1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Loyalty by players, but not by fans?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by roxgirl, Jul 19, 2005.

Tags:
  1. roxgirl

    roxgirl Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just some side thoughts, so don't put too much on it...just for discussion...if it's worth even that.

    How come all season there is all this love for Sura, Wesley, etc. Now it's the offseason, and it's all about who can we get for these people or we need to trade them?

    As fans, we want players to be loyal to the organizations/fans, yet the organizations/fans show no loyalty unless you are a star. Sure, 'tis the way of business, but that doesn't concern us as fans.

    I hear Sura has heart and is a big part of the team we had last year, yet a lot of talk about using him as a bargaining chip. Just one example. All players did their part...minus the obvious ones :p

    I, personally, like the way the team looks RIGHT NOW, with the recent addition of Swift. Unless I have just looked around more, other moves seem like lateral moves to me...correct me if I'm wrong.
     
  2. Beenz

    Beenz Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sura and Wesley were both good players, however in the offseason every team in always looking to improve. Thus, certain players become targeted and in effect certain players become expendable.

    I really liked their games, but for us to win a championship...the rockets backcourt has to be at the level of a Parker/Ginobili or a Billups/Hamilton. Sura/Wesley dont make that cut and are no where near it either.

    Fans would not be upset to have these two guys back, but the main goal this offseason is to get more athletic and younger; thus Wesley and Sura who are both old are the ones who are shown the door first by the fans.
     
  3. blazer_ben

    blazer_ben Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, it's all about Improving the team. if it means trading Wesley will land us a legit PG, you gotta do it. you can be loyal upo a point. end of the day it's a multi million Dollar BUSINESS!!!
     
  4. blazer_ben

    blazer_ben Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well Said!
     
  5. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    There is still love for Sura, Wesley, Mike James, and Juwan, but they all need to be replaced eventually or have their minutes reduced.

    Wesley is old and at times it really shows. He is a decent regular season stopgap, but in the playoffs he was and will be exposed on d.

    Sura is great when healthy, but can we ever count on him for a healthy season? It's been a pretty long time since he's had one, and even though he's a good player, it would be nice to have as many long range shooters out there as possible, and Sura is no shooter.

    Mike James has stated he wants to opt out next year and go to the highest bidder. That's the only reason I'd want to move him if a good deal for him came up. Little too shoot happy for me to want him as anything other than a backup.

    Juwan is getting older, still has a long contract, and is a sieve on d. But his o is good and he is a decent rebounder. Good backup, but another guy I wouldn't mind moving if it was a good deal.

    If opening day comes and these guys are all still on the team I'll root my heart out for them w/o a doubt, but that doesn't mean I don't want the team to improve if possible, and these guys all have their fair share of warts.
     
  6. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Nice post Beenz, I think he did a good job of summing things up. Most of us like Sura and Wesley and what they were able to provide us in such a short time. But the offseason is a time to improve and players have to be moved in order to do so most of the time.
     
  7. Toast

    Toast Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2001
    Messages:
    3,755
    Likes Received:
    10
    Just because a handful of people on this board are pretty vocal about wanting to get rid of this player or that player doesn't mean the whole fanbase has lost its love for the players.


    I'm typically saddened to see any of our boys get traded away. I wish they could ALL contribute to our next championship. General rule of thumb: always root for players who get traded from the team (guys like Stevie who wanted to stay, but management had another directon for the team) and always boo players who leave via free agency to chase $$ (or single handedly destroy our playoff chances and then blame it on your teammates ala Scottie Pippen).
     
  8. Bassfly

    Bassfly Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2002
    Messages:
    970
    Likes Received:
    16
    I agree with you roxgirl. If someone needs to be moved, it shouldnt be Wesley or Sura. Wesley's height was never an issue until he played Stackhouse, and even then, Stackhouse was just making ridiculous fallaway shots. Wesley was the one who always took the toughest assignment so tmac wouldnt ... wesley would hold down wade, iverson and even lebron. Yeah his shooting is streaky and his size isn't what you'd like it to be. He probably isnt best suited as a starter, but for people who just want to throw him out so quicky should read this article:

    http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/rox/3033072

     
  9. tigermission1

    tigermission1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2002
    Messages:
    15,557
    Likes Received:
    17
    Very Mcahiavellian, roxgirl, isn't it? That's just the nature of the beast.
     
  10. Hippieloser

    Hippieloser Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    8,271
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    I don't really want to see Sura or Wesley (mainly Sura) go, and I don't think the Rockets are planning on getting rid of them, either. I think they're targeting Stoudamire for the LLE and could be convinced to part with one of these guys if the perfect deal came along. If Damon can't be wooed for the LLE, I see the Rox standing pat with what they've got to start the season and addressing any dire needs that pop up at the trade deadline.
     
