1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Mobley for Eric Snow?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Parlett316, Feb 15, 2003.

  1. Parlett316

    Parlett316 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    12
    It's apparant the Rockets need a real point guard and I like Snow's unselfish play.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. Shooter1583

    Shooter1583 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's a decent idea...Philly could use Mobley's scoring, whether it's off the bench or alongside Iverson. We could definitely use Snow's leadership and defense. I don't know if it works cap wise, but I would pull the trigger on that deal. Although, Larry Brown might have second thoughts because of Mobley's defense (or lack thereof).
     
  3. Parlett316

    Parlett316 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    12
    We can always hope for a three way deal :)
     
  4. James23

    James23 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    0
    oh my God!!! eric snow? he would have been if it were 3 years ago. the guy has broken down; he's done as a starting point guard in the nba. why would the rox want to trade a 5-year old toyota mr2 for a 10-year corolla? don't make sense.
     
  5. themocitydon

    themocitydon Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    it would be a good deal. finally the rockets could have a decent point guard that can get other players involved in the offense. cmon, lets be serious. i'd rather have eric snow running the point passing the ball and taking care of the ball, than to have steve FRANCIS (who should be a 2 instead) shoot the ball before passing. nor moochie norris aka MR. TURNOVER lose the ball on every possesion.
     
  6. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,148
    Likes Received:
    2,817
    There is no reason to trade Mobley for a PG (there is no reason to trade him at all, but that is a different discussion). The offense for this team is going to run through one of two guys, Steve and Ming. It is rediculous to think that Steve would stop dominating the ball because he was playing alongside Eric Snow, Marco Jaric, or Andre Miller for that matter. That is like thinking that the Bulls in the Jordan years or the Hakeem led Rockets needed a traditional point guard. A PG on this team wouldn't do anything. If you are going to trade Mobley (a horrible idea, because of his salary you WILL NOT get a better player in return), get a shooter, not a distributor, because he will see precious little of the ball. For some reason every opposing team's announce crew recognizes that Cat is a good player, but the Rocket "fans" can't (or more likely won't) see it.
     
  7. carayip

    carayip Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    20
    I agree with everything you said. We said our players don't "get it" but apparently some of fans don't "get it" as well. :rolleyes:

    Everyone said that this is Steve Francis's team and proclaimed Mobley as our role player. When we win, everyone is anxious to praise our leader Francis (I've also given him props). But when we lose, it's the role player's (Mobley) fault? :rolleyes: Come on your team is only as consistent as your best player you know, not your role player. When we lose, your best player needs to take the responsibility, not your role player!

    As I said in the game thread, the worst thing happened to us is when Francis hit everything at Utah and we won that game. That probably made him think that we could win any game with him playing that way. Just remember what happened after that Lakers game.

    Well I don't actually know what I want to say. I just want to say: Please STOP blaming Mobley. STOP hating Mobley. STOP the Mobley trade suggestion. :mad:

    PS. I am not a Steve hater. I love him. I am not suggesting trading our best player.
     
    #7 carayip, Feb 15, 2003
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2003
  8. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Carayip:

    Do you think he's a good backcourt partner for Steve? Or do you just object to the position that the Rockets need a true 1?

    More than anything else, I dislike having two identical players - neither of whom play good defense - in the backcourt together.

    Even if we don't trade for a 1, then we'd still need a taller shooting guard who bases his game on sticking the 3 and playing defense rather than having a game that slow closely mimics Steve's.
     
  9. carayip

    carayip Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    20
    Some points:

    1st, I think Mobley's a lot better defender than Francis. The one who doesn't put effort on defense is our supposed team leader Francis, not Mobley.

    2nd, I think Mobley is adjusting his game to be the 3rd option now. He played within the offense a lot more than before. And contrary to popular belief, I don't think he needs to change his game much. He's a shooting guard. Of course he shoots 1st pass 2nd. I don't think the problem is Mobley so there's no reason to trade him for a PG or another SG.

    3rd, getting a true PG and moving Francis to 2 is not the answer. If he wants to dominate the ball, he's going to dominate it at 1 or 2. Plus, he really can't play the 2 because he can't defend the 2.

