1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[NJ.com] Blazers could foil Nets' quest for Abdur-Rahim

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Deuce, Jul 12, 2005.

  1. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    Interesting, the Blazers want a 1st round pick from NJ to do the S&T for NJ's Trade Exception. I am surprised that NJ is balking at that right now and only offering a 2nd rounder. They are in "win now" mode with Kidd/Carter. They should just pony up the 1st rounder. Dont they have a few laying around from the Kenyon Martin deal (even thought they gave up 2 for Carter).

    If you are the Rockets and the Grizzlies say they are asking for a 1st rounder in a S&T deal to get us Swift...would we balk? I think we would make the trade.

    ###

    http://www.nj.com/nets/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-0/1121146941286360.xml&coll=1

    Blazers could foil Nets' quest for Abdur-Rahim
    Tuesday, July 12, 2005
    BY DAVE D'ALESSANDRO
    Star-Ledger Staff

    The Portland Trail Blazers have decided to play hardball, and the Nets' pursuit of Shareef Abdur- Rahim may be submarined by their former general manager.

    John Nash, the Blazers' GM who filled that job for the Nets from 1996-2001, said yesterday that he has no interest in the Nets' trade exception, which was their only tool by which to execute a sign-and-trade deal for the free agent and offer him a larger contract than the other teams bidding for him.

    "The trade exception doesn't interest us -- we'd have no use for it," said Nash, whose team is in a cost-cutting mode. "We would be only amenable to discussing draft picks."

    This means that if Abdur- Rahim is interested in playing for New Jersey -- and he is "very" inclined, people close to him are now saying -- the Nets are being told by Nash that they will have to surrender a first-round draft pick if they want to give the 28-year-old forward a contract a player of his stature deserves.

    And the clock is ticking.

    "I never thought this would be painless," Nets president Rod Thorn said yesterday. "(The Blazers) will play their cards, and we'll see when the dust settles. They have given us no indication that it will get done with the things we've been talking about. So now we have to keep our options open."

    Abdur-Rahim was in Sacramento yesterday with agent Aaron Goodwin to meet with Kings officials, and that will be his last visit until further notice. As for pre- scheduled visits to San Antonio and Miami, Goodwin said, "Well, we don't know yet. We're going to sit back and figure out the next move. There's so much going on right now."

    The reason: Player and agent want to see what the Nets and Portland can work out in Las Vegas, where Nash and Thorn are attending the Reebok Pro Summer League.

    Like other suitors over the cap, the Nets can offer Abdur-Rahim their midlevel exception, which is the extra fund that all capped-out teams can use on free agents. That calls for a starting salary of $4.9 million with 8 percent annual raises, and stretched out over a maximum of five years, it would total $28.4 million.

    Unlike the others, the Nets wanted to offer Abdur-Rahim a sign-and-trade deal involving his former team. They would do this by sending their $4.9 million trade exception to Portland -- that's the money left over from the Kerry Kittles deal, an extra bankroll that can be used to purchase an existing contract. It's far more lucrative this way: This transaction would involve 10.5 percent raises and could run for six years. The total would be $37.1 million.

    "I would say that's a considerable difference," Goodwin said.

    Portland could use the trade exception for future deals. But Nash claims he wouldn't use it, because it would take the Blazers over the luxury tax threshold.

    So Nash is demanding a first- round pick to go with it.

    The Nets, in turn, won't come off their offer of a second-rounder.

    "It's a deal-breaker," a Nets official said last night. "And they're aware of that. They're not going to get (Abdur-Rahim) back, so why lose him for nothing? They don't want players. So this is a perfect thing."

    Nash, however, didn't make it sound as though there was any 'give' here.

    "Look, they can sign him with their midlevel. They don't need us," the Blazers exec said, matter-of- factly. "I have no idea what Goodwin is looking for at this point. We're not negotiating with him."

    Goodwin, meanwhile, sounded as though he is prepared to exert some pressure on the Nets to get a sign-and-trade deal done -- even at the cost of a first-rounder -- because the Spurs and Heat are likely to ante up their midlevels.

    "At the end of the day, if (New Jersey is) where Shareef wants to be, Rod has to work that out," the agent said. "We saw this coming the whole time. It's no surprise. It's up to New Jersey to work it out."

    He can be certain that Thorn shares his urgency.

    "I would doubt it could go beyond this week," Thorn said. "Something has to be done one way or the other in a timely fashion."
     
  2. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    The NBA season is too fragile to spend #1 picks on mediocre power forwards. Jason Kidds knees are already wobbly, and one torn ACL could be the difference between the playoffs and the worst record in the NBA. Unless the Nets are certain that the pick they're giving up is in the low 20's, SAR isn't worth it.
     
  3. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    I think SAR is a bit more than a "mediocre PF". Juwan Howard is a "mediocre PF". SAR is a just below all-star level PF.

    To me, the Nets have minimal front court players, they have 1st rounders. If I am them I am giving it up for SAR. SAR is still quite young. He is better than anything they will get in the 1st round next year. Again, they are in "win now" mode. They can't play "scared" because of Kidd's knees.
     
