1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Saudi prince donates $10 million to Trade Center fund, rejected by Giuliani

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by MrSpur, Oct 11, 2001.

  1. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1
    http://www.nj.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?j0180_BC_NY--Attacks-SaudiPrin&


    NEW YORK (AP) -- A $10 million check from a Saudi prince for the World Trade Center relief effort was rejected by city officials after he followed the Thursday gift by criticizing U.S. policies in the Middle East.

    Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, in a statement released after he visited ground zero, said the U.S. government "should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause."

    The comment drew a sharp rebuke from Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, followed by an announcement that the check was rejected.

    "We are not going to accept the check -- period," said Sunny Mindel, the mayor's communications director.

    Giuliani, at a City Hall news conference after the prince's statement, said such remarks "were part of the problem" behind the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.

    "There is no moral equivalent for this attack," the mayor said. "The people who did it lost any right to ask for justification when they slaughtered 5,000, 6,000 innocent people. ... Not only are those statements wrong, they're part of the problem."

    The prince, an outspoken member of the Saudi royal family, is a major investor in American companies. After his tour of ground zero, the prince initially called the attack "a tremendous crime."

    "It's just unbelievable," he said. "We are here to tell America and to tell New York that Saudi Arabia is with the United States wholeheartedly."

    But in a statement distributed by an aide, the prince said that "at times like this one we must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack."

    "I believe the government of the United States of America should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause," Alwaleed said. "Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek."

    Alwaleed is chairman of Kingdom Holding Co. and was sixth on Forbes magazine's list of the world's richest men for 2001.

    The prince did not criticize U.S. policies in his speech, saying instead, "I came here to show my allegiance to New York."

    Alwaleed said prime terrorism suspect Osama bin Laden, a Saudi, does not represent the Wahabi sect of Islam, which is practiced only in Saudi Arabia.

    "This guy does not belong to Wahabis," he said. "He does not belong to Islam or any religion in the whole world."
     
  2. gradysu

    gradysu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good for Rudy. This guy is another of the "yes-but" crowd, who sort of condemn the attack, but really think we were asking for it. Meanwhile, the Saudi regime has been propping up and protecting OBL for years.

    These people also conveniently forget that OBL has never, until now, expressed anything that indicated he gave a rat's ass about a Palestinian homeland. But now our Middle East policy is the retroactive rationale for everything.
     
  3. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    According to CNN's Amonpour(sp?), obl only RECENTLY jumped on the Palestinian bandwagon.
     
  4. gradysu

    gradysu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah - when he heard people like Prince B'Ozo using our foreign policy as an excuse for terrorism.
     
  5. MrSpur

    MrSpur Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    1

    I saw that report too. I've also seen reports that Saudi Arabia has tried to "play both sides" when it came to terrorists v. relations with the West.

    Saudi Arabia did revoke Bin Laden's citizenship, but apparently al Qaeda has no problem getting support from inside Saudi Arabia.
     
  6. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Guiliani's making a mistake. He's making the US appear as hard-line and radical as the people we're opposing.

    It's not like the prince conditioned the aid, and said "use this only if you change policy." He gave money for a humanitarian purpose. He didn't happen to agree with all of US policy. Who the hell cares? Most of EUROPE doesn't for crying out loud.

    Do we really demand complete agreement with ALL of our foreign policy? If someone doesn't agree, are they automatically one of the bad guys? For a nation that's supposedly pluralistic, we seem awfully intolerant of different perspectives.

    Some US policy in the past has been indefensible. Should everyone pretend otherwise, simply to soothe feelings?
     
  7. HOOP-T

    HOOP-T Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2000
    Messages:
    6,053
    Likes Received:
    5
    This is not going to go over well. Giuliani should reconsider this decision.
     
  8. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,072
    Likes Received:
    3,601
    :) :) :) Haven, why don't you just move to Kabul if you don't like it here.




