1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Pacers: If Knicks 100% .. . They Win . . if Knicks 10% . . they lose

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Rocket River, May 30, 2000.

  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,169
    Likes Received:
    32,876
    They were Wiping the floor with the Knicks
    when the Knicks had everyone Healthy
    Ewing and Camby go down and the Pacers
    Goto to hell and have a vacation. . .

    I just don't get it

    Rocket River

    ------------------
     
  2. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,823
    Likes Received:
    5,366
    The Knicks in my opinion really can be better off without Ewing. It's not that Ewing isn't good. But with Ewing out, it really opens up the post for Larry Johnson, and you can see what has happened. Since Ewing left, Johnson has played like a man possessed. He has been the thorn in Indiana's side, and he has the ability to take over games now that Ewing isn't clogging up the middle. If you want a comparison, look at how Barkley did this season when Hakeem went down. Charles had the post to himself, and he took over. Same situation with New York. And also, Houston and Spree know they have to step it up with no Ewing. Ewing is not a huge loss, or at least not against the Pacers, who don't have the big men to take advantage. When the Knicks have gone small versus Indiana, they have taken the game over. That being said, Ewing better come back quick because they'll need Ewing and all of his 6 fouls if they have to play Shaq and the Fakers.

    ------------------
     

Share This Page