  4. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    Easy negotiating point. Make the pick Lottery protected and have it due within 2 or 3 seasons. Seems like a good compromise if they want to get it done.
     
  5. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,950
    Likes Received:
    33,697
    That's just plain greed if you ask me. You got three first-rounders in the Kenyon Martin deal, and Denver really could have/should have signed him outright. So why wasn't one second round pick enough for the Nets then? Didn't they tell themselves, "We're not going to get (Martin) back, so why lose him for nothing?"

    Geez, cough up a first rounder already.
     
  6. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    Absolutely!
     
  7. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    I think they gave up 2 1st rounders to get Carter. But they still should have enough in the bank to do other things.

    If you are a Nets fan right about now arent you sick? I mean they could lose out on SAR because the Nets want to hold onto a 2006 1st round pick....and the 2006 Draft might be the worst in recent history with the age limit. Ridiculous!
     
  8. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Well, nothing is really a suprise. Everyone is just trying to get "theirs."

    IF the Rockets come into the same situation, I doubt you would see much hesitation from us, we've never been too attatched to picks, especially w/ JVG around. But I doubt the Grizz would be interested in picks anyways.
     
  9. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    Nets have to be kidding if they don't toss it at them. Lottery protected? Add SAR to their lineup and they're gold for no worse than 46 wins and 5th in the East. They're giving up pick #20 or so. DO IT.
     
  10. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    OK, I didn't read the article closely enough. It looks to me that Nash just has an axe to grind with his former employer. SAR isn't worried about money as much as being on a winner. It's clearly SAR's decision to sign where he wants to, so he has to decide whether an extra $9 million is worth it to pass up a much better shot at a title with Miami or San Antonio. It looks like the Nets are in a no win situation, because I don't think Nash will demand a first rounder from Miami or San Antonio. If the Nets are going to lose him to Miami or San Antonio, then they should tell Nash to stick that pick up his you-know-what...
     
  11. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    You know what, forget what I said...I need some coffee...
     
  12. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,057
    Likes Received:
    15,230
    I've got some for you.
     
  13. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    :)

    I wasn't looking at this from the Nets POV. This is the only way to get SAR, so if they want him THAT badly, then it might be worth the risk. My only concern is whether he's worth it as a player. He can score, but his rebounding and defense have declined. I guess they'll have to give up the first rounder to find out.
     
  14. Relativist

    Relativist Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    241
    I'm not hugely enamoured with SAR, but when you consider the type of money other free agents have been getting this and last offseason, SAR for MLE money and a first-rounder is a no-brainer. I guess there's nothing wrong with posturing, but if they let this in any way interfere with signing SAR, they're stupid.
     
  15. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    This is just lunacy! I can't believe Thorn is balking at giving up a 1st rounder. It probably isnt even going to be a lottery pick! This is a battle of egos. Ridiculous!

    http://www.nj.com/nets/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-0/1121233869148810.xml&coll=1

    Thorn: 'I'm not giving a No. 1 pick' to get Abdur-Rahim
    Wednesday, July 13, 2005
    BY DAVE D'ALESSANDRO
    Star-Ledger Staff

    The Nets have already invested a great deal of time, energy and fawning attention toward the recruitment of Shareef Abdur-Rahim in the past 13 days, but the one thing they are not prepared to pay is the price of a first-round draft pick, Rod Thorn reiterated last night.

    The Nets president said he did not speak yesterday with Portland general manager John Nash, who is holding the Nets up for a No. 1 pick in exchange for agreeing to do a sign-and-trade deal that will get the free-agent forward the $37 million contract he believes he deserves.

    Thorn is eager to give Abdur-Rahim his market value. He just doesn't want to give in to Nash and Blazers owner Paul Allen, who seem just as eager to let Abdur-Rahim leave Portland without compensation they could have in the form of a $4.9 million trade exception that can be used in future deals.

    The only question is this: Don't the Nets believe Abdur-Rahim is worth the price of a first-round pick, especially since they have two of them?

    "That's fair. Everyone looks at things differently," Thorn said last night from Las Vegas. "But I'm not interested in giving up one of our No. 1 picks, I'll say that."

    That statement may come as some surprise to agent Aaron Goodwin, who believes he can line up a deal worth $28 million with a number of teams -- Sacramento, Miami, San Antonio -- that involve the midlevel exception, the extra fund that capped-out teams can spend on free agents. If the Nets cannot execute a sign-and-trade transaction with Portland, they'll be just another contender rather than the front-runner.

    Goodwin, who could not be reached for comment, will undoubtedly try to convince Thorn that his client is worth more to the Nets than a pick that could fall somewhere between 18 and 25 if the Nets are a playoff team.

    "Sure, we've had these conversations," Thorn repeated. "But I'm not giving a No. 1, I'll tell you that right now."

    And Nash, who is stonewalling because he can, claims to have no use for the Nets' trade exception and doesn't think a No. 2 pick is enough to earn his cooperation.

    Thorn added that despite talk to the contrary, he has no commitment from Abdur-Rahim if he is able to pull off the Portland deal.

