1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Rockets, at this stage, better or worse than last year?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Sane, Aug 8, 2003.

?

Griffin and Pike...or Posey?

  1. Give me Griffin (600K) and Pike (2.5M) for less money per season combined

    274 vote(s)
    82.3%
  2. Posey at 4.9M is a better option

    59 vote(s)
    17.7%
  1. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just wanted to know if you think by adding Piatowski and Grififn, are we improved over last season's team which included Posey? You'd also have to consider the cap implications, and the fact that we're in a better position cap-wise than we would be if we re-signed Posey.

    Contracts:

    Posey is 4 years and 22.6M. he will make 4.9M in his first season, and doesn't make 6M or more except in his final year.

    Pike is 3 years and 8.5M I believe.

    Griffin is 2 years and 1.5M.
     
  2. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Heck, I would have chosen Pike and Griffin over Posey even if the salaries matched. Don't get me wrong... I thought Posey made a nice contribution last year, but getting two veteran players that you know will contribute in areas the Rockets needed (perimeter shooting, ball movement, and defense) is huge. Takes the pressure off Nachbar, and I think Rice will make a big contribution this year as starter.

    If you look at successful teams, all have solid role players like Piatkowski and Griffin coming off the bench. And both of these players will contribute more under JVG's new system. HOU *will* make the playoffs this year... and getting solid role players will improve the odds of making some noise in the playoffs.
     
  3. brando

    brando Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    1
    If you are comparing this time last year with this time this year you would have to ask if we are better with Pike and Griffen minus Kenny Thomas TMo and mabey Hawkins. I say we were better this time last year with KT.
     
  4. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    we are not done adding yet.

    we ave only spent half of our MLE (pike), and half of our $1ME (griff).

    we could stilll add another two players.
     
  5. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    If that's your opinion, as long as you realize there was no way the Rockets were going to be able to retain Kenny Thomas after this season anyways.

    I think we're better this time last year simply because Yao has a year of experience under his belt and he'll be a starter on opening night.
     
  6. ragingFire

    ragingFire Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO, Posey rates an 8 out of 10 on defense + 5 on offense = 13.
    AG 7 on def + 5 on off = 12.
    Pike 5 on def + 7 on off = 12.

    U can rate them 1, 2 point either way but they are still close.
    I am happy with AG and Pike.
     
  7. ragingFire

    ragingFire Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    KT costs an arm and a leg. That's not just money, it means u don't have the money to acquire or retain other talents.

    KT has no place on this team with EG and MoT. He is worth close to 0 even if he is a good player.

    We can still get TMo and Hawk but they r not any better than AG on def and worse than Pike on offense.
     
  8. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,819
    Likes Received:
    12,583
    Do you what position he played in Philly and in Houston most of the time. He played the 3. KT is a better 3 than Posey will ever be, and he was our best 4 last year. No we probably would not have been able to afford KT, but looks like we can't afford Posey either. At least we would have been in the playoffs though.
     
  9. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    The 02-03 Rockets had two players with playoff experience - Cuttino and Glen Rice. With the addition of Pike and AG, they now have 4 players in the rotation with playoff experience. And they still have a little $ left for a Mark Jackson or Charles Oakley-type vet.

    I voted this year as better.
     
  10. kmbwa

    kmbwa Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    This year.

    Yao's education last year was tremendous. He knew he needed to get stonger and appears to have done so evidenced by the recent pics. Guys were able to lean on him last year. If he's put 10-15lbs on the upper body, it could get ugly.
    He knows what to expect from the NBA and should be able to pace himself.

    He'll have another year to teach the rest of the team how to play real basketball.

    Along with the money reasons, the Pike + AG over Posey adds another player to the rotation. We needed fewer DNP-CD and more players to contribute.

    This team still needs a headhunter and Oak sounds like a good fit.
     
  11. TheHorns

    TheHorns Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Posey is a more complete player, but not for what he signed for.

    They have made smart move with regard to the mentioned signings, but that is a result of having an owner who will not pay the luxury tax, but I am reluctant to say they are "better."

    In order for this team to be "better" people like Steve & Cat are going to need to improve and make changes in their game, and Ming will have to be more of a force and become an effective first or second option.

