1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Kerry in the WSJ: My economic plan

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Sep 15, 2004.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    30,698
    Likes Received:
    7,175
    no mention of Vietnam, but he couldn't resist the gratuitous John McCain reference.

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005623

    --
    My Economic Policy
    A new CEO in Washington would be good for American business.

    BY JOHN KERRY
    September 15, 2004

    As I travel across this country, I meet store owners, stock traders, factory foremen and optimistic entrepreneurs. Their experiences may be different, but they all agree that America can do better under an administration that is better for business. Business leaders like Warren Buffett, Lee Iacocca and Robert Rubin are joining my campaign because they believe that American businesses will do better if we change our CEO.

    Since January 2001, the economy has lost 1.6 million private-sector jobs. The typical family has seen its income fall more than $1,500, while health costs are up more than $3,500.

    Today, American companies are investing less and exporting less than they were in 2000--the first time investment and exports have been down during any presidential term in over 70 years. At the same time, our trade deficit has grown to more than 5% of the economy for the first time ever, a troublesome and unsustainable development.

    The economy still has not turned the corner. Over the last year, real wages are still down and even the jobs created in the past 12 months represent the worst job performance for this period of a recovery in over 50 years. Indeed, the total of 1.7 million jobs created over the last year is weaker than even the worst year of job creation under President Clinton, and below what is needed just to find jobs for new applicants entering the work force.

    Forty-three months into his presidency, George Bush's main explanation for this dismal economic record is an assortment of blame and excuses. Yet what President Bush cannot explain is how the last 11 presidents before him--Democrats and Republicans--faced wars, recessions and international crises, and yet only he has presided over lost jobs, declining real exports, and the swing from a $5.6 trillion surplus to trillions of dollars of deficits.

    While the private sector will always be America's engine for innovation and job creation, President Bush has failed to take any responsibility for missing opportunities to strengthen the conditions for investment, economic confidence and job creation.

    When the economy needed short-run stimulus without increasing the long-run deficit, President Bush got it backwards, passing an initial round of tax cuts that Economy.com found had no effect in lifting us out of recession. He then passed more deficit-increasing tax cuts that Goldman Sachs described as "especially ineffective as a stimulative measure." When small businesses and families needed relief from skyrocketing health-care and energy costs, he chose sweetheart deals for special interests over serious plans to reduce costs and help spur new job creation.

    With the right choices on the economy, America can do better. American businesses and workers are the most resilient, productive and innovative in the world. And they deserve policies that are better for our economy. My economic plan will do the following: (1) Create good jobs, (2) cut middle-class taxes and health-care costs, (3) restore America's competitive edge, and (4) cut the deficit and restore economic confidence.

    • Create good jobs. I strongly believe that America must engage in the global economy, and I voted for trade opening from Nafta to the WTO. But at the same time, I have always believed that we need to fight for a level playing field for America's workers.

    I am not trying to stop all outsourcing, but as president, I will end every single incentive that encourages companies to outsource. Today, taxpayers spend $12 billion a year to subsidize the export of jobs. If a company is trying to choose between building a factory in Michigan or Malaysia, our tax code actually encourages it to locate in Asia.

    My plan would take the entire $12 billion we save from closing these loopholes each year and use it to cut corporate tax rates by 5%. This will provide a tax cut for 99% of taxpaying corporations. This would be the most sweeping reform and simplification of international taxation in over 40 years. In addition, I have proposed a two-year new jobs tax credit to encourage manufacturers, other businesses affected by outsourcing, and small businesses that created jobs.

    American businesses are the most competitive in the world, yet when it comes to enforcing trade agreements the Bush administration refuses to show our competitors that we mean business. They have brought only one WTO case for every three brought by the Clinton administration, while cutting trade enforcement budgets and failing to stand up to China's illegal currency manipulation. That not only costs jobs, it threatens to erode support for open markets and a growing global economy.

    • Cut middle-class taxes and health costs. Families are being increasingly squeezed by falling incomes and rising costs for everything from health care to college. But spiraling health-care and energy costs squeeze businesses too, encouraging them to lay off workers and shift to part-time and temporary workers.

    Under my plan, the tax cuts would be extended and made permanent for 98% of Americans. In addition, I support new tax cuts for college, child care and health care--in total, more than twice as large as the new tax cuts President Bush is proposing.

    I have proposed a health plan that would increase coverage while cutting costs. It builds on and strengthens the current system, giving patients their choice of doctors, and providing new incentives instead of imposing new mandates.

    My health plan will offer businesses immediate relief on their premiums. By providing employers some relief on catastrophic costs that are driving up premiums for everyone, we will save employers and workers about 10% of total health premiums.

