1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Senate Stats

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by rimrocker, Oct 6, 2010.

  1. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,127
    Likes Received:
    10,168
  2. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    I'm not so concerned about the bills, but Obama should just appoint a bunch of the nominees during this recess and move on already.
     
  3. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,127
    Likes Received:
    10,168
    He cut a deal with Repubs to get 54 confirmed in return for not using recess appointments... that still leaves the 110.
     
  4. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Well, tough. If they cannot stop him (gentleman's agreement type thing), he should do it anyway. Only suckers play by rules no one else abides by.
     
  5. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,127
    Likes Received:
    10,168
    The essence of the deal is that the Senate will stay "in session" so there will technically be no recess.
     
  6. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Ah. Well that obviously changes things. Now I would venture to state that was a stupid deal for Obama to make.
     
  7. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    As the minority party though I am curious how Republican Senators can keep the Senate in session.
     
  8. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    The House and Senate are such massive contrasts.

    In the House, the minority party literally sits there and twiddles its thumbs. The Rules Committee basically makes it so that you cant propose amendments or bring up bills to the floor. In the House a bill can be voted on and the speaker can literally take his or her time to certify it in order to get members of the house to change their vote.

    In fact during the medicare drug bill, the vote initially failed so Republicans kept up lawmakers until 4 AM to convince them through sleep deprivation and constant pestering (along with some concessions in terms of pork) to switch their vote. Meanwhile the democrats just had to sit there and watch as it happened without any recourse.

    Meanwhile in the Senate the minority party has the ability to essentially put anything on hold with a filabuster unless the majority has a solid supermajority.
     
  9. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,127
    Likes Received:
    10,168
    The deal was with Reid. So, I guess he could break the deal... but he won't.
     
  10. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,127
    Likes Received:
    10,168
    Now, it's only 109 confirmations waiting on Republicans...

    The Good Lloyd misses the point. A name change wouldn't make a difference since Repubs have decided to do everything possible to break the Senate, delay appointments, and cripple the Obama administration.
     
  11. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,394
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    unlike the democrats until 2006?
     
  12. MoonDogg

    MoonDogg Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    5,167
    Likes Received:
    495
  13. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    I wouldn't place all of the blame on the Republicans. I don't know the numbers, but I do know a story. Close to home, respected Democrat Jefferson County Criminal Court Judge John Stevens was nominated by President Obama for US Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas. He's a Democrat who has overwhelming support on both sides of the aisle. Both Texas Senators, as well as Congressmen Chet Edwards and Ted Poe supported his nomination. He would have been a slam dunk for confirmation. The Democratic Senate refused to put his confirmation on the docket until more controversial nominations were voted on. After several of the Democrats stonewalling on a great nominee because the Republicans were filibustering questionable nominees, Judge Stevens withdrew his name from consideration, and from what I heard was disgusted by the whole process. By playing politics, Democrats ensured that a well-qualified nominee, and one of their own, would not serve the Federal government.
     
  14. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Just noticed that my story was mentioned briefly in the article you posted, if I could read.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now