    4th, contrary to popular belief, I think Francis needs to change his game more than Mobley. If he doesn't make the change, getting a true 1 or a different 2 still can't make us a better team. Francis needs to get his teammates (especially his center) involved more and creates easier shots for his teammates a lot more thus make his teammates better (and make his team better) while at the same time still looks for his shots especially when needed. He needs to get the balance between passing and shooting right. Francis also needs to play a lot better defense (at least put more effort on it). If he does that, I don't see any problem in our backcourt. And I am willing to give him time. Well basically we have no choice but to give him time because as I said before if he doesn't make the change, I don't think getting a true 1 or a different 2 will matter much.

    5th, I think the current Steve Francis looks a lot like the American Paulo Di Canio than Cuttino Mobley. You must assume that many people here don't know who Di Canio is. But unfortunately I know! :p
     
    #9 carayip, Feb 15, 2003
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2003
  10. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    carayip: You're supposed to know! What fun is an inside joke if *nobody* gets it ;)?

    In response...

    1. Mobley is a better defender than Francis. Agreed. Unfortunately, we need a larger guard to deal with the bigger 2's. Mobley and Francis are a dream for guards who like to post up.

    2. Ah... yes, most 2's shoot first. Unfortunately, that's not what I'm referring to. I mean, rather, they play the same way. They're both well known for driving, before shooting... breaking down their man off the dribble. Even if you benched Francis... you'd still need the same kind of player to compliment Mobley. A big guard who plays D and sticks the 3. Plus, both have poor court vision.

    3. Irrelevant.

    4. Redundant.

    5. Yes, but Steve would be more of a Patrick Kluivert, since he's a franchise caliber player :).
     
  11. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Steve doesn't need to dominate the ball more than Allen Iverson.

    Mobley for Snow wouldn't work. We need a to make it a 3-way, who has a PG nd needs a SG?
     
  12. crossover

    crossover Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2001
    Messages:
    2,049
    Likes Received:
    799
    i don't see why philly would do it

    we don't trade mobley because he's necessarily so much worse than francis... (some people wouldn't even want franchise now)

    we trade mobley because obviously our starting five doesn't work
    and mobley won't be happy with bench play and francis isn't really tradeable (plus market value)

    it doesn't matter if francis needs to change more or not... most people will agree he has to chance more than anyone on the team - partly because he is the PG... but he can change after we make some moves. this team has problems throughout
     
  13. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
    You've got to be smoking dope...

    Eric Snow...This is like trading for a Pinto for a Focus...errr... I mean a Malibu...

    Your probably right though, I don't think we'll get Jack for the CAT...

     
  14. carayip

    carayip Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    20
    You must be as confused as Steve about Steve's role. Steve should be more of a playmaker and scorer combination like Di Canio or Rivaldo. Both are more franchise caliber than Kluivert who is a primary shooter type. :D
     
  15. Rockets-R-Us

    Rockets-R-Us Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    9
    I plead ignorance with the references you guys are making. Are these NHL or Euro B-ball players?

    Anyway, my 2 cents: If we do trade Mobley, I agree that we don't necessarily need a true PG (unless we finish out of the playoffs and then I could see moving Steve to the 2). What I want for this team is a pure outside gunner like Finley is for the Mavs!!

    I know we can't get Finley, that's not what I was saying. I just want us to find someone who can drill the Trey on a better than 33% clip!!!!!!!!!
     
  16. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,260
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    If we had a player like Redd with us as well I would probably trade Mobley for Snow. But we must look for equal talent when we make any trade even though Snow is a smarter player than Mobley.
     
  17. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd love to have Micheal Redd.

    Mobley and MoT for Redd and Anthony Mason?
     
  18. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,260
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    Sane that trade looks even on paper but the Bucks lose out on toughness that Mason brings even though he is aging.Redd is taller and has better shooting range than Mobley. Mo-T is getting somewhat better but is still inconsistent. However if the Bucks agreed to the deal I would pull the trigger on it even though I would hate to see either one of them go.
     
  19. Genesis 71

    Genesis 71 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2002
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wish I had said that. Steve is very talented, but also has a pivotal role to playon this team. His growth is crucial to the Rocket's aspirations. I am more concerned with his (Francis') improvement , than what to do with Cuttino.
     
    #19 Genesis 71, Feb 15, 2003
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2003
  20. Huskie303

    Huskie303 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    If your going to trade Mobley who has value get something out of it not Eric Snow. Possibley Jason Terry or Andre Miller, they would help the rockets a lot more than Eric Snow.
     

Share This Page