1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

McGrady, Okafor and the Bobcats

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by laen21, Jun 2, 2004.

  1. laen21

    laen21 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    For those of you who keep pimpin' McGrady to Houston, I have something to say to you. Hell Yeah, T-Mac is a talented player... but is he a top 5 player in this league? If you look hard enough, the answer is no! First of all, Kobe, Shaq, Duncan, Garnett, Dirk, Lebron and yes, even Yao, have just as much if not more upside than McGrady. Who cares if he's been the league leader in scoring each of the last two years... have you seen how many shots he jacks up?! He's just as bad as Iverson if you ask me! The Rockets don't need a ball hog... Yao should and will be "the focus" of this offense as long as he is a Houston Rocket. The Rockets also don't need an injury prone shooting guard who quit on his team last season. I don't care if your team sucks, you don't quit on them! It shows his lack of heart, character and maturity! T-Mac is a great player, but frankly speaking, the Rockets don't need a trigger happy 2 guard. And have you forgotten who our coach is??? Van Gundy will not deal with that crap and you know it.

    My suggestion, don't tinker with this team too much! This time last year, all of us were saying how happy we would be if they made the playoffs. Well, they did just that! None of us really expected them to win it all this year, did we? This is a team of the future... a team that could win it all in 2 or 3 more years when Shaq retires and Duncan gets a little more wear and tear on his body. We have to be patient! I wouldn't mind some changes... like a deeper bench for starters. But I say we should keep Yao, Steve, JJ and boki for sure.

    HOWEVER, If we are going to make a "SPLASH" this summer, the only way to do it is to bring Emeka Okafor home to Houston. Forget about McGrady... he's always hurt and hasn't won a damn thing since he's been in the league. T-Mac says he would stay in Orlando if veteran help is brought in this summer. My proposal, trade up for the #1 pick and take Emeka Okafor. If that means trading Steve, I would do it, but Emeka is the only one I would give up SF3 for. Not even a straight up swap for Brand would make me happy... he's too injury prone and still not enough of a bad ass to hold it down with Garnett, Duncan, Dirk, Zack Randolf.

    Finally, who should the Rockets make available to the Bobcats in the expansion draft? I vote for Pike and A. Griffin.

    Any thoughts???
     
  2. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're asking if we have any thoughts?

    I'd have to say the EXACT SAME thoughts I had in tbui's thread names "McGrady nonsense".
     
  3. dharocks

    dharocks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    9,032
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    Grant Hill and the #1 pick could potentially be had for Mobley, Cato, and Piatkowski... T-Mac did say he wanted a few shooters and a big guy, right? I think Steve is too much to give away for Okafor (who, in my opinion, is the next Theo Ratliff... But then again, Ewing was viewed as purely a defensive specialist when he was drafted too.)
     
  4. white lightning

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2002
    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    742
    Okafor has also missed time with back problems, so we would have to be absolutley certain that there is nothing wrong with his back before we drafted him.
     
  5. travfrancis

    travfrancis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    116
    do yall really think les alexander is going to want any part of grant hill and his contract? i dont think under any circumstance alexander would agree to take on hill's contract and pay 30+ million over the next 2-3 years for a player who isn't going to play, i don't care how rich you are no one wants to spend 30 million dollars on nothing, and if you think grant hill will opt out then think again, not likely

    and this includes t-mac, i don't think any owner will be willing to that
     
  6. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    1) Les loves Grant Hill.
    2) Hill could've come back late last season. Now he's taking a few months off, then more rehab and full contact drills, then training camp? There's a good chance he'll play next season. He won't be great and he won't play much, but he'll probably play.
    3) All indications are that Hill will opt out, unless he actually plays back to his old level, which is unlikely.
    4) Even if he doesn't play, and his contract is for a year while he sits on the bench, I'll take T-Mac thank you.
     
