

There are so many different religions which form or whose idea of creationism will be taught? Is intelligent design really a catch all for all religons, or is it really only the Christian idea of how the world was created?

 

The Discovery institute seems to go out of their way to hide the fact they are a religious organization. There are more articles about the Texas textbook situation along with other issues they support or oppose at their site, which tries to convince the reader it is purely scientific.

Clarifying the Issues in the Texas Textbook Controversy

By: Discovery Staff
Q&A about Discovery Institute and Intelligent Design
July 10, 2003

Media Advisory
July 10, 2003

On July 9 the Texas State Board of Education heard testimony from two Discovery Institute scholars who encouraged the Board to make sure biology textbooks fulfill state standards and teach students about both the strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian theory. Unfortunately, much of the reporting about Discovery’s views has been factually inaccurate.

When reporting about Discovery Institute, we encourage reporters to talk with us first. We will gladly assist you and answer your questions, and we have access to many different sources and experts who can explain complicated science issues in easy to understand language.

For your quick reference, here is information that corrects assorted misstatements that have appeared in recent news accounts.

1. What is Discovery Institute?

Founded in 1990, the Institute is a national, non-profit, non-partisan policy and research organization. It has programs on a variety of issues, including regional development, technology policy, legal reform, and bioethics.

2. What is the Center for Science and Culture?

Discovery’s Center for Science and Culture encourages schools to improve science education by teaching students more fully about the theory of evolution, as well as supporting the work of scholars who challenge various aspects of neo-Darwinian theory and scholars who are working on an alternative theory known as intelligent design. Discovery’s Center for Science and Culture has more than 40 Fellows, including biologists, biochemists, physicists, philosophers and historians of science, and public policy and legal experts, many of whom have affiliations with colleges and universities.

3. Does Discovery Institute favor including the Bible or creationism in biology textbooks?

No. Discovery Institute is not a creationist organization, and it does not favor including either creationism or the Bible in biology textbooks. The Institute is a secular policy and research organization, and its concerns about textbook coverage of evolution have nothing to do with creationism.

4. Is Discovery Institute trying to eliminate, reduce or censor the coverage of evolution in textbooks?

No. Far from reducing the coverage of evolution, Discovery Institute seeks to increase the coverage of evolution in textbooks. It believes that students ought to learn more about evolutionary theory, including the theory’s unresolved issues. The true censors are those who want to keep textbooks from including any discussion of the scientific weaknesses of evolutionary theory.

5. Is Discovery Institute trying to get the Texas Board of Education to put intelligent design in biology textbooks?

No. The Institute’s goal is to inform policymakers and citizens about factual errors in how some textbooks cover evolutionary theory and to encourage textbooks to include information about both the strengths and weaknesses of evolutionary theory. The 41-page preliminary textbook review Discovery Institute distributed to the Board of Education focused on factual errors and the need to include additional information about four issues—the Miller-Urey experiment, the Peppered Moth experiments, the Cambrian Explosion, and Haeckel’s embryos. The only places that the report broached the subject of intelligent design was in reference to two textbooks that already discuss intelligent design theory. The textbook review noted how these two textbooks discussed intelligent design in a biased and highly inaccurate manner. While the Institute is not advocating that textbooks must cover intelligent design theory, it does believe that textbooks that already mention intelligent design should cover the theory accurately and fairly. Again, the Institute’s chief concern is that evolutionary theory be treated fully and accurately in textbooks, NOT that intelligent design be included.

6. Is intelligent design theory the same thing as creationism?

No. Intelligent design theory is an effort to empirically detect whether the “apparent design” in nature acknowledged by virtually all biologists is genuine design (the product of an intelligent cause) or is simply the product of an undirected process such as natural selection acting on random variations. Creationism is focused on defending a literal reading of the Genesis account, usually including the creation of the earth by the Biblical God a few thousand years ago. Unlike creationism, the scientific theory of intelligent design is agnostic regarding the source of design and has no commitment to defending Genesis, the Bible or any other sacred text. The effort to detect design in nature is being adopted by a growing number of biologists, biochemists, physicists, mathematicians, and philosophers of science at colleges and universities around the world. American scholars who adopt a design approach include biochemist Michael Behe of Lehigh University, microbiologist Scott Minnich at the University of Idaho, and mathematician William Dembski at Baylor University.

http://www.discovery.org/