  11. micah1j

    micah1j Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    61
    Actually that is B as in Billions :eek:
     
  12. Furious Jam

    Furious Jam Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    1,606
    When a player signs here for less than market value (like Mo Taylor 1st contract with us) or demands to be traded here (like T-Mac), there should be enormous loyalty for him. And there usually is. For example, MoT was rewarded with a fat 2nd contract even though he blew out his ankle that offseason.

    But when a player has been drafted here, acquired in a trade that he never asked for, or simply signs here for top dollar, then less loyalty is warranted. Those are players who are just under contract and who haven't personally invested themselves in the team or the city.

    I'm not saying that a player needs to make that kind of investment for me to root for him. Most players aren't in a position to do that anyway.

    But my feeling is that a player needs to do something extra, beyond just playing well, to earn loyalty.

    I think that Yao and T-Mac fall into the special category that demands loyalty. Yao is a very special case who could've named his terms when the Rockets were negotiating to get him out of China - he could've easily forced the Rockets to trade his rights if he wasn't interested in Houston. T-Mac pretty much ordered the Magic to send him here.

    As for Swift, if he really could've gotten more from the Hawks or the Hornets, but instead chose to come here and win, then he deserves our loyalty as well.
     
  13. blazer_ben

    blazer_ben Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    0

    True!!. the crazy amount of dollars that the NBA make is Stagaring to say the very Least..... hence loyalty comes second to Success!
     
  14. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,211
    Likes Received:
    9,040
    It is all about performance: if a player plays at a high level and helps the team win, they are a fan favorite. If they don't, their not. Really simple, and at the salaries they are making how else could it be.

    For me, Wesley was a disappointment. He played decent defense, but his offense was streaky, and at times that really hurt, like the playoffs. Sura was one of my favorites, but his health is such an issue. He has great heart, but he often is just dragging his body around.

    If you can't play, you can't stay. It is the nature of the beast. If it were an issue of loyalty, Hakeem would still be playing here and Jordan would still be in Chicago.
     
  15. Jacquescas

    Jacquescas Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    2
    ya teams are trying to win and that means making difficult decisions. Sura laid it out on the line last year. and he got 10 million dollars for it. If he nets us a better player then great. I'm loyal to the rockets organization which has had a host of players since i have beeen a fan which has been most my life 20+ years. As much as i love T-mac if a better trade cam around i'd be the first to help him pack.
     
  16. Willis25

    Willis25 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,387
    Likes Received:
    31
    there is still much love for Sura on this board... he is the X Factor - so don't let the haters bring you down

    Wesley was a nice player, but other than saying "We'll be waiting for you!" on the commercials, I really won't miss him & would love to get a real shooting guard
     
  17. blazer_ben

    blazer_ben Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    0

    The only player i'll even consider trading tracy for are, Duncan or maybe LBJ. otherwise, i see no better offer in the in the very near Future.
     
  18. Xerobull

    Xerobull ...and I'm all out of bubblegum
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    36,905
    Likes Received:
    35,776
    In my heart, RG, I tend to agree. In my head, though- the needs of the group superscedes the needs of the few.

    I would be sad to see Sura, Wesley, and Barry go, and to a lesser extent, James, etc. I was immensely sad to see Francis and Cat go last summer. I was and still am a big fan of these guys. But it made our team so much better. We should have won the first round, and even though we didn't, we did better than we did in the previous year's playoffs.

    Bottom line is that it's no shame to upgrade your team. It's sad, but it's like that cliche' that you hear from players who get traded: 'It's a business'

    J
     
  19. dharocks

    dharocks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    9,032
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    There are three guys I really want back; Sura, Barry, and Deke. I'd be interested in having Ward back just because he's supposedly a good influence on young guys, and would be good mentor for Head (just to show him how to be a professional).

    James, Spoon, Mooch, Baker, Wesley... None of those guys were really essential to our chemistry last year (Moochie was a nice cheerleader, but what does that mean if you never play?), and if we can find upgrades at their positions, we should make them.

    But Sura, Barry, and Dikembe make for a very nice bench, and they're great chemistry guys. ESPECIALLY Sura. He's still our only real mean, tough guy. And he can play.
     
  20. Jeff

    Jeff Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    22,412
    Likes Received:
    362
    You know, I totally agree about loyalty. I understand the nature of the business and I have no problem making trades if they improve the team, but it does seem quite often like fans get pissed when a player looks elsewhere for money or other reasons, but they are willing to kick him to the curb if it means making the team better.

    Pretty hypocritical.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now