1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Rodney Rodgers a NJ Net

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by 3814, Aug 15, 2002.

Tags:
  1. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    That is a very solid signing for them, RR is one of the most consistent offensive spark plus off the bench there is in the league. He is a great fit for them, providing the scoring when RJ and Kittles's offensive games are slumpingf. With Mutumbo and RR, I think without question you have the strongest team in the east next year (I qualify this with the fact I thought Phily was that team last year before they starting trading their defensive players and rebounders). They still have a weakness at the 2 guard, sorry Kittles and Harris don't cut it, but they are looking strong--especially for the East.
     
  2. 3814

    3814 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,433
    Likes Received:
    72
    yeah, they definately have a VERY solid team now. the nets have hugely improved the already top team in the east. the west might have to watch out.
     
  3. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,912
    Likes Received:
    13,045
    Kittles is decent for the "2," and Rogers can play backup 3/4, maybe leaving some minutes for Jefferson at the 2 (he'll be their starting 3).

    Chad Ford thinks next year's Finals should be Kings-Nets. Barring injuries, missed Kings' free throws and Laker-loving refs, I'd have to agree.
     
  4. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I personally think Kittles totally sucks in cruch time and other times is at best adequate. He is an awefully weak 2 guard for a team that wants to compete for all the marbles. While to me clearly the best team in the East is the Nets, they do not at all stack up to the Lakers or Kings in talent. Though I kinda like how they might match up with the Kings if they can play slow plodding BB (can control tempo--who better than JK to do this, and play physical--Martin and Dike are good places to start). I like their match-up against LA much less because LA can play slow, physical, defense oriented ball and still mostly do the things they want to do on the court. The best chance for the East is the Kings knocking off the Lakers in an up and down affair and the Nets bruising by the Kings. Stranger things have happened.
     
  5. LiLStevie3

    LiLStevie3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2000
    Messages:
    1,160
    Likes Received:
    3
    Here's an interesting quote from a Nets source:

    "We didn't trade for Mutombo and chase Rogers with the idea that they're the silver bullet that can topple the Lakers. We're crossing our fingers that the Kings do it for us. They were dangerously close last year. I think it's just a matter of time. I don't want to get ahead of ourselves, but I think we've put together a team that would give the Kings a real scare. It would be a great series to watch."

    http://dynamic.espn.go.com/espn/chat/chatESPN?event_id=2216

    So they're counting on the Kings beat the Lakers for them and for the Kings to hopefully be vulnerable enough to be beaten.

    IMO, no East team will win the championship for a while; that conference is just to damn weak. The Nets would probably be around a 5th or 6th seed in the West.
     
  6. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,309
    Likes Received:
    14,748
    Rodney Rogers can play both at the 4 and the 3,and could prove to be a valuable player for the Nets but he can be inconsistant because of his conditioning problems.
     

Share This Page