1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Mo Taylor appealing ban, doesn't think it's right (Chron)

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Sane, Nov 9, 2003.

  1. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rockets' Taylor gets second suspension
    Ten-game penalty to be appealed
    By JONATHAN FEIGEN
    Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle
    RESOURCES




    Rockets forward Maurice Taylor was hit Friday with his second suspension in the past three seasons for violating the NBA/National Basketball Players Association Anti-Drug Program. But Taylor immediately appealed the ruling and disputed the findings, an NBA players association spokesman said Friday.

    Taylor said he was not permitted to comment.

    Taylor was with the team for its shoot-around prior to tonight's game against the Orlando Magic, but he could not be in the arena for the game, pending the outcome of an appeal.

    "He told us he didn't think it was right but I'm supporting him 100 percent," guard Steve Francis said. "That's all we can do is support him and not look at the bad part of this situation."


    National Basketball Players Association spokesman Dan Wasserman, when asked if Taylor was appealing the findings and 10-game suspension, said: "Oh absolutely. It's been filed. It's in the process of being filed immediately."

    An appeal of any kind, and especially one filed so quickly, is rare in such cases but will not allow Taylor to play while waiting for a hearing. The suspension begins with tonight's game against the Orlando Magic at Toyota Center.

    The NBA collective bargaining agreement allows the union to expedite no more than two suspension appeals per season. But even an expedited appeal would not be heard for 10 days, rather than the customary 30 days, keeping Taylor out for at least six games even if he wins his appeal.

    "The authority for this discipline does not exist in the collective bargaining agreement," Wasserman said. "We think it's a completely improper application of the drug program. We've asked for an expedited appeal to allow for an arbitrator to conduct a hearing as quickly as is possible."

    Asked what part of the ruling the players association considered "improper," Wasserman cited the ruling that Taylor was in "non-compliance" and that Taylor was given a 10-game suspension.

    "We don't discuss any part of our anti-drug program publicly," NBA vice president of basketball communications Tim Frank said.

    A typical suspension would be five games, and a repeat offense does not automatically merit a suspension twice as long. Test results and suspensions are determined by an independent medical director hired by the union and the league.

    The league's anti-drug policy states "a veteran player's failure to comply with his inpatient or aftercare treatment while in the program will result in substantial fines and suspensions, which will be imposed until that player fully complies with the requirements of the program."

    Taylor, 27, said he could not comment about whether he was ruled to have failed a league drug test, what substance he is accused of using or if he was in violation of another part of the league's substance-abuse program.

    Rockets general manager Carroll Dawson and Wasserman said they were not given that information.

    But there was speculation Taylor's appeal could maintain that a medicine he took while rehabilitating his dislocated left shoulder last month triggered the positive test results. The program bans: amphetamine and its "analogs;" cocaine; LSD; opiates (heroin, codeine and morphine); PCP; mar1juana; and steroids.

    Taylor's 10-game suspension could increase if he loses his appeal and fails to comply with the league and players association treatment program. Those steps are not made public.

    Taylor had previously been suspended for the first five games of last season for a violation of the league's substance-abuse policy in 2001-02 when he was out with a ruptured left Achilles' tendon. His suspension indicated it was his third violation of the anti-drug program.

    Dawson informed Taylor of the league's ruling but is not given information about how Taylor violated league policy. A suspension can be given out for failing a drug test, failing to take a scheduled test or other violations of aftercare programs.

    Taylor, the Rockets' second-highest paid player, signed a six-year, $48.75 million contract before the 2001-2002 season. He missed that entire season because of the Achilles' injury. Overweight and still battling that injury, he averaged a career-low 8.4 points per game last season. He is averaging 9.8 points and 4.5 rebounds, but was coming off his best game since coming back from the shoulder injury, scoring 14 points and grabbing seven rebounds against the Nets.

    The suspension, if upheld, will cost him $86,666 for each game he misses.

    When Taylor was found in violation of the league's substance policy in 2001, he insisted on holding a news conference to announce the suspension and said that he had "experimented with mar1juana." Though he was not obligated to provide details to the media or the Rockets, he told team officials he wanted to admit he had failed a drug test.

    Losing Taylor on the heels of the indefinite suspension given Eddie Griffin could be devastating. Without Taylor, the Rockets' top scorers off the bench are Moochie Norris and Bostjan Nachbar, each averaging 4.3 points per game.

    With Griffin out since Oct. 16, center Kelvin Cato has started at power forward. Rookie Torraye Braggs and Scott Padgett are the only power forwards on the active roster.

    The Rockets are permitted to place Taylor on a suspended list and replace him on the active roster. Dawson said he has not discussed a move with Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy.

    "It's tough," Dawson said. "It's very upsetting. You get a lot of anticipation going into this year, this building, new everything. Things are going well. Looking at it from a coach's perspective, anything that disrupts you when things are going well is not looked upon very well.

    "Those are two pretty good players we don't have right now. Things are rolling along pretty well. I could see progress on a lot of levels."
     
  2. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Make what you want out of it. It's interesting that players rarely appeal against these decisions, and something interesting to know is that whether he wins or not, he'll be out AT LEAST 6 games.
     
  3. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,100
    Likes Received:
    447
    What happens if it turns out the results were wrong? How does a team get back the games it's player loses while he is wrongfully suspended? Considering how reare appeals are, they should change the rules and allow a player to play until after an appeal is processed.
     
  4. magicoz1

    magicoz1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0

    You're right. MLB allows the players to parcipate while their appeal is being processed. It makes more sense
     
  5. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Dude, this article was posted two days ago HERE in the "Mo Taylor to be Suspended Again" thread.

    LOCK

    -- droxford
     
  6. We're Back

    We're Back Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Appeals probably would not be so rare if players didn't serve their suspensions until after their appeal. Anyways, it would be sort of dangerous to let a guy that tested positive for something serious to do so. Free MO!!!!!!!!!
     
  7. DLev

    DLev Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2002
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly.
    MLB players appeal suspensions so they can play against a good team, and then drop them to sit out against bad teams. They just manipulate the system.
     
  8. danjojo

    danjojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2002
    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    0
    What would be right would be for the Rockets to trade him to the Jailblazers
     
  9. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Point being, who believes him?

    It's nice to see Francis standing by him, to me that means Mo is telling the truth because, although he stood by Griffin, he didn't say that Griffin was innocent.
     
  10. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    apeals are rare because by the time a player gets his hearing his suspension s usually over.

    i.e. a quick hearing will take place in 10 days (6 games). the actuall suspension of a first time pot head is 5 games. so there is no point.
     
  11. Thanos

    Thanos Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Of course there is a point. Maybe not an immediate one, but long term, it's paramount we know who the Rockets signed to such a huge contract.

    It hardly the same thing if it was his and his medics' stupidity that got him into this mess for taking medication he shouldn't, or if the man lacks character and we can expect him to do this again in the future.

    Of course it makes a difference. Hopefully it's the former and not the letter.
     
  12. RC Cola

    RC Cola Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    1,347
    I would think some players would appeal a suspension, even one that would take them out longer than their suspension, just for the money issue. A player who misses 5 games could lose a pretty good deal of money. I forgot how much Eddie's was, but it was up there for EACH game he missed. I would think that a player would not want to lose 20 grand each game, so they would appeal and not have to pay.

    Then again, maybe it doesn't work that way. I don't know.
     
  13. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,819
    Likes Received:
    41,289
    Actually, the first offense penalty is just a warning, I believe. A five game suspension is not handed out until you are a 3rd time offender.
     

Share This Page