1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by rockHEAD, Oct 28, 2001.

  1. rockHEAD

    rockHEAD Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 1999
    Messages:
    10,337
    Likes Received:
    123
    Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds

    19:00 24 October 01
    Jeff Hecht, Boston

    Tests of a controversial weapon that is designed to heat people's skin with a microwave beam have shown that it can disperse crowds. But critics are not convinced the system is safe.

    Last week, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in New Mexico finished testing the system on human volunteers. The Air Force now wants to use this Active Denial Technology (ADT), which it says is non-lethal, for peacekeeping or riot control at "relatively long range" - possibly from low-flying aircraft.

    ADT uses a 2-metre dish to create a narrow beam of microwaves that can be scanned across a crowd or even aimed at individuals. AFRL is using infrared photography to analyse the heating effect on the volunteers' bodies.

    AFRL says that the 3-millimetre wavelength radiation penetrates only 0.3 millimetres into the skin, rapidly heating the surface above the 45 °C pain threshold. At 50 °C, they say the pain reflex makes people pull away automatically in less than a second - it's said to feel like fleetingly touching a hot light bulb. Someone would have to stay in the beam for 250 seconds before it burnt the skin, the lab says, giving "ample margin between intolerable pain and causing a burn".

    more




    crowds??
    I'm thinking, taliban troops? or better yet turn the heat up in a few caves...

    rH
     
  2. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042
    Damn WTF? Frying human beings? I mean I have no problem if used on the Taliban, but I dont think it should be used on regular protestors.
     
  3. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    I thought this weapon was banned after it was used as a popcorn popping-house destroying device.
     
  4. Johnny Rocket

    Johnny Rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2000
    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    0
    I heard about something that uses sound waves to do the same thing. I'll look for a link.
     
  5. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    I mentioned this over a month ago, along with the sonic weapons. The sonic weapons come in two forms: a truck-mounted weapon and a fence. The effects range from nausea and headaches to death (it can crush organs). They've got all sorts of exotic sh*t like this in the works.
     
  6. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,212
    Likes Received:
    15,396
    I believe if you re-check your links, the truck version isn't yet functional. When I first heard of this device it seemed really nasty, but apparently they're pretty solid with not causing perminant harm or death. This is something that not many other 'non-leathal' weapons do. Of course, what happens to the guy with the 'metal pacemaker' or the 'metal plate in his scull'.

    One time I tried to re-heat a Wendys burger in my microwave. Unfortunately, I failed to consider that thin metal film that they put on the wrapper. Best light show I've ever created. Sparks and flames flying everywhere!
     
  7. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Sounds bad.

    But don't you wish they'd had this at Kent State?
     
  8. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261

Share This Page