1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NY might ban trans fat in eateries

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by wizkid83, Sep 27, 2006.

  1. wizkid83

    wizkid83 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    850
    This is gonna be awesome

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060927/ap_on_he_me/diet_trans_fat_ban


    YC mulls ban on trans fats in eateries

    By DAVID B. CARUSO, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 27, 2:32 AM ET

    NEW YORK - Three years after the city banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids.
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The city health department unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the city's 24,600 food service establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil.

    Artificial trans fats are found in some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french fries to doughnuts.

    Doctors agree that trans fats are unhealthy in nearly any amount, but a spokesman for the restaurant industry said he was stunned the city would seek to ban a legal ingredient found in millions of American kitchens.

    "Labeling is one thing, but when they totally ban a product, it goes well beyond what we think is prudent and acceptable," said Chuck Hunt, executive vice president of the city's chapter of the New York State Restaurant Association.

    He said the proposal could create havoc: Cooks would be forced to discard old recipes and scrutinize every ingredient in their pantry. A restaurant could face a fine if an inspector finds the wrong type of vegetable shortening on its shelves.

    The proposal also would create a huge problem for national chains. Among the fast foods that would need to get an overhaul or face a ban: McDonald's french fries, Kentucky Fried Chicken and several varieties of Dunkin' Donuts.

    Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden acknowledged that the ban would be a challenge for restaurants, but he said trans fats can easily be replaced with substitute oils that taste the same or better and are far less unhealthy.

    "It is a dangerous and unnecessary ingredient," Frieden said. "No one will miss it when it's gone."

    A similar ban on trans fats in restaurant food has been proposed in Chicago and is still under consideration, although it has been ridiculed by some as unnecessary government meddling.

    The latest version of the Chicago plan would only apply to companies with annual revenues of more than $20 million, a provision aimed exclusively at fast-food giants.

    A few companies have moved to eliminate trans fats on their own.

    Wendy's announced in August that it had switched to a new cooking oil that contains no trans fatty acids. Crisco now sells a shortening that contains zero trans fats. Frito-Lay removed trans fats from its Doritos and Cheetos. Kraft's took trans fats out of Oreos.

    McDonald's began using a trans fat-free cooking oil in Denmark after that country banned artificial trans fats in processed food, but it has yet to do so in the United States.

    Walt Riker, vice president of corporate communications at McDonald's, said in a statement Tuesday that the company would review New York's proposal.

    "McDonald's knows this is an important issue, which is why we continue to test in earnest to find ways to further reduce (trans fatty acid) levels," he said.

    New York's health department had asked restaurants to impose a voluntary ban last year but found use of trans fats unchanged in recent surveys.

    Under the New York proposal, restaurants would need to get artificial trans fats out of cooking oils, margarine and shortening by July 1, 2007, and all other foodstuffs by July 1, 2008. It would not affect grocery stores. It also would not apply to naturally occurring trans fats, which are found in some meats and dairy.

    The Board of Health has yet to approve the proposal and will not do so until at least December, Frieden said.

    The U.S.
    Food and Drug Administration began requiring food labels to list trans fats in January.

    Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard University School of Public Health, praised New York health officials for considering a ban, which he said could save lives.

    "Artificial trans fats are very toxic, and they almost surely causes tens of thousands of premature deaths each year," he said. "The federal government should have done this long ago."
     
  2. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    When we allow outright bans on smoking etc, this is what will follow. You get what you asked for.
     
  3. bladeage

    bladeage Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    153
    i think its great.
     
  4. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Sounds like something out of Atlas Shrugged.
     
  5. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,746
    Likes Received:
    12,272
    This won't happen.
     
  6. AntiSonic

    AntiSonic Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    8,318
    Likes Received:
    57
    I do too, but it's opening up a whole 'nother can of worms. There are lots of things that are bad for you, but the government shouldn't be the one keeping you from doing them.

    Plus, kiss all those FANTASTIC value menu items goodbye.
     
  7. VicVictory

    VicVictory Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, it starts with small stuff like trans fat and cigs, but what else could this lead to? Little by little, they're taking away our freedom. :mad:
     
  8. Mr. Brightside

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    18,965
    Likes Received:
    2,147
    I want little children to be banned from public places.
     
  9. Kam

    Kam Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    30,476
    Likes Received:
    1,322
    why not ban the fat people?
     
  10. arkoe

    arkoe (ง'̀-'́)ง

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    10,387
    Likes Received:
    1,598
    fat fat fat fat fat kam fat fat
     
  11. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    Pork fat rules....

    [​IMG]

    BAM!
     
  12. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    If you ban fat, the terrorists will win. :(
    Ban the parents who don't know how to control them or instill discipline into them. That's a totally different thread, though.
     
  13. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,746
    Likes Received:
    12,272
    Let's ban people from public places. We can't discriminate.

    For that matter, let's just ban public places. That makes it simple for everyone.
     
  14. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    How is any death premature?
     
  15. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    You think you're taking PAIN KILLERS, but you're really trying to commit suicide... your publicist is hot, though.
     
  16. Xerobull

    Xerobull ...and I'm all out of bubblegum
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    36,963
    Likes Received:
    35,877
    How can banning smoking and trans-fat possibly be bad?
     
  17. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,055
    Likes Received:
    3,755
    if you cant see the forest from the trees here, well..........
     
  18. Ognilecaf

    Ognilecaf Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this can be said for both sides of the arguement
     
  19. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    How could the prohibition of alcohol possibly be bad?
     
  20. Ognilecaf

    Ognilecaf Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lol....i seriously doubt people are going to be bootlegging their dunkin doughnuts on the street.....The alternative is healthier and no taste difference.....If they made cigarettes that were healthy/heathier and you could notice no difference between the two...Woulndt you want this? Its not like they are banning it nationwide in homes....Do what you want at home...This is just to protect the "avg" American that thinks,"if they sell it, it must not be that bad", But it clearly is....
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now