    I know. I promised. I just couldn't help it.:) :) :)
     
  9. Timing

    Timing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    This prince pulled a bush league punk ass move and Rudy is just calling him on it. The Saudi royalty can agree, disagree, and whatever else they want to from the safety of their little palaces in Saudi. He could have made those comments at any time before today and if he truly wanted to help he could have sent a check any time before today. He obviously orchestrated it and used his position and invitation to get a jab in. It was weak and classless. Good call Rudy G.
     
  10. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Yeah, real good call. :rolleyes: On the day he said that the damage could cost close to $100 billion, he rejects a check by someone who's saying what many Americans are. He didn't say we deserved what happened, he just said that maybe we should look at all the reasons. We may disagree with him, but why in the hell should Rudy reject this money?? Good thing he's not running for a third term because turning this down would probably hurt him.
     
  11. Dream34

    Dream34 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    554
    Likes Received:
    7
    Haven,
    You said it perfectly!!! Like numerous other responses you have replied on. I just wanted you to know you have numerous people who agree with your posts.

    :cool:

    ;)
     
  12. RocksMillenium

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    Messages:
    10,018
    Likes Received:
    508
    Hey, if the prince has a right to give the money, the mayor has a right to turn it down! It's not like he's badmouthing him, he just didn't take his money. He didn't say re-evaluate U.S. policies for a good cause he said re-evaluate policies for OUR cause, look at what he said:

    <i>Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, in a statement released after he visited ground zero, said the U.S. government <b>"should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause." </b>
    </i>

    Sounds to me that next time the U.S. did something they didn't like they could say "Look we gave them money", and then another group of people are upset because THEY think the U.S. is being bought off! I say great move not accepting the money. Thank you but NO thank you!
     
  13. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    Rudy G did exactly the right thing, and for exactly the right reason. I am very impressed with this man.

    The Arab propagandists have tried interjecting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into every single policy issue concerning the ME in an order to turn opinion against the Israelis - and the US - for years, and they have been very successful. The purpose is to stir up hatred for the US and Israel (and the West in general), and through deception it has worked very well.

    Never once mentioned is the simple fact that the Israelis have already offered the Palestinians everything they asked for, and the Palestinians rejected it. Never once is it mentioned that every single cease-fire since 1993 has been broken by the Palestinians, not the Israelis. Only the Palestinian deaths are reported, and terrorists are pertrayed as "freedom fighters". If they were "freedom fighters" then they'd be free now, because they would have accepted Barak's offer (which was everything they claim to have wanted).

    Their real goal is to destroy Israel, and they are pissed at us for not letting them do it. Statements like that of the prince just inflame their hatred for us, and this is a clear attempt by the Saudi Royal Family to appear to its people as chastising the US for its evil deeds in supporting Israel. They are, after all, a despotic regime that is in serious danger of falling should their people rebel - and they are close to rebelling.

    Good for you, Rudy. Say no to the Palestinian propaganda machine. Good for you.
     
  14. boy

    boy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    two words

    zionist lobby
     
  15. Mango

    Mango Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    10,172
    Likes Received:
    5,625
    Define what was meant by <i>recently</i> in calendar terms.


    Mango
     
  16. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    I guess since Rudy G. represents New York, he has the legal right to turn it down...I'm not so sure it's a good thing though. It all depends on how much money is needed to help the victims. I suppose if the Prince really really really cared then he would just annonymously donate it to some relief organization that helps people and doesn't give a damn about politics.

    Simpson's quote:
    Moe to Cashious Clay-
    "I don't need your stinkin money."
    (Moe folds the check and neatly puts it in his shirt pocket.)
     
  17. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,813
    Likes Received:
    5,218
    3 words: Good for Rudy! :)
     
  18. ROCKET RICH NYC

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    13
    Come to New York City and visit Ground Zero and you will UNDERSTAND why Giuliani said what he said. I agree with him! We don't need charity from a person/country that believes we deserved this to happen.

    I'm attending my second Memorial service this week! With another one to come next week!
     
  19. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    from today's Daily News...

