http://cbs2chicago.com/local/r.kelly.verdict.2.746826.html R. Kelly Found Not Guilty In Sex Trial CHICAGO (CBS) ― R. Kelly has been found not guilty of child p*rnography on accusations that he appeared on a videotape having sex with a girl as young as 13. The jury read the verdict shortly after 2 p.m. They found the R&B superstar not guilty of all 14 counts. Kelly dabbed at his face with a handkerchief and hugged each of his four attorneys after the verdict was read. The verdict brought to an end a criminal case that has been pending for six years. Kelly had argued from the beginning that he was not the man on the video, and the alleged victim said she was not the one who appeared either. The graphic, sordid video shows the female dancing and urinating on the floor in the man's direction. He then has sex with and urinates on her. Prosecutors say the videotape was made between Jan. 1, 1998, and Nov., 1, 2000. Chicago Sun-Times rock critic Jim DeRogatis received the video anonymously in 2002 and turned it over to police. The tape resulted in the charges against the singer, now 41, whose full name is Robert Sylvester Kelly, but it took six years for the case to go to trial. Kelly was defended by high-profile local attorneys, including Edward Genson, who is often sought by the rich and famous for his persuasive powers with jurors, and the father-son team of Sam Adam Sr. and Jr. Cook County Assistant State's Attorney Shauna Boliker took the lead for the prosecution. She has prosecuted several other high-profile cases, including against Rev. Daniel McCormack, a Catholic priest who pleaded guilty last year to abusing five boys. The trial was a string of dramatic moments. A star prosecution witness, Lisa Van Allen, testified that she'd had a sexual liaison with Kelly and the alleged victim. The defense called a mystery defense witness who was supposed to impeach her testimony and argue that she had tried to extort Kelly, but he never testified. After that, Chicago Sun-Times rock critic Jim DeRogatis was called to testify, prompting a legal battle to prevent it, Gaughan threatened to arrest DeRogatis after he did not appear in court. DeRogatis received the sex tape anonymously in 2002, and turned it over to police. Finally, DeRogatis cited the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination and declined to testify. Attorneys had said he might be accused of child p*rnography for possessing and viewing the tape. Over seven days presenting their case, prosecutors called 22 witnesses, including several childhood friends of the alleged victim and four of her relatives who identified her as the female on the video. Some said she had referred to Kelly as her "godfather." In just two days, Kelly's lawyers called 12 witnesses. They included three relatives of the alleged victim who testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape. During deliberations, the jury spent a night in a hotel after not reaching a verdict within the first afternoon. Early indications suggested disagreement about Van Allen's testimony about her alleged tryst with Kelly and the alleged victim. The jury asked Judge Vincent Gaughan for a transcript of her testimony. Gaughan initially denied the request, but later told attorneys to have the transcript ready on Friday. Around 1:30 p.m. Friday, the jury announced it had reached a verdict. Kelly won a Grammy in 1997 for "I Believe I Can Fly," and is known for such raunchy songs as "Bump N' Grind" and "Ignition," and for "Trapped in the Closet," a multipart saga about the sexual secrets of a lively and ever-expanding cast of characters. The Associated Press contributed to this report. The verdict brought to an end a criminal case that has been pending for six years. Kelly had argued from the beginning that he was not the man on the video, and the alleged victim said she was not the one who appeared either.The graphic, sordid video shows the female dancing and urinating on the floor in the man's direction. He then has sex with and urinates on her.Prosecutors say the videotape was made between Jan. 1, 1998, and Nov., 1, 2000. Chicago Sun-Times rock critic Jim DeRogatis received the video anonymously in 2002 and turned it over to police. The tape resulted in the charges against the singer, now 41, whose full name is Robert Sylvester Kelly, but it took six years for the case to go to trial.Kelly was defended by high-profile local attorneys, including Edward Genson, who is often sought by the rich and famous for his persuasive powers with jurors, and the father-son team of Sam Adam Sr. and Jr.Cook County Assistant State's Attorney Shauna Boliker took the lead for the prosecution. She has prosecuted several other