<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/M0Z7t7Vfjpk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> discuss..
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qgH1n2ZWYv0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
ok sorry.. couldnt find a good quality for the whole interview. this one is the best below <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eNZsuAw5kA0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Why not just go to the source? Found the full interview in excellent quality on foxnews.com <script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4526781&w=466&h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript> http://video.foxnews.com/v/4526781
Im surprised the hardcore leftys on this board didn't jump on this quicker. There was no real surprise in the interview as it went as I expected. Both were in their typical form. O'Reilly asks a cornered question. Obama dodges question. O'Reilly interrupts and asks the question again. Obama continues dodging O'Reilly interrupts and moves onto the next question.
Tide goes in, tide goes out. Sun comes up, sun goes down. Never a miscommunication. You can't explain that. Can't watch O'Reilly. Too stupid. Couldn't watch Olbermann. Too stupid.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hKUBTX9kKEo?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hKUBTX9kKEo?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> oh.... wait... You said Obama on O'Reilly
O'Reilly actually in recent years has toned it down quite a bit and stopped yelling at people on his show. He actually asks really good questions in a lot of his interviews. Olbermann is more like the lefts version of Glenn Beck
Apparently you missed the reference: <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nt5Xn9X6xtU?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nt5Xn9X6xtU?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> Bill O'Reilly's "****ing magnets, how do they work?" moment. Any moderately serious high school student can explain to Bill how the tides work.
also I thought it was amusing that Obama admits the NY Times is a left liberal publication.. When O'Reilly reads a quote from the Wall Street Journal Editorial he was like the Wall Street Journal will call you left bill. and said its the same as quoting the NY TIMES.
huh?? I must be missing something. What does O'Reilly say here that is so unreasonable?? I'm a atheist but I think he actually makes a valid argument. He's right its just as much of a stretch to be a atheist as it is to believe. Hmm never thought about it that way.
Oh... I don't know... the part where he asserts that Hawking can't explain how the earth rotates or how the tides work? <table style='font:11px arial; color:#333; background-color:#f5f5f5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='360' height='353'><tbody><tr style='background-color:#e5e5e5' valign='middle'><td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;'><a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.colbertnation.com'>The Colbert Report</a></td><td style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align:right; font-weight:bold;'>Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c</td></tr><tr style='height:14px;' valign='middle'><td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'<a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/370183/january-06-2011/bill-o-reilly-proves-god-s-existence---neil-degrasse-tyson'>Bill O'Reilly Proves God's Existence - Neil deGrasse Tyson<a></td></tr><tr style='height:14px; background-color:#353535' valign='middle'><td colspan='2' style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; width:360px; overflow:hidden; text-align:right'><a target='_blank' style='color:#96deff; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.colbertnation.com/'>www.colbertnation.com</a></td></tr><tr valign='middle'><td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:370183' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowFullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></embed></td></tr><tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'><td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100%' height='100%'><tr valign='middle'><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/'>Colbert Report Full Episodes</a></td><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/'>Political Humor & Satire Blog</a></td><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.colbertnation.com/video'>Video Archive</a></td></tr></table></td></tr></tbody></table> "****in' planets, how do they work?"
Comparing Olbermann to O'Reilly and Beck is absolutely absurd and ignorant, and shows that neither of you have ever watched/heard what Olbermann has to say. I won't get in an internet pissing match, but here are somethings to consider: 1. Olbermann is infinitely more educated than those two r****ds combined 2. Olbermann is and has been consistent with his views for as long as he's been on TV, and his consistency and truth to his values ended up getting him fired 3. Olbermann is not a fraud. He has some extreme views on certain issues, and I disagree plenty with him, but I know that he's not doing stuff just to draw attention to himself and get ratings. He's better than that. He truly believes what he says, unlike the two clowns For the record I'm a right-leaning centrists with libertarian values, so save me the "you're a libpig so you obviously love Olbermann" crap.
Someone must have said, "Who are you?" <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JgWQ1erBnMo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
THOSE WORDS PointForward. You are going to use THOSE WORDS on an internet message board. When we are in the midst of discussing an interview between a cable television host and the President of the United States, you invoke nightmare of Olbermann's Cornell (A&M) education? You actually want to invoke the specter of a former sportscaster having a daily television show in which he calls people like Sarah Palin the worst person in the world? THOSE WORDS!?!? Never mind the fact that you are questioning the education of Bill O'Reilly (MA from BU, MPA from Harvard), how can you do this? You cannot say this. This PointForward is too much. Because a Rockets fan, a ClutchBBS poster, a person who can let hang in mid air the prospect that Olbermann's pseudo-Cornell education trumps the one BillO received from Marist, BU, Queen Mary, and Harvard has no business being and no capacity to be the President of the United, er the authoritative poster on this subject. Good night and good luck. link
Why even give Bill the time of day? You know Faux is going to edit the hell out of the tape so Hannity and others can brainwash their viewers. O'Really? doesn't deserve an ounce of respect...from anyone.
While I think the left should stop needlessly attacking the tea party or right leaning voters, I'm disappointed that Obama would appear on Fox. There's nothing to gain from helping Murdoch promote his network as objective or independent, because it's neither.
That's not admitting the NY Times is a liberal publication. It's saying the right wing and Wall Street Journal op/ed board believes it's a liberal publication. Obama didn't say he believed it was.