  7. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,609
    Likes Received:
    1,883
    Question for the capologists - how much of the contract could Orlando agree to absord? I recall that NY paid a lot of Rice's contract, and New Jersey paid a lot of Motumbo's contract (or was he outright cut?)

    Also, is there insurance paying back Orlando, if say, Hill played in less than 10 percent of the games? Would this coverage transfer to the Rockets in a trade?

    Just trying to think of ways that the blow could be lessened for Les. If Orlando is going to be out the Hill money, anyway (or not out the money because of an insurance policy), they would still get the benefit of salary cap flexibility from the trade if we used all or part of the trade exception in the deal.
     
  8. Willis25

    Willis25 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,387
    Likes Received:
    31
    les alexander is NOT draten maclane
     
  9. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    4,238
    a.) A team is limited to giving $3 million dollars cash in any one deal. NJ agreed to a buyout with Mutumbo.

    b.) In most cases, teams do have insurance on players. I would assume it transfers, but there's no real resources online to learn the specifics on that.

    PS-
    Sane, how do you know Les loves Grant Hill?
     
  10. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    1. Les does love Grant Hill, but he probably loves $30M more.
    2. Even though he's had time to rest it, Hill will never be the same. He hasn't been able to play on it the last 3 years, I doubt he ever will be able to.
    3. Why would Hill opt out? He's guaranteed the $$ no matter what and no one will take him if he does.

    I'll take Hill for T-Mac, but I doubt Les feels the same way. Hill is one of the biggest burdens in the NBA, ever.
     
  11. wireonfire

    wireonfire Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,665
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hill did play last season and his stats were not too shabby. But his angle was short-lived.
     
  12. KeepKenny

    KeepKenny Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    14
    Zach Randolph? Thank you, thats all i need to know.
     
  13. Mr. Mooch

    Mr. Mooch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,663
    Likes Received:
    3
    Uhh, no he didn't play (unless you meant '02-'03) and let me give all of you Les haters and hypocrites some reading material.

    Monday, August 19, 1996.
    Houston Chronicle Sports page.
    Right-side column - Fran Blinebury.

    HEADLINE: Alexander's bold moves show how to run franchise

    It starts off: MEMO to Drayton McLane Jr.: This is how it's done.

    "...In another bold, dramatic move, Leslie Alexander has shown us he is the only owner in these parts to understand that in this age of inflating player salaries, astronomically rising ticket prices and desires for expensive new sports palaces, the best way to keep the fans interested is to give them plenty of sizzle and a huge cut of the steak."

    YES, SIR
     
    #13 Mr. Mooch, Jun 3, 2004
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2004
  14. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    I said he hasn't played a significant # of games since. He played 29 games last season and you're right, his numbers werent bad.

    But Hill has only played 47 games combined the last 3 seasons!! I just don't see Les paying out 30M for him.
     
  15. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do see T-Mac as a top 5 player.

    And if you look at recent history (Lakers), 2 top 5 players on the same team with good role players will get you alot further than 4 or 5 individual talented players (kings and Mavs).

    I do believe we have the role players in JJ, Cato, Pike, etc.

    Yes, we will have holes to fill. But with the trade exeption and maybe a MLE we can fill those holes, while still having a deep bench.

    However, if taking Hill's contract is part of the deal, count me out. Unless, the #1 pick is included with T-Mac.
     
  16. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't remember if it was Doc or Clutch that told us so a short while back, maybe a couple of weeks ago.

    What I'm 100% sure of is that a reliable source told us that Les loves Grant Hill, otherwise I wouldn't even remember it.
     
  17. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0

    - Hill will never be the same, no one disagreed with that. I'm saying he'll play 25 miutes per game at a decent level. You think Grant Hill would be available if he were playing at his natural level? He will most probably be very capable of playing 25 minutes a game at 70% of his former self. That's perfectly fine.

    - GATER was telling us that everything from Orlando indicates that Hill will opt out. I think this theory would be supported when he's playing for an owner that loves him. GATER, if you're reading, could you remind us where you got that he'd opt out?


