1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Resolving the Mo Taylor and KT issue - Swinging a trade

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by juice, Aug 1, 2002.

  1. juice

    juice Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Warning: Long thread.

    What to do with Cato and KT seems to be a fairly popular issue, so I thought it might be interesting to review the options facing the Rocks in order to resolve this issue:

    Cato and KT:
    1. Sit tight and hold both
    2. Trade Cato individually
    3. Trade KT individually
    4. Trade Cato and KT as a package

    Of course you could further break this down as to whether to trade Cato and or KT, now in the preseason or later once the season is underway and before the trade deadline. Since this is the offseason - and fans need something, anything to talk about - and both Cato and KT have just capped off good years, right now would probably be the best time to swing a trade.

    Because of who he is, Cato is probably more attractive to Eastern conference teams who don't get a chance to watch as many of his games, and who are also desperate for big men, much less Western Conference-hardened big men. With his big contract however, Cato is difficult to trade, so realistically the only way he'll likely be traded is in a package with somebody of value.

    This is where KT comes in. Houston fans know about KT. The numbers: 14 and 7. The work ethic and potential and desire to still improve. And most important of all, the relatively small contract which incidentally is soon up for extension. KT's contract is not commensurate with his talent and ability and that is what makes him attractive to teams in the league's present "Ain't-got-no-Money-`less-Your-Name-is-Duncan-or-Kidd? climate.

    The answer? Trade Cato and KT together. To find what the Rocks need in return, we also have to look at what we're giving up in the context of the situation:
    1. Cato: A serviceable starting center on a Western Conference Team. Only other centers on that team being a rookie: Yao Ming and Jason Collier

    2. KT: A still-developing though nevertheless starting PF on a Western Conference Team. Other PFs on that team being a five-year veteran with little post or rebounding skills, a big contract, and who is coming off a serious injury having not played any ball for a full NBA season: Mo Taylor; and a sophomore who has already been anointed as the franchise PF of the future: Eddie Griffin

    So what do the Rocks need:
    1. A center: Ideally a veteran capable of starting in the West and who can groom, encourage and challenge Ming, but who will also be willing to step aside when the student surpasses the master

    2. A shooting guard: Ideally a player who can backup Mobley for 10-15mpg - to keep Cat fresh in anticipation of a postseason - someone to come off the bench and play decent minutes without too great a deterioration in the level of play. Ideally a big guard (6'6+) and defensively-oriented.

    The proposed deal:
    HOUSTON trades:
    Kelvin Cato
    Kenny Thomas
    Glen Rice
    Terence Morris

    MILWAUKEE trades:
    Ervin Johnson
    Tim Thomas
    Anthony Mason
    Jamal Sampson
    Ronald Murray

    Why Milwaukee do this trade:
    1. Cato - a proven WC center who provides a big presence in the low post ? something the Bucks are desperate for and the reason why they signed Mason last season

    2. KT - a genuine long-term prospect at the 4, who will benefit from the smaller bodies in the east

    3. They want to shed some salaries and though it's been Big Dog's name that has been mentioned in trade rumours, they would be willing to part with Tim Thomas who has yet to consistently fulfill the promise for which he was given a large, long-term contract

    4. They replace Tim Thomas with Rice and Morris. Rice gives the Bucks a short-term backup for Big Dog, whilst Morris offers a longer-term proposition at the 3 spot. Rice fits perfectly into the up-tempo jump-shooting offense of the team, whilst also offering a post-up game, decent D and veteran leadership. Morris gives the Bucks a replacement at SF once the contracts of Rice and Big Dog expire.

    5. Bucks get immediately better - without giving up any of the big 3 and after just missing out on the 00-01 finals (which they would have been a chance to win), their planning is strictly short-term only

    6. Lineup:
    Milwaukee Bucks
    C Cato, Przybilla, Gadzuric
    PF KT, Haislip, Caffey
    SF Robinson, Rice, Morris
    SG Allen, Redd
    PG Cassell


    Why Houston do this trade:
    1. Johnson - with Ming as a rookie, gives the Rockets what they need as an 'interim' 5 until Ming full develops. Gives leadership, rebounding, defence and a work ethic and willingness to do the dirty work which hopefully will positively influence the rest of the team. Will be willing to go to the bench once Ming is ready to start.

    2. Thomas - gives the Rockets a big SF (6'10) who can shoot the ball all the way out past the arc (an absolute requirement for all Rudy's big men). Can score, rebound, block shots and is used to and willing to come off the bench if necessary. Often given the big jobs on D. Good locker room presence. Had an poor season last year due to injuries.

