1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

No mo' Mo!

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Gascon, Aug 18, 2000.

  1. Gascon

    Gascon Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2000
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    3
    Just a little something to step away from the Mo Taylor whirlwind. [​IMG]

    I need someone to verify this rumor I heard. Back in '84, when we drafted Olajuwon, I understand that Portland (who picked second that year) offered us a pre-draft trade of Glyde Drexler and their #2 for either Ralph Sampson or our #1. That would mean that we were given a chance to draft Akeem (at the time) to play center, pick up Glyde to play SF, and draft a certain SG out of North Carolina with the #2 acquired from Portland.

    That would have given us the line-up of:

    Center- Olajuwon
    Power Forward- Scrub, doesn't matter
    Small Forward- Clyde Drexler
    Shooting Guard- Michael Jordan
    Point Guard- Scrub, doesn't matter

    Now, is this true, or can I sleep at night? [​IMG]

    ------------------
    "Have we not here the best cards in the game to win this easy match played for a crown?....."

    Bill Shakespeare
     
  2. RocketsPimp

    RocketsPimp Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    13,812
    Likes Received:
    194
    It's nice to think that we would have won at least 14 straight titles.

    really big [​IMG]

    ------------------
    Don't you have anything better to do?
     
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,993
    Likes Received:
    39,475
    That is an accurate trade that was turned down by the Rockets.

    DaDakota

    ------------------
     
  4. insideout

    insideout Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 1999
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    even with this team, would things still have turned out the way they do?

    would hakeem develop into the the player of 94 - 95? would drexler develop all his skills? would jordan develop his fadeaway, or even retire..? when you have three superstars like that.. who gets the ball.. ?

    but it's nice to think about [​IMG]

    ------------------
    barkley for president
     
  5. houmedman25

    houmedman25 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2000
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, if the trade part were to have gone down who's to say we would have chosen MJ with that #2 pick. I would like to think we would have. If I remember correctly, Dean Smith did speak with Bill Fitch at the time and told Bill that MJ was a sure bet to be one of the best in the NBA. Back in the 80's as we all know, the thinking was you had to have a big man to compete back then. That was certainly true back in those days.

    ------------------
    And tonight...From the Bank United Center...Your Houston Rockets and Miami Heat in Game 1 of the 2004 NBA Finals!!!!!
     
  6. TraJ

    TraJ Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think having those three guarantees multiple titles. There's no guarantee that any of them would have become the kind of player they eventually became as a result of being their teams main focus. Could they have gotten along?

    I still wish they had tried. But these are the situations that gave rise to the "hindsight is 20/20" cliche. At the time, if you would have asked just about any coach or GM, "Who would you rather have, Sampson or Jordan?" I suspect the vast majority would have chosen Sampson. In the short term, it proved to be the correct decision. It didn't take the Rockets long to reach the finals with the Twin Towers. At the time, I suspect that was "proof" that the Rockets had made the right decision.

    ------------------
     
  7. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,785
    Likes Received:
    12,546
    Hakeem would have still been great but I'm not sure how good Jordan and Clyde would have developed, since they wouldn't have been the main guy.

    Jordan would probably have been pretty good also but he used to shoot all the time and miss. It's not until he developed his little jumper did he become the best player to play the game.

    I'm not sure about clyde though. He developed much later, so he might not have been that good.

    But, definitely would have been better than sampson and rodney mccray.

    ------------------
     
  8. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042
    I dont think we would have picked Jordan if we already had Clyde. I think we would have picked Charles. Hakeem, Charles, and Clyde. Not bad either I guess. Instead of 14 straight we would have only won like 12 straight [​IMG]

    ------------------
    Fun Police Says:

    1. Posting in stupid threads is not FUN!
    2. Spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure are not FUN!
    3. Stupid BBS names are not FUN!
    4. Conduct yourself in a FUN way!

    The Fun Police are Watching.
    Vote for the Rockets & Have FUN or be Assimilated.
     
  9. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    Can someone keep this thread active? This question comes up every two months.

    ------------------
    I've posted so much that what I say must be true.

    The latest on Maurice Taylor
     
  10. Dogbelly

    Dogbelly Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2000
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Achebe,
    That profile (and pictures) of Mo in your link make me think he may not be the Rockets' solution at the PF. [​IMG]

    ------------------
    Kenny Thomas had a foul called on him in the Western Conference Finals.
     
  11. kissofdeath

    kissofdeath Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 1999
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    16
    Dogbelly -- the guy next to Mo Taylor has better size -- not a "tweener"

    ------------------
     
  12. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    LOL. [​IMG]

    I like Clutch's allusion to the song on the cover "Yo Mo"

    ------------------
    I've posted so much that what I say must be true.

    The latest on Maurice Taylor
     
  13. Miggidy Markell

    Joined:
    May 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,264
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wish that trade had gone down and we picked Charles!!!!! What a team!

    ------------------
    Miggidy Markell says:

    1. Eastcoast is da sh*t
    2. Rockets rule
    3. Hip/Hop is dope
    4. Buy the new Ruff Ryders album!

    Miggidy Markell is watching
    Stay STRAPPED & WATCH ya back or be Assimilated.
     
  14. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,785
    Likes Received:
    12,546
    Who was picked fourth that year ahead of charles?

    1 Akeem Olujawon
    2 Sam Bowie
    3 Michael Jordan
    4 ?????
    5 Charles Barkley

    ------------------
     
  15. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,928
    Likes Received:
    4,892
    Who was picked fourth that year ahead of charles?

    Sam Perkins.


    ------------------
     
  16. Gascon

    Gascon Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2000
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sorry, Achebe, didn't mean to offend. I've only been posting for a little over a month. I just wanted confirmation.....and to stop talking about Mo Taylor. [​IMG]

    ------------------
    "Have we not here the best cards in the game to win this easy match played for a crown?....."

    Bill Shakespeare
     
  17. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458
    I would personally like to thank you Gascon, for starting this thread. Despite what Achebe said, I can only threads read about Mo' for so long. Its good to have some sort change on this board, something else interesting to talk about. The '84 draft theories are always good for that.

    Even if we do talk about them every other month... [​IMG]



    ------------------
    Ugh, Another Rockets off-season....I'm gonna need a keg
    of Pepto-Bismol.
     
  18. NewGuy

    NewGuy Guest

    Well that could've happened if we had drafted Clyde instead of McCray and then accepted Chicago's offer of the #3 for Sampson. Different routes, same results, championships championships championships.

    ------------------
     

Share This Page