1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Scola/Landry one of the best PF rotation in the NBA?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by devin23, Mar 22, 2008.

  1. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    Only PF rotation in a team that's probably better would be Detriot's Mcdyess/Maxiell. We really solved our PF problem and should be good at that position for a long time if we can keep them both.
     
  2. SpiffyRifi

    SpiffyRifi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    22
    While I love Scola and Landry and theink they are the best power forwards we've had in a while...I think its hard to say they are the second best power forward combo in the leauge. The Celtics has Garnett and Big Baby Davis, the Jazz have Boozer and Milsap, the Spurs have Duncan and Horry, and the Lakers have Odom and Turiaf. Those are just the ones I can think off the top of my head. While Scola and Landry may be better than the second player in those rotations, their starters dominate Scola or Landry. Our guys are hustle players and have a lot of upside, but its far to early to be crowning them as the best power forward roation in the NBA.
     
  3. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    I'd take ours over Detroit's. McDyess is on the downside. Speaking of McDyess. I've been thinking about who you could compare Landry to. Anybody remember McDyess pre-injury? Tremendous explosion. But I still think Landry is quicker. Right now, I can't think of a quicker PF than Landry.

    Boozer and Millsap is a good combination.

    And if I played for the Celtics or Spurs, me and Garnett or me and Duncan would be a great combo.


    And interesting would be a comprehensive look at the highest scoring frontcourts (C and PFs) in the league. We'd have to be right up there with Yao, Scola, and Landry.
     
  4. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    Well when both our Rookie PFs were in the top 10 in rookies back when Landry was healthy, i'd say i believe we have a pretty damn good PF rotation. :D
     
  5. SpiffyRifi

    SpiffyRifi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    22
    How about Amare Stoudamire?
     
  6. Sherlock

    Sherlock Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Before Landry went down, for 10 games there, we had better production at the PF position than anyone in the whole league.
     
  7. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,135
    Likes Received:
    15,071
    I love Scola and Landry. It's a good rotation. In them, we have hustle, heart, and the offense we have not had in the past few years. I do think, though, that we can't say they're the best because they don't have enough size. We desperately need size on this team. That's what we're missing with Yao. Guys like Garnett, Amare, Shaq, Dwight Howard, and even David West are going to push us around in the post, thus canceling our power forwards out of the game.
     
  8. BoomShakalaka

    BoomShakalaka Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont think he's quicker than Landry, but more height and gets higher
     
  9. BoomShakalaka

    BoomShakalaka Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did you see the games with the Celtics and Hornets. Garnett and West did not go off. Landry went crazy against the Hornets earlier this season. Howard, Shaq are centers not PFs. Know your positions.
     
  10. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    I believe Landry's quicker. When you consider the amount of time between catching the ball, going up and finishing, I think Landry is quicker. Amare is quick, no doubt about it. And he's 6'10". He would probably be as quick as Landry if he were a little bit shorter. What adds to Landry's quickness is most of the time, He goes straight up and flushes, using the rim for protection on the topside as well as the bottomside. He basically snakes the ball right over the rim which makes it virtually impossible to block unless someone is willing to get their hand broken dangling it right above the rim. Landry gets up high enough to pull the hammer back and we've seen him do it sometimes when there is space. But he shines in traffic. by getting up so quick and mopping the rim with it as he puts it down with force.

    Amare on the other hand, most of the time, simply jumps higher and can throw it down over everybody on the floor. However, this takes longer, and is less efficient than Landry's finishes. If Amare wanted to, he could increase his efficiency and quickness by dunking the way Landry does, a straight up and down. Amare is not as quick.
     
  11. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    Yeah forgot about Boozer/Milsap. That probably is the BEST PF combo in the league right now. Once gasol and Bynum comes back, if Odom plays backup PF, that one will be the best. But duncan/horry is very 1 sided. Horry is only there for clutch shooting nowadays. He sucks at everything else now. Garnett/Davis is good too.
     
  12. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,694
    Likes Received:
    38,954
    Duncan and a bag of beans?

    DD
     
  13. BoomShakalaka

    BoomShakalaka Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    0
    Chuck Hayes has done a pretty good defensive job on him this season. Lets not forget about Hayes now, he can be useful at times.
     
  14. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    I think the way you should look at it is our power forwards are gonna cancel them out. Think about it. When you have two guys that combined can give you 26 points and 12-14 boards, you cancel out Garnett, Duncan, and Amare's production. And then you've still got Yao giving you 20/10. Shaq and Dwight should not even be in the discussion. First of all, Shaq is on the extreme downside. I'll take Yao over Shaq any day and you will too. And with Scola and Landry canceling out Amare's production, we will be on the plus side at the 4/5 spots against them or Boston/San Antonio for the same reasons.

    Think about it. With a healthy Yao, we've got an average production of a little over 50 ppg and 20-24 boards per game from our center and PFs. That's crazy man. In any game, half the points and rebounds coming from 3 guys playing the power positions.

    Think about it this way. Who else in the league can match our production at the power spots (Center and Power Forward) when Yao and they are healthy?
     
  15. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,184
    Likes Received:
    9,008
    Probably the best work at the PF position since the Championship years and before. This has been a glaring problem for many years. Sort of like the PG position. And, yes, despite his magical run during the streak, I still contend that Rafer is not the answer. The larger body of evidence supports both observations. Why the Rockets have struggled so long in addressing obvious weaknesses is hard to fathom.
     
  16. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    We have a good PF combo, but we really need a C/PF backup that can slide to either position at a moments notice, in case Landry's knee acts up again, or Yao's yearly injury hits again. Chuck Hayes is a good defensive presence, but our offensive options takes a big nosedive when he's in there.

    Someone in the mold of Lamarcus Aldridge or McDyess. Unfortunately, those guys are entrenched in their team's rotation.
     
  17. poprocks

    poprocks Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Landry needs more minutes. The way he plays he could be hitting 20-10. Really unloads T-Mac and prevents doubling defenses. They gotta focus on Landry. Landry keeps it up, defenses are gonna start doublnig him. I agree that having Scola and Landry on the floor at the same time poses a very tough problem for opposing defenses.
     
  18. ColomboLQ

    ColomboLQ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Rockets tried hard to address the PG situation in the offseason. They added Mike James, Steve Francis, and drafted Aaron Brooks. The problem was that none of those moves has worked as of yet. But they did try to fix it.
     
  19. Rockets1616

    Rockets1616 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    10
    Yeah, but the post is the post. You need tall people in the post because whether they are PF or C, they are gonna be fighting for the rebound. Thats why Perkins on the Celtics killed us on the boards because we didn't have anybody his size that could box him out.
     
  20. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,398
    Likes Received:
    3,260
    especially if that bag of beans is only playin around 10 min or less

    I don't think the devin23 thought this one through, but both of those are putting up pretty good numbers.

    I do think we have great versatility at PF, we have athleticism, we have great defense, we have great post offense, unfortunately their in 3 different people as opposed to 1 like a KG or Duncan. And none them are tall.
     

Share This Page