    3. Mason - legitimate, veteran low-post banger who also plays D. Gives the Rockets what they've lacked for a long time - an enforcer and intimidator. Should also help protect Griffin and Ming in the paint. Was the only player on the Bucks last season who bothered to play D. Absolute ironman of the league, last year at 36 years of age, averaged 38.3 minutes. Production did drop off though after the move from Miami, probably more a product of getting acclimatised than deterioration of ability.

    4. Sampson - cousin of Ralph Sampson (ignoring the basketball issues for the moment, imagine the marketing possibilities of having Ming, plus the cousin of a former great - Twin Towers Mark II?). Raw but very gifted athletically, long-term prospect as a backup for Ming. (http://www.nbadraft.net/profiles/jamalsampson.htm, http://www.nba.com/draft2002/profiles/jamal_sampson.html)

    5. Murray - NCAA Division II Player of the Year. Relatively small 2-guard at 6?4 but seems capable of also pinch-hitting at the 1. The ONLY rookie named to the Boston Shaw's Pro Summer League First Team. Averaged 18.2 points in the tournament, second only to Richard Jefferson of NJ. (http://www.nba.com/draft2002/profiles/ronald_murray.html)


    6. Rockets get rid of 2 big salaries in Rice and Cato.

    7. Rockets get rid of Cato who most likely would not handle being sent to the end of the bench very well. Potentially and indeed in the past has been a bad locker room presence.

    8. Rockets resolve the PF situation and deal KT to a team that needs a player of his talent

    9. Lineup:
    Houston Rockets
    C Johnson, Yao Ming, Sampson
    PF Mason, Griffin, Taylor
    SF Thomas, Nachbar
    SG Mobley, Murray
    PG Francis, Norris


    Personally this is what I'd like to see the Rockets do. Yeah, I know it's a crazy pipedream but treat this trade as a conversation piece.

    Comments, thoughts, other trade ideas.
     
  2. DearRock

    DearRock Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am really sorry you started a new thread on this. Can I suggest that you start one addressing the ways the rockets can improve their defense next year which has gotten very little play on this board, recently.

    Regarding your suggested trade, I will not trade KT and Cato together or individually. You really hurt you discussion when you introduced Johnson. On the bucks team Terrence Morris as a four year veteran would be able to average 11 points which is what Tim Thomas did. Outside of scoring, Morris' rookie numbers matches that of Thomas'. Learn to appreciate the talent you have.
     
  3. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Tim Thomas was a very young player with loads of potential coming into the league, and still has some room to grow. Terrence Morris, on the other hand, was a four-year college veteran who reached his ceiling his sophmore year. I'd take Thomas over Morris in a heartbeat. But, I wouldn't even think about doing that full trade as was proposed abve.
     
  4. mateo

    mateo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,967
    Likes Received:
    291
    This STILL leaves us with a logjam at PF.

    I think Cato is not the problem...we dont need to unload a center, we need to figure out what to do with the PFs.
     
  5. juice

    juice Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought I did address the issue of defence. After the Rockets, the Bucks are the team that I follow most closely. I don't know if or how many Bucks' games you watched last season, but invariably the top defensive jobs were given to Tim Thomas and Anthony Mason.

    Though Thomas came off the bench he was almost always assigned the job against the opposition's top perimeter threat. He covered everyone from MJ to KG to Paul Pierce. Though he may not have always shut them down, he still did an adequate job and at least tried.

    Similarly Mason always received the opposition's top low-post scorer. And always, always played D for the whole game. That and like I mentioned previously he offers an enforcer and intimidator, plus a veteran presence in the paint. Perhaps even someone to tutor Griffin and Ming.

    Finally, yes Johnson may not be the finest or most talented basketball player in the world but he is an example of how hard work is just as important as talent. Some might derisively call him an "overachiever" because of this fact.

    And on the Thomas-Morris comparision. To my eye, Thomas though he has been in the league for six years and not four, is only 25, Morris is 23. For the past three seasons, Thomas averaged pretty much the same minute, and in the season in which he got more minutes (00-01) his numbers went up pretty much across the board. That and Thomas is a better shooter than Morris, whether from the field, the line or behind the arc.

    I do appreciate the talent that the Rocks have, but additionally sometimes all that talent simply cannot coexist.
     
  6. mr_gootan

    mr_gootan Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2001
    Messages:
    1,616
    Likes Received:
    121
    Let's not worry about trading now. It's a long way till the trading deadline. By then, questions about chemistry, rotation, talent, injuries, and playoff potential will be answered.

