1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Poll: Most Americans Say Overthrowing Saddam Not a Good Reason for War

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by wnes, Oct 1, 2005.

  1. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/9205

    October 1, 2005
    Overthrowing Hussein Not Enough for War, Say Americans

    (Angus Reid Global Scan) – Many adults in the United States think the recent justification to launch the coalition effort in Iraq is insufficient, according to a poll by Knowledge Networks for the Program on International Policy Attitudes and the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. 74 per cent of respondents think that the goal of overthrowing Iraq’s authoritarian government and establishing a democracy was by itself not a good enough reason to go to war.

    Pre-war speeches by U.S. president George W. Bush mentioned specific chemical agents, such as mustard gas, sarin and VX nerve gas as banned substances allegedly secured by Iraq. State secretary Colin Powell assured the United Nations (UN) Security Council in February 2003 that the Saddam Hussein regime possessed biological weapons.

    The final report of the Iraq Survey Group—presented to the U.S. Congress on Sept. 30, 2004—concluded that Hussein’s regime did not possess chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, and had not implemented a significant program for their development.

    The coalition effort against Hussein’s regime was launched in March 2003. At least 1,936 American soldiers have died during the military operation, and more than 14,300 troops have been injured.

    In April 2004, Bush explained his rationale for military action, saying, "I was very clear about what I believed. And, of course, I want to know why we haven’t found a weapon yet. But I still know Saddam Hussein was a threat, and the world is better off without Saddam Hussein." 72 per cent of respondents say the experience in Iraq has made them feel worse about the possibility of using military force to bring about democracy in the future.

    Polling Data

    Do you think that the goal of overthrowing Iraq’s authoritarian government and establishing a democracy was by itself a good enough reason to go to war with Iraq?

    Yes 19%
    No 74%
    No answer 7%

    Has the experience in Iraq made you feel better or worse about the possibility of using military force to bring about democracy in the future?

    Better 19%
    Worse 72%
    No answer 9%

    Source: Knowledge Networks / Program on International Policy Attitudes / The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations
    Methodology: Online interviews to 808 American adults, conducted from Sept. 15 to Sept. 21, 2005. Margin of error is 3.5 per cent.
     
  2. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Doesn't really matter.

    The real reason for attacking Iraq wasn't:

    "To remove a tyrannical leader"
    or
    "To fight the war on terrorism"
    or
    "To bring democracy to an opressed nation"
    or
    "To protect the U.S. from weapons of mass destruction"

    ...

    That's all fluff. Always has been. The difference now, is that the people who used to believe all those lines now realize that none of it is true.
     
  3. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    1,631
    Funny, that's not what America said during the 2004 election. I heard loud and clear that 51% of Americans thought it was perfectly fine...at the time.
     
  4. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458

    retrospect is a mother f*cker.
     
  5. tigermission1

    tigermission1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2002
    Messages:
    15,557
    Likes Received:
    17
    There were lots of different reasons as to why Bush won in 2004, you're really oversimplifying it as being 'pro Iraq war' or 'anti Iraq war'.
     
  6. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    More like 51% of Americans are homophobes that don't really mind if their party has the interests of the rich as top priority. As long as we protect family values and make sure gays don't take over the country all is well, right?
     

Share This Page