    This team is not a contender for anything but making the playoffs, does ANYONE truly believe that we are a threat to win even one series in the playoffs with a team that really is no better than last year?
     
  12. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    I am sitting on the midcourt lines wondering whether losing James Posey will hurt us more or adding Pike and A. Griffin will help us more.

    However, to be blunt, your statement, "we could stilll add another two players." isn't quite correct. We could add a bunch of league minumum players, but would that help the team? Maybe, maybe no. One good player is better than a bunch of scrubs. The question is whether JVG can pluck diamonds out of the sand or whether Jerry West gets away with a jewel heist.
     
  13. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    I can tell you for sure that Jerry West ain't getting away with no jewel heist. At the very best, Posey will perform up to the leve of his contract. There's no way he's going to be considered a steal or a bargain.
     
  14. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    There is no doubt in my mind that Posey > Pike and A. Griffin.

    But I still believe that as far as this team goes we are a better team with 2 experienced vets. than another overpaid guy that really hasn't proved that he is worth the money.

    All in all I think the Rockets have made good decisions so far and the off-season ain't over yet.

    Oh by the way does anybody remember another JVG coached team that seamed to get filled up with a bunch of SG/SF tweeners. hmmm... oh well at least none of ours cost 125 million.
     
  15. HeyDude

    HeyDude Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    43
    I think the poll is a little misguiding. It shouldnt be Posey vs. Piat and AG. One of our main weaknesses this offseason was shoring up our shooting. We did that perfectly w/ the addition of Piat. Piat did not prevent us resigning Pose, it just filled a different weakness. Its the AG signing that makes me think the Rockets are saying bye bye to Pose.

    I think the poll should be taken a couple of weeks for now, when the Rockets add a veteran pg and another player w/ the money they have left over. U see, the Rockets thinking is this: We have only this much to spend, and thats it. Should we spend it all on Pike and resign Pose, or go the other route and fill other roster spots w/ players who might be able to contribute very cheap. Then u can compare: Are we better, lets say, w/ Piat, AG, Best or Jackson, and another player w/ the left over money, or would we have been better off just signing Piat and resigning Pose.

    Now these are the things to think about: are the other positions really that important to fill that we weaken our SF position?? Thats the question to think about. So basically its not Pose vs. Piat and AG. Its more like Pose vs. AG, pg, another veteran player. Piat would have been signed regardless.:cool:
     
  16. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Improvement isn't going to come from adding or losing bit players like Posey, Piatkowski, and Griffin, so I believe the question is irrelevant. It is up to Ming and Francis to improve the team. As they get better the team will get better. The Rockets were going to improve by default next year, no matter who was added.
     
  17. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    On the surface, your statement is correct. But from a more practical standpoint, who the Rox sign as role players can significantly determine the success or failure of their season.

    For example...if Steve Francis severely twisted an ankle and was out for 6 weeks, wouldn't the Rockets be better off having signed Mark Jackson as a backup? That one signing could have as much impact on the end result as how much Yao narrowed the gap between Shaq and himself.

    I think your view is too narrow. But then I'm probably on your ignore list so I doubt you'll see this. :) :D
     
    #17 GATER, Aug 8, 2003
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2003
  18. SLA

    SLA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with Smoothie and Gater and whoever concurred with them...

    If you are saying.....which is better? Posey or Griffin and Piatkowski? Then I would say the LATTER. It's better to be deeper and we saved some money too.

    BUT...we have also lost Terence Morris...so I guess we're even from last year.

    We do have a new coach though...and everyone is expected to improve.

    And we do have more players with playoff experience.
     
  19. ragingFire

    ragingFire Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes I do. He played the 4.
    The short experience at the 3 did not work.
    If u think KT can play SF, then u know nothing about BB.

    (note: A lot of people can play out of position but that does not mean it's the best thing to do!)
     
  20. SLA

    SLA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    By the way.....

    SF 36/MN 12
    CM 36/EP 12
    AG 25/EP 15/BN 8
    EG 28/MT 20
    YM 36/KC 12

    We really don't need Glen Rice! I'm satisfied with our team right now......but if we could make a big trade that improves our power forward position....then woohoo! It seems kinda likely.
     

Share This Page