1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Pops Mensa Bonsu

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Yonizzel, Dec 14, 2009.

  1. Yonizzel

    Yonizzel Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    69
    I'm having trouble trying to understand why we waived pops.

    Do we have a big man on the horizon? Or....why????
     
  2. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,520
    Likes Received:
    19,661
    Money saving move+ he'd be riding the bench with Cook. We also need the space "just in case".
     
  3. devilsdandruff

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    26
    pop probably asked out.
     
  4. worzel gummidge

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    6,533
    Likes Received:
    150
    As the Toronto broadcasters said he can make a spectacular play on one end but then follow it up on the otherside of the court by breaking plays and generally causing WTF moments.
     
  5. alex09xu

    alex09xu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    4
  6. Yonizzel

    Yonizzel Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    69
    Right, but do you really think you can compare cook with pops?

    i mean, why not just waive cook and keep pops then?
     
  7. choujie

    choujie Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    7,389
    Likes Received:
    77
    Cook has a expiring contract, that might get Rockets a draft pick or a useful player if lucky.

    Plus, Cook beats everybody in practice.
     
  8. NotInMyHouse

    NotInMyHouse Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,644
    Likes Received:
    1,023
    I think at the time he was released some people had the impression the Rockets were doing him a favor so that he could hook up with a team that could offer him more playing time. The money thing too. I guess we were on the hook for Cooks salary where Pops was non-guaranteed perhaps.
     
  9. 523744

    523744 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    605
    Likes Received:
    257
    Bingo. Of course the Rockets would love to cut Cook and keep Pops. But Cook has a guaranteed contract, while Pops had a partially guaranteed contract.
     
  10. Yonizzel

    Yonizzel Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    69
    Theres the answer to my question.

    Guys are we getting another big before deadline?
     
  11. clos4life

    clos4life Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    12,564
    Likes Received:
    15,048
    With what trade assets?
     
  12. Yonizzel

    Yonizzel Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    69
    true...

    plus we arent trying to go all the way this season so forget it i guess....
     
  13. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,447
    Likes Received:
    2,711
    Did you see what he did in Toronto yesterday? Actually getting minutes and making an impact?

    That's why. He was a good guy who deserved that opportunity, and he wasn't going to get it here playing behind Luis, Carl, Chuck, et al.

    As has been stated, Cook is a nicely sized expiring contract. 3 to 4 million is generally an ideal amount to have sitting on the bench for making the money work in a trade.
     
  14. T-Slack

    T-Slack Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,893
    Likes Received:
    81
    He wasn't really given the chance here. He played maybe2 mins. in the season opener and that was it. Maybe it was Landry's awesome play, made it where he couldn't get mins. but Pops is a better player then Cook and Doresy combine.
     
  15. madmonkey37

    madmonkey37 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    52
    Maybe hes just not that good. Its not like we are really missing his 2 pts and 2 rebs a game.
     
  16. Xsatyr

    Xsatyr Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,413
    Likes Received:
    158
    Yeah that is saying much. Dorsey was a low risk project that did not work out and Cook's expiring contract is worth keeping. Pops can can look good at times but he has played enough minutes around the league to show his limitations. If he was worth keeping then he would not be bouncing around. DM>garm, anyone want to argue this?
     
  17. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,447
    Likes Received:
    2,711
    I'm not sure what you're arguing. Of course Pops is better than Cook or Dorsey at this point in time, but those guys don't play either. It doesn't matter if you're a good player if you have 3 or 4 better players ahead of you. Especially if you have a small, partially-guaranteed contract. Waiving Pops was a good move by the Rockets to free up a roster spot and cut some money, and it was good for Pops because he actually got to go play somewhere. Even 6 minutes a game is more than he'd get here with the current rotation.

    There's really no mystery here. Nothing to figure out.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now