    <I>Giuliani Nixes Saudi's 10M Gift

    By LISA L. COLANGELO and CORKY SIEMASZKO
    Daily News Staff Writers

    Mayor Giuliani told a Saudi prince to take his $10 million donation and stuff it yesterday after the world's sixth-richest man suggested the World Trade Center was attacked because the U.S. allowed Palestinians to be "slaughtered" by Israelis.

    Giuliani also blasted Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal for daring to criticize American foreign policy on the one month anniversary of the attacks.

    "I entirely reject that statement," Giuliani said. "There is no moral equivalent for this act, there is no justification for it. The people who did it lost any right to ask for justification for it when they slaughtered 5,000, 6,000 innocent people."

    Giuliani said the Saudi's remarks "only invites this happening in the future" and are "part of the problem."

    The mayor, who had given the prince a tour of Ground Zero yesterday morning and was unaware of the statements until reporters asked him about it, wasted no time in ordering the Twin Towers Fund to nix the donation.

    "We are not accepting the check, period," mayoral spokesman Sunny Mindel said.

    Alwaleed flew back to Saudi Arabia after the memorial, and his spokesman, Amjed Shakir, said he could not comment.

    There was no official reaction from the White House or State Department. But government sources said Giuliani's move caused some anxiety because President Bush is trying to keep Arab allies united in the drive to capture Osama Bin Laden and topple the Taliban.

    A State Department source said officials were upset about the prince's remarks but that Giuliani did not consult federal authorities in his decision to reject the check.

    The diplomatic dustup came as the death toll from the Sept. 11 attacks climbed by four, to 442, and the number of missing dropped from 4,807 to 4,776 as officials accounted for more foreign nationals who were believed to be dead.

    One of the hundreds of princes who make up the Saudi royal family, Alwaleed is chairman of Kingdom Holding Co. The prince owns 25% of Euro Disney near Paris, plus smaller stakes in Planet Hollywood, Saks Fifth Avenue, Norwegian Cruise Lines and Apple Computers. He also is the second-largest individual shareholder in Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., which owns the New York Post.

    As he toured Ground Zero before the memorial service, Alwaleed called the attack "a tremendous crime." He also had harsh words for renegade Saudi and terror mastermind Bin Laden, saying "he does not belong to Islam or any religion in the whole world."

    "I came here to show my allegiance to New York," the prince said at the memorial. "We are here to tell America and to tell New York that Saudi Arabia is with the United States wholeheartedly."

    Inflammatory Statement

    But minutes later, an Alwaleed aide handed out a statement in which the prince said, "At times like this one we must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack.

    "I believe the government of the United States of America should reexamine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause," Alwaleed said. "Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek."

    Giuliani has not shied away from speaking out on international issues. A strong supporter of Israel, he gave the Clinton administration agita when he barred Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from Lincoln Center during the United Nations' 50th anniversary celebration in 1995.

    More recently, he infuriated the UN when he threatened to tow the cars of scofflaw diplomats.


    Original Publication Date: 10/12/01</I>

    http://www.nydailynews.com/2001-10-12/News_and_Views/City_Beat/a-128263.asp
     
  20. HOOP-T

    HOOP-T Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2000
    Messages:
    6,053
    Likes Received:
    5
    First off, show me where I said I didn't understand the reasoning behind what Giuliani did. Also, find and show me how or why you think that the Prince said or believes we deserved this to happen. I can show you quotes where he condemned the acts as terrible and unjust though. Here you are:

    As he toured Ground Zero before the memorial service, Alwaleed called the attack "a tremendous crime." He also had harsh words for renegade Saudi and terror mastermind Bin Laden, saying "he does not belong to Islam or any religion in the whole world."

    "I came here to show my allegiance to New York," the prince said at the memorial. "We are here to tell America and to tell New York that Saudi Arabia is with the United States wholeheartedly."




    But do I think it was a good move on Giuliani's part? No. That's all I said. This may even cause more backlash against the US. Things are too sensitive right now to rock the boat over a comment made about our foreign policy.
     

Share This Page