    This deal is not about Grant Hill. The deal is about the #1 pick. Grant Hill is the negative that you have to take with the #1 pick. Even if he doesn't play, but opts out in a year, I do this deal. It won't provide us capspace, but it will provide us with cap relief and the only bad contract we'll have left is that of MoT.
     
  18. PXZ

    PXZ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    First of all, we are over the cap. Hill contract would push us to the luxury range and costs Les 40 M ( it is not 30 M in the next three years) PLUS the PENALTY.

    If we did not match Posey's contract because it is 1 M per year more than Les was willing to pay, how in the hell les is willing to pay Hill's 40 M plus another possible 40 M penalty?

    Look, KNicks trade peanuts for Marbury AND Hardaway because of Hardaway's contract. Heck, we trade our No.1 this year to get rid of Rice's one-year contract. Orlando has to pay Les /us a lot more if they ever want to load Hill to us.
     
  19. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    Sane -
    Hill and McGrady have identical contracts. Which is why Weisbrod is pressuring McGrady to sign an extension. Both Hill and TMac have player options for the season after next...2005-06.

    I don't have time to find the (reliable) source right now, but I remember reading that Hill is frustrated that he can't play, feels somewhat guilty for taking the mega-bucks w/o playing and is on record that if he could not play in 2004-05, he would retire. Retiring this coming season forfeits the 2005 POpt. My guess is a google on the Orlando Sentinel would find the information about Hill. Off to work....
     
    #19 GATER, Jun 3, 2004
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2004
  20. ron413

    ron413 Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2002
    Messages:
    3,915
    Likes Received:
    104
    Teams contacting Magic

    GM John Weisbrod said there has been lots of interest in trading for the No. 1 pick in the draft.
    By Brian Schmitz | Sentinel Staff Writer
    Posted June 3, 2004


    As many as a dozen teams have talked to the Orlando Magic about trading for the No. 1 pick in the June 24 draft, including some clubs that have dangled name players for the pick.

    But Magic General Manager John Weisbrod downplays any imminent blockbuster developments, saying, "Everybody is bold now."

    Pulling the trigger on trades is another thing.

    "I've probably talked to 10 or 12 teams about the pick," Weisbrod said. "I don't think there is one team that is any more zealous than another. There's a lot of poker being played."

    Weisbrod has said the Magic could deal the top pick, but he declined to mention the names of recognizable players being offered or the teams offering them. It has been reported that Dallas and the expansion Charlotte Bobcats have called the Magic.

    Weisbrod said the Magic haven't actively shopped the pick but are listening to offers.

    He did agree that Connecticut center Emeka Okafor and Atlanta high school star Dwight Howard are the "consensus" top choices. Both will be brought to Orlando for workouts and interviews after the pre-draft camp, which begins Tuesday in Chicago.

    Weisbrod will make the trip along with Coach Johnny Davis, assistant coach Paul Westhead, director of player personnel Dave Twardzik and director of player development Otis Smith.

    The Magic will explore trade possibilities to see if they can acquire veterans in return. Tracy McGrady doesn't want to rebuild around draft picks and has said he might "have no choice" but to push for a trade if the team can't improve quickly this offseason.

    McGrady even named a few teams last week that he might be interested in, telling the Sentinel that the Houston Rockets appealed to him.

    Weisbrod maintains that discussions with McGrady's agent, Arn Tellem, are "positive."

    Weisbrod said that contrary to the published reports, McGrady's camp has not given the Magic a list of teams he might want to play for next season.

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/spor...4jun03,1,1468374.story?coll=orl-magic','111')

    [​IMG]

    Orlando Magic's Tracy McGrady waves goodbye to the media at the Magic training facility in April. The Magic want to keep McGrady, but are willing to trade him if he wants to go. McGrady, whose seven-year, $93 million contract runs through the 2006-07 season, can opt out of the deal after next season.
    (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
     

Share This Page