    (Personally, I want a veteran guard who can teach Francis about skills that are needed for the playoffs. But Hubert Davis and Raja Bell sound good, too.)
     
  7. pasox2

    pasox2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2001
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    47
    This is ok, but flawed. Many players. The crux of the deal is Ervin Johnson - Kelvin Cato and Tim Thomas - Glen Rice/KT. Either piece might work by itself. Mason makes things muddy. The benefit you offer is Tim Thomas. I assume you have Thomas starting with SF, CM, EG and YM. This leaves bench EJ, MT, BN, OT, MN. This does improve the defense, leaving more than adequate firepower. Ervin Johnson is an adequate backup, but Yao needs to be able to handle a starter's role.

    We can't take contracts on both Thomas and Mason. The contracts are too big and too long. We need some of that room to resign our own players and stay under the tax. Rice's contract expires in the right time frame to keep Steve, Griff and Yao together as our nucleus. Mobley is a good contract. Nachbar is a good contract.

    Leave Mason out and the deal is more interesting.
     
  8. DearRock

    DearRock Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Juice the coexistence thing has to be tried first. So probably next year at this time we can review that.

    The defensive needs are not at the 4 and 5 spots; especially with the addition of Ming. I have concerns at the 3 but I would take the versatility of our 4 SFs (Rice,Nachbar, Thomas and Morris) and the insurance against injury instead of Tim Thomas. In the backcourt, which I do not think you addressed, I would want to bring in Brown some more, say ten minutes, who may be our quickest guard. That could allow more of Francis at the 2 which added to Torres should make us acceptable defensively. Alot will depend on the coaches; however, given the depth at most positions I am hoping that the pace of our game on both sides of the ball is increased say by 30%. Probably our best defense would be to have a tired defense having to play us in the fourth quarter.

    The breakdown of average fgs made versus those made by opponents for the top 3 western teams and houston are as follows:


    Dallas--37.6/35.8
    Sac-----38.2/37.6
    LaL-----37.9/36.4
    Hous---35.9/36.8

    If we seek to bring the offense up to at least 37.5 coupled with a slight reduction in defense to 36.0 we would be fine.


    Houston
     
  9. leehoang

    leehoang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kinda of a crazy trade. but i'd still like to unload collier and langhi

    but i wouldn't mind having mason and t thomas on my team.
     
  10. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    How on earth does this solve the MoT KT issue, you have MoT playing 3rd string. The whole point of this issue is to let go of a PF, not trade one for another.
     
  11. juice

    juice Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    DearRock - I would like to see an increase in the Rockets pace of game but I don't think this is possible with the players we have at the 3 spot. Rice probably wouldn't be able to keep up with the run and gun type of play and Nachbar simply wouldn't be worth what'd we'd be giving up on the defensive end.

    It is difficult to address the guard situation, as quite simply there aren't that many defensively minded swingmen on the market. The premier perimeter defensive specialists that come most immediately to mind are Bruce Bowen and Ruben Patterson. From what I have heard, Ronald Murray is a very good player and has impressed the Bucks. He had a very good summer league and dropped 28 points twice, both times carrying the Bucks over the line. Murray is listed as the most likely player to get a roster spot, as the number one back up for Cassell.

    I was rethinking the trade and here's another option:

    Houston trades:
    Kelvin Cato
    Kenny Thomas
    Terence Morris

    Milwaukee trades:
    Tim Thomas
    Ervin Johnson
    Greg Anthony (re-signed)
    Jamal Sampson
    Ronald Murray

    A third team might have to be involved to even out the salaries, depending on the size of the contract Anthony receives.

    Houston
    C Johnson, Yao Ming, Sampson
    PF Griffin, Taylor
    SF Tim Thomas, Nachbar
    SG Mobley, Murray
    PG Francis, Anthony, Norris

    I like this trade more, as it really give the Rockets the ability to give Yao Ming and Griffin more minutes, without complaints from Cato or KT. Plus it improves the 3 spot immeasurably, and allows the Rockets to possibly begin playing Francis at the 2 - probably where he belongs - without having to worry too much about the PG situation.

    I think most people will agree a trade has to be done and personally I think dealing Milwaukee would be the best option.
     
  12. Dennis2112

    Dennis2112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    3


    NEWS FLASH!!!!!

    Langhi is no longer with the team...

    He was cut loose...let go...services no longer needed
     

Share This Page