    "Until you get these kind of things done, I'm never confident. There are too many variables," Thorn said. "Players are being talked to every day, there are attempts at deals every day. So until you get it done, it doesn't mean anything.

    "So we're doing our due diligence, because who knows whether we'll be able to deal with (Portland), and who knows what Shareef's going to do?"

    Toward that end, Thorn and GM Ed Stefanski met with Stromile Swift in Las Vegas yesterday. Swift, while not nearly as polished as Abdur-Rahim, would be a fair consolation prize, as he is longer, blocks more shots and runs the floor better.

    The recurring challenge would be to get Memphis -- Swift's former team -- to cooperate in the same kind of sign-and-trade deal that Portland is resisting.

    For now, Thorn only knows that he's close to pulling the plug on the Blazers.

    "It's going to play out in the next few days," he said.

    The timing is important for another reason: Any minute now, the NBA is expected to announce the salary cap for next season, which is based on revenues and expenditures from last season.

    An official in the players' association surmised yesterday that it will increase dramatically -- up to as much as $48 million or $49 million per team, up from its present $43.8 million -- which means that others might jump into the hunt for the desirable free agents after learning that they have more money to spend.
     
  16. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,910
    Likes Received:
    13,042
    Hold on a second.

    The Nets won't yield a first-round pick? For SHAREEF ABDUR-RAHIM?

    I'd think this was a joke---a media fantasy; April Fool's, and all that.

    Hunh. Well, we'd better have something brewing for Stromile Swift, and I don't mean a fart, because we would kill ourselves to put our eggs all in one basket if we hope that Swift or Walker just go ahead and sign for the MLE, and then Memphis or Boston was negotiating a sign and trade with some other team the whole time.

    Hell, I'd say sign Eddie Griffin for what the Wolves are offering (shot-blocking, three point shooting) if it weren't for the fact that Eddie + Sugar Land = Bad News Waiting to Happen.
     
  17. Chilly_Pete

    Chilly_Pete Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2001
    Messages:
    2,877
    Likes Received:
    2,034
    http://www.nypost.com/sports/nets/25888.htm

    SHAREEF ON HOLD, SO NETS COURT SWIFT

    By FRED KERBER


    July 13, 2005 -- What the Nets want to give, the Blazers don't want, and what the Blazers want, the Nets won't give.
    So Nets brass, while still placing Shareef Abdur-Rahim atop its power-forward wish list, stepped up a contingency scenario by meeting yesterday in Las Vegas with Memphis free agent Stromile Swift.

    The Nets' approach has been to try to land Abdur-Rahim from Portland through a sign-and-trade with their $4.9 trade exception and a second-round draft pick, but the Blazers are adamant that they have no interest in the trade exception and want a No. 1. Conversely, the Nets are loathe to part with a No. 1 pick.

    Nets president Rod Thorn, in Las Vegas, had no additional talks with Portland and claimed the situation was "nowhere." While Thorn declined to reveal any particulars of his previous talks, he indicated it would be "fair to say" he would not part with any first-round pick, including a 2007 pick that Blazers GM John Nash indicated could get it done. The Blazers could lose Abdur-Rahim and get nothing in return if he takes a mid-level exception offer.

    "The trade exception is not a valuable thing to us," Nash, the former Nets GM, said, expressing luxury-tax concerns. "A future first is also something that is desirable for the very reason that to use it would bring back another salary."

    But the Nets pretty much are saying dream on. "We're not giving up a No. 1," one team official repeatedly stressed.

    "Right now, though, the talks are nowhere," said Thorn, who claimed he expects a resolution of the Abdur-Rahim issue "in the next few days."



    The Nets have had contact with Swift's camp, but the fact the power forward met them in Vegas seemed positive. Swift was a guy the Nets considered before drafting Kenyon Martin in 2000. There are concerns regarding his practice habits, but the Nets feel they have a self-policing team. The 6-9, 225-pound Swift, 25, is a 9.0-point, 5.0-rebound career performer. Abdur-Rahim, 28 and 6-9, 245 pounds, carries career numbers of 19.8 points and 8.1 rebounds.

    Still, the Nets are not giving up on Abdur-Rahim. The problem is how to do it.

    "Until Shareef's agent calls and suggests a sign-and-trade, it's a moot point," said Nash.

    The Nets have had cursory conversations with Memphis about a possible sign-and-trade involving Swift. Memphis GM Jerry West could not be reached for comment yesterday.

    The Nets' third option is Toronto's Donyell Marshall, 32.
     
  18. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yes, or two 2nds from NJ, or switch NJs 1st and Portland's 2nd. These guys are butt heads.

    BTW I'll trade Portland an expiring contract and our 06 1st rounder for SAR, if the 1st rounder seems to be such a big deal to Portland. Maybe even the NY 2nd or a servicable player too (Wesley/James).
     
  19. VesceySux

    VesceySux World Champion Lurker
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    7,552
    Likes Received:
    234
    I really don't like the sound of that.
     
  20. Got Em

    Got Em Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    1
    Oh Lord, the Nets are stupid to not lock up SAR at 6 years at the MLE. How many first round choices do they need? Do we still have 2 exceptions that add up to 5 million? We could just do that and give them a first round pick.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now