1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

most important?hakeem or taylor & anderson?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by leebigez, Jul 30, 2001.

  1. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    796
    the rockets need to assess who's more important to the rockets playoff hopes.which lineup would you rather go to war with.franchise,cat,anderson,griffin,hakeem vs franchise,cat,langhi,taylor,cato.i think clearly the first one has a better shot than the second one.if this is true and consiering in 2 years duncan will be free,i can come up with one solution.resign hakeem at 7mil per for 2 seasons,resign bullard and norris,and let anderson and taylor move on.like it or not,when eddie progresses,taylor and anderson will just be a contract you're going to have to sucker someone into taking.squash all that and look for the future and go with that.everyone is down on hakeem saying he should take it and be happy.how could he do that looking at soft ass 10pts per game dave robinson getting 24mill for 2 years and cato on his own team eating up 7 mill a year.its a matter of pride and principle.give hime at least 7per year,let anderson and taylor walk and you wont have the p.r. nightmare for letting the greatest player in houston's history play in another uniform.respect is the name of the game

    ------------------
    everett
     
  2. Behad

    Behad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 1999
    Messages:
    12,358
    Likes Received:
    193
    This is your fourth thread you started saying the same thing. Stop redundant threads!

    And mix in some punctuation and some capitalization and some sentence structure.

    ------------------
    A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.
     
  3. Behad

    Behad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 1999
    Messages:
    12,358
    Likes Received:
    193
  4. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    796
    you are right newbiehead,but how hard could it be?the game of basketball hasn't changed,basketball is still played from the inside out.actually kenny thomas is a better rebounder and inside than mo taylor.the thing i didn't like is him shooting 3's,but that rudy fault.to me,taylor is just way too soft to be any factor even 2-3 years from now.he was a terrible rebounder at michigan,and 5 years 40lbs later,he's still a terrible rebounder.old ass hakeem put up better numbers thatn he did and he's 38yrs old.people will be saying the same thing about mo taylor 5 years from now,tremendous talent just can't put it together.thats going to be him.lets stop wasting time,play the rookie,resign the legend and move forward.

    ------------------
    everett
     
  5. Behad

    Behad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 1999
    Messages:
    12,358
    Likes Received:
    193
    What I'm trying to help you with is the fact that you've said this...5 times now...by starting new threads. New threads, especially new threads that are impossible to read without severe eye strain, are simply pushing good, active threads to the bottom. You stated your piece and got good responses in this thread:

    http://bbs.clutchcity.net/ubb/Forum3/HTML/014220.html

    So why keep repeating yourself in new threads?

    And dude, I'm telling ya, use some capitalization and sentence structure. Please.

    ------------------
    A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.
     
  6. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    thank you newbiehad.

    ------------------
    Rockets 2001: lo creo, lo creo!!
     
  7. pippendagimp

    pippendagimp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2000
    Messages:
    27,812
    Likes Received:
    22,824
    I luv new threads [​IMG]

    ------------------
     
  8. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    I read the original structurally deficient post, so I deserve a freebie. It takes longer than it should when sentence structure is absent, and we should be compensated for our wasted effort...

    I think there was something worth commenting on in there, but I'm not going to read it again just to find it. [​IMG]

    ------------------
     

Share This Page