http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/ae/jump/1916102 Looks like the GnR has-beens reunion tour is gonna be a little postponed.
"Officers pulled Weiland over early Sunday morning for driving without his lights on, said Burbank Police Sgt. Tracy Sanchez. They reported noticing that Weiland had narcotics in the car and arrested him. Authorities didn't say what kind of drug Weiland allegedly had." "They reported noticing that Weiland had narcotics in the car..." When are people gonna learn the lessons of Eddie Griffin? Don't take your stash in the car! If ya do, hide that sh*t! Damn!
What do they say about "has-beens?" Oh yes, better to be a "has been" then a talentless "never will."
Actually, when using the term "has-been," you are referring to present tense of said subject. So the present tense of "never was" is "never will."
Rumor has it Axl told Scott "Hey man, we're outta beer. Scott, take my car and get another case of beer."
the guy deserves to get arrested after that "days of the week" single from the last stp album. did you hear that crap? pitiful
If it were Axl, he probably gave Weiland an extra $50 for a couple of buckets of KFC, 10 whoppers, 3 extra large pizzas (extra cheese), and a big old bagful of Taco Bell.
Exactly the reason why the GNR guys should NOT have hired this guy to front their new band Reloaded. He just is not reliable. They should have tried to work it out with the former singer of Buckcherry (Josh Todd?). He has such stage charisma and a pretty decent voice. He would have fit in perfectly. Weiland has a decent voice as well but his unpredictability just does not make for a healthy band.
Yahoo! says it was for cocaine and heroine. Looks like I nailed his new band name on the head in the other thread: "Reloaded with Heroine"
Damn, this guy gives me insight into what it's like to be a father sometimes. You want him to succeed and put out good music, but he keeps getting busted for drugs and letting you down.
Actually, you are defining a person in the present by way of their past, as in "he was (has been) a star but is not one anymore." Thus, for the "no-stardom" person, it is "never was," as in "he never was a star and still isn't today." You are assigning a future state with "never will" so the "success" counterpart would be "will be."