high-profile cases, including against Rev. Daniel McCormack, a Catholic priest who pleaded guilty last year to abusing five boys. The trial was a string of dramatic moments. A star prosecution witness, Lisa Van Allen, testified that she'd had a sexual liaison with Kelly and the alleged victim. The defense called a mystery defense witness who was supposed to impeach her testimony and argue that she had tried to extort Kelly, but he never testified. After that, Chicago Sun-Times rock critic Jim DeRogatis was called to testify, prompting a legal battle to prevent it, Gaughan threatened to arrest DeRogatis after he did not appear in court. DeRogatis received the sex tape anonymously in 2002, and turned it over to police. Finally, DeRogatis cited the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination and declined to testify. Attorneys had said he might be accused of child p*rnography for possessing and viewing the tape. Over seven days presenting their case, prosecutors called 22 witnesses, including several childhood friends of the alleged victim and four of her relatives who identified her as the female on the video. Some said she had referred to Kelly as her "godfather." In just two days, Kelly's lawyers called 12 witnesses. They included three relatives of the alleged victim who testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape. During deliberations, the jury spent a night in a hotel after not reaching a verdict within the first afternoon. Early indications suggested disagreement about Van Allen's testimony about her alleged tryst with Kelly and the alleged victim.The jury asked Judge Vincent Gaughan for a transcript of her testimony. Gaughan initially denied the request, but later told attorneys to have the transcript ready on Friday.Around 1:30 p.m. Friday, the jury announced it had reached a verdict.Kelly won a Grammy in 1997 for "I Believe I Can Fly," and is known for such raunchy songs as "Bump N' Grind" and "Ignition," and for "Trapped in the Closet," a multipart saga about the sexual secrets of a lively and ever-expanding cast of characters.
Apparently the jury didn't see nothinnn wrongggg with a lil peeeee and grindddddd I dont know mannn i thought he was guilty, defense was SHOTTYY as hell, and i've been followin it on the frontpage in the chicago papers daily.... Don't know what happened. Speechless.
"Not Guilty" and "Innocent" do not mean the same thing in our legal system. It just means they couldn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt -- not that he didn't do it.
It means that our justice system is screwed up. A 17 year old kid goes to jail for 2 years for getting a BJ, but R kelly goes free. I don't have a problem with him getting off it just point up the discrepancy in justice for the rich.
great news. i love r. kelly. edit: the only thing that would make my life complete is if he turned my face into a toilet seat
<embed FlashVars='videoId=11926' src='http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#cccccc' width='332' height='316' name='comedy_central_player' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed>
Wow. I bet R. Kelly's next album will be a musical based on this whole ordeal coupled w/ a 10 part video. Michael Jackson and R. Kelly should hang out more.
Oh we have to post this up. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FmBRBUZ7UWc&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FmBRBUZ7UWc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<embed src="http://www.veoh.com/veohplayer.swf?permalinkId=v12545782zC2mWC6&id=anonymous&player=videodetailsembedded&videoAutoPlay=0" allowFullScreen="true" width="410" height="341" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed><br/><a href="http://www.veoh.com/">Online Videos by Veoh.com</a>
That's what SHE said! Seriously, though... isn't there a tape or movie of this? What more do they want or need to find him guilty?
think the tape that was given to the police was basically questioned..and they claimed it wasnt him on the tape
haha reminds me of that boondocks episode: huey:What the hell is wrong with you people? Every famous n**ga that gets arrested is not Nelson Mandela! Yes, the government conspires to put a lot of innocent black men in jail on fallacious charges. But R. Kelly is *not* one of those men! We all *know* the n**ga can sing, but what happened to standards? What happened to bare minimums? Are you a fan of R. Kelly? You wanna help R. Kelly? Get some counseling for R. Kelly! Introduce him to some older women! Hide his camcorder! But don't pretend that the man is a hero!... And stop the damn dancing! Act like you've got some ******* sense, people! Damn! I'm through playing around here!