http://iht.com/articles/2005/10/13/news/weapons.php# Bush looked past Iraq on spread of weapons By Douglas Jehl The New York Times 10/13/05 -- WASHINGTON Two months before the invasion of Iraq, President George W. Bush told Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain that he "wanted to go beyond Iraq" in dealing with the spread of illicit weapons, and mentioned Saudi Arabia and Pakistan on a list of countries posing particular problems, according to a note taken by one of Blair's advisers that is cited in a new book. Bush's comment, in a private telephone conversation on Jan. 30, 2003, could be significant because it appeared to add Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to a list that previously had included public mentions only of Iraq, Iran and North Korea, which the president had dubbed an "axis of evil." The comment is reported in a new, American edition of "Lawless World," by Philippe Sands, a professor at University College, London, and a practicing barrister. An earlier edition of the book, published in Britain in February, included details from other prewar British government documents, but it did not include the detail from the Jan. 30 conversation. The British government has not questioned the authenticity of the documents described in Sands's book. The New York Times was permitted to review the contents of the Jan. 30 document cited by Sands. It shows that the notes were taken by Matthew Rycroft, then the private secretary to Blair, and addressed to Simon McDonald, then the principal private secretary to the foreign secretary, Jack Straw. The contents show that the document was marked secret and personal, and said the letter "must only be shown to those with a real need to know." The White House declined to comment, saying that any telephone conversation between Bush and Blair at that time would have been private and personal. A spokesman for the British Embassy in Washington also declined to comment. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are both close allies of the United States, and the Bush administration has been careful to avoid public criticism of them. Pakistan tested its first nuclear weapon in 1998, and the founder of its nuclear program, A.Q. Khan, has long been the subject of American concern over his role in providing nuclear technology to other countries. It has long been speculated that Saudi Arabia might also be seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, perhaps from Pakistan. But Saudi Arabia has denied having a nuclear weapons program. Neither country has been mentioned publicly by the Bush administration as possible targets of new efforts aimed at countering weapons proliferation. The notes taken by Rycroft do not provide any indication as to what Bush meant by including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan on the list of concern over so-called weapons of mass destruction, a review of the contents shows. The mention is confined to one sentence in a two-page document, which says that Bush "wanted to go beyond Iraq in dealing with WMD proliferation, mentioning in particular Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea and Pakistan." The document is revealing in other ways not mentioned in Sands's book, according to a review of its contents. It recorded a conversation between the two leaders a day before they met face-to-face in Washington The document shows that they discussed whether or not to seek a second United Nations resolution imposing an ultimatum on Iraq before launching any military action. Bush was reported to have agreed with Blair that "it made sense to try for a second resolution, which he would love to have." But Bush was also said to be "worried about Saddam playing tricks" and the possibility that Hans Blix, the top United Nations weapons inspector, would report "that Saddam was beginning to cooperate." "His biggest concern was looking weak," the British document said, describing Bush. It said that the two leaders had agreed that United Nations inspectors in Iraq should be given "weeks not months," to complete their work. The United States and Britain led the invasion of Iraq that was launched seven weeks later.
I remember when I heard Bob Woodward speak, one person asked what his biggest regret was. Apparently, Woodward had gotten hold of some source before or immediately after the war was launched that told him WMD weren't in Iraq. However, Woodward wasn't sure that one source was enough to justify an article that pretty much attacked the sole justification for the war. In hindsight, however, it wouldve been pretty slick if he pulled it off.
