1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Price the Pacers would pay for Landry

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by elnino1985, Jul 12, 2008.

  1. elnino1985

    elnino1985 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    A little bit analysis of Pacers currently salary and squad status

    1. 14 players under guaranteed contract, total salary 66.65 mil
    2. 4 free agents, 2 of them are restricted free agents
    3. 8 players in those 18 are PFs and Cs. (C: Murphy, Foster, Hibbert, Nesterovic, David Harrison(FA); PF: Baston, Granger, McRoberts, Shawn Willimas). Rush and Hibbert would surely be signed, which cause the salary to reach approx. 69.8 mil. That is 1.35 mil short of tax line.

    If they would like to offer Landry full MLE, they have to do the following

    1. don't sign with all 4 free agents. (they still have 4 Cs, 4 PFs)
    2. total salary would be 4.5 mil above tax, if they don't waive any player. They are not an immediate contender, so they are very unlikely to pay the tax.
    3. If they waive Graham and McRoberts, they can offer 2.9 mil to Landry; if they waive Graham and Baston, they can offer 4.15 mil to Landry. I am quite sure Morey would match these prices.
    4. They already have Murphy and Granger.

    So, if they don't trade, I am not quite understand why they are so interested in Landry.
     
  2. studogg

    studogg Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    6,057
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    Nice analysis. I don't think they are "that interested" in Landry. His agent needs to create waves and given the proximity to his home, and his game(s) against them last year, Indy having interest in Landry seems plausible. If they wanted to offer the full MLE, I believe that they would have already done it.
     
  3. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    We're worrying too much about this.

    I don't think next season hinges on keeping Landry, but I do think next season hinges on T-Ming staying healthy and the Rockets acquiring a point guard upgrade before the trade deadline.
     
  4. el_locoteee

    el_locoteee Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,136
    Likes Received:
    240
    We are good at PG. (Remember this NBA finals Fisher and Rondo) PG dont win championship unless is Magic.
     
  5. KePoW

    KePoW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,527
    Likes Received:
    180
    Every season hinges on T-Ming staying healthy...it just won't ever happen for the entire year.

    I do agree that Landry isn't *that* important.
     
  6. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,779
    Likes Received:
    15,094

    disagree. PG is the perfect position for the rockets to upgrade. C and SG are max players. PF is taken by landry, scola, hayes, dorsey and SF is battier.


    i think we need a upgrade somewhere and that spot makes the most sense.
     
  7. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    alston is a good starting PG. if rondo and fisher can start for finals teams, alston can. what we need is a decent backup PG who can run the offense enough so they don't look clueless like bobby did last yr in the playoffs. along with that, we need a 3rd scorer. PG isn't that bad of a problem.
     
  8. bluesinsoul

    bluesinsoul Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    1
    good analysis. correct me if i'm wrong but i think Granger is more of a SF than PF.
     
  9. Medicine N Music

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    1,249
    They also have Dunlevy, so one of them will probably start at the 4.
     
  10. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    we NEED carl landry. yao is not gonna last a whole season and we need yao for the playoffs. scola is gonna start. who's gonna be the backup? hayes? god no.

    we need to sign landry. hopefully that can be done without costing too much.
     
  11. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,929
    Likes Received:
    13,074
    I'd sign and trade Landry if we could somehow get Rush in the deal, but it would involve other players from both sides, and they have some hefty contracts in Indy (Murphy, Dunleavy, not to mention that albatross deal they gave Tinsley).
     
  12. killer instinct

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sign for something reasonable, play him but always intend to trade him at the deadline...... :eek:
     
  13. bejezuz

    bejezuz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    69
    You can't sign and trade a restricted free agent. The earliest we could trade Landry if we signed him is Dec. 15th.
     
  14. W22_STREAK

    W22_STREAK Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    616
    Pacers do indeed sound interested given Landry thrashed them at their homecourt last season. Remember how Landry posterized Diogu? That was pretty mean...

    but do they really want to spend their MLE on a bench PF?(or fringe starter?) I doubt it...Who said McRoberts is that much worse than Landry...certainly not before they were being drafted...
     
  15. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    Never mind.
     
  16. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,308
    Likes Received:
    1,926
    Josh McRoberts & Stephen Graham had team options. I know Graham's option was picked up. Baston's contract is fully guaranteed. Salaries of waived players
    still count towards the cap.
     
  17. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    796
    Granger is a wing just like dunleavy. They don't have to waive anyone to sign a player fo the mle. The team can use that anytime and it is used when over the cap. That's how NY got Jefferies and James for full mle money with maximum raises. Now the LT is another thing.
     
  18. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,308
    Likes Received:
    1,926
    Granger is PF turned SF. He still plays minutes at PF. Didn't he play mostly at PF in the games against the Rockets this past season?
     
  19. elnino1985

    elnino1985 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    I assume that Pacers won't let their salary exceeds the tax line. So, I said they can offer xxx to Landry.
     
  20. Agentzero

    Agentzero Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Take Tinsley in return if they insist on Landry.Tinsley is a good PG who can enforce our pg position.After all ,Bird has praise Tinsley " he is the one of the best PGs in nba when his brain works normally,but the time his brain works normally takes just 5 percent .
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now