<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Es8dtZW4FnA?version=3&hl=ru_RU"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Es8dtZW4FnA?version=3&hl=ru_RU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Not to criticize Rubio, but rather the choice of plays, I was expecting a more exciting highlight reel. Why is his #1 play a wide-open three for the tie?
3 point buzzer beaters against the Mavs and Clippers for a lottery team that is finally starting to win is so lame. Especially from a rookie sensation who has a reputation for not being able to shoot.
Rubio's shot was a tying three, which wasn't even at the buzzer. 20 seconds later, Love hit the winning three.
The Clipper shot in the video not a buzzer beater, not even a 24-second clock one. It tied the game. Watch the video. Love won the game on a buzzer beating, 29-foot, 3ptr with no time left on the clock. So, they chose the second best shot of the Clipper's game (vs Love's) to be Rubio's #1 highlight. I don't get it.