    Our hospitals and doctors have the best technology for saving lives, but often still rely on pencil and paper when it comes to tracking medical tests and billing. As a result, we spend over $350 billion a year on red tape, not to mention the cost of performing duplicative or redundant tests. My plan will modernize our information technology, create private electronic medical records, and create incentives for the adoption of the latest disease management.

    And I won't be afraid to take on prescription drug or medical malpractice costs. We will make it easier for generic drugs to come to market and allow the safe importation of pharmaceuticals from countries like Canada. Finally, we will require medical malpractice plaintiffs to try nonbinding mediation, oppose unjustified punitive damage awards and penalize lawyers who file frivolous suits with a tough "three strikes and you're out" rule.

    This plan will make our businesses more competitive by making our health care more affordable.

    • Restore America's competitive edge. America has fallen to 10th in the world in broadband technology. Some of our best scientists are being encouraged to work overseas because of the restrictions on federal funding for stem-cell research. President Bush has proposed cutting 21 of the 24 research areas that are so critical to long-term growth. We need to invest in research because when we shortchange research we shortchange our future.

    My plan would invest in basic research and end the ban on stem-cell research. It would invest more in energy research, including clean coal, hydrogen and other alternative fuels. It would boost funding at the National Science Foundation and continue increases at the National Institutes of Health and other government research labs. It will provide tax credits to help jumpstart broadband in rural areas and the new higher-speed broadband that has the potential to transform everything from e-government to tele-medicine. I would promote private-sector innovation policies, including the elimination of capital gains for long-term investments in small business start-ups.

    To ensure we have the workers to compete in an innovation economy, we need more young people to not only enter but complete college, we need more young women and minorities to enter the fields of math and science, and we need to make it easier for working parents to get the lifelong learning opportunities they need to excel at both their current and their future jobs.

    • Cut the deficit and restore economic confidence. When President Bush was in New York for the Republican convention, he did not even pay lip service to reducing the deficit. His record makes even Republicans wary. From missions to Mars to a pricey Medicare bill, President Bush has proposed or passed more than $6 trillion in initiatives without paying for any of them. The record is clear: A deficit reduction promise from George W. Bush is not exactly a gilt-edged bond.

    Americans can trust my promise to cut the deficit because my record backs up my word. When I first joined the Senate, I broke with my own party to support the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit reduction plan, which President Reagan signed into law. In 1993, I cast a deciding vote to bring the deficit under control. And in 1997, I supported the bipartisan balanced budget agreement.

    I will restore fiscal discipline and cut the deficit in half in four years. First, by imposing caps, so that discretionary spending--outside of security and education--does not grow faster than inflation. If Congress cannot control spending, it will automatically be cut across the board. Second, I will reinstitute the "pay as you go" rule, which requires that no one propose or pass a new program without a way to pay for it. Third, I will ask for Congress to grant me a constitutionally acceptable version of line-item veto power and to establish a commission to eliminate corporate welfare like the one John McCain and I have fought for.

    I am not waiting for next year to change the tone on fiscal discipline. Every day on the campaign trail, I explain how I pay for all my proposals. By rolling back the recent Bush tax cuts for families making over $200,000 per year, we can pay for health care and education. By cutting subsidies to banks that make student loans and restoring the principle that "polluters pay," we can afford to invest in national service and new energy technologies. My new rules won't just apply to programs I don't like; they will apply to my own priorities as well.

    Cleaning up President Bush's fiscal mess will not be easy, but to ensure a strong and sustainable economic future we have to make the tough choices to move America's growing deficits back in the right direction.

    On Nov. 2 we will have a national shareholders meeting. On the ballot will be the choice to continue with President Bush's policies or return to the fiscal sanity and pro-growth polices that proved so successful in the 1990s. You will choose.

    Mr. Kerry is the Democratic Party's candidate for president.
     
  2. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    30,710
    Likes Received:
    17,748
    Mr. Kerry is the Democratic Party's candidate for president.

    Hmmm. Methinks the WSJ must have thought its readers needed this gentle reminder.

    basso, you can shout it out to the world that you now know Kerry is running on well defined issues.
     
  3. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    This is a good start by kerry now let's see if he can stay on tract by pushing this thru ads and the debates.

    Can anyone explain how his deficit cutting plan compares vs. Bthis years budget? Seems like to me a good part of the deficit is defense spending which Kerry says won't be capped. So has any spending other than defense or education dramatically increased (basically if Bush had the same plan in place would it have made a difference to the deficit).

    Honestly this is good stuff (I don't agree with all of it) and good to see kerry is finally getting a bit more specific.
     
  4. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,627
    Likes Received:
    5,682
    Oh good Lord, this is just insane. Swing and a miss on all issues. It is small wonder that Wall Street is cheering Bush's gigantic leap forward in the polls. When I have more time I will come back and disect Kerry's incredibly WRONG policies.
     
  5. nyquil82

    nyquil82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,174
    Likes Received:
    3
    sure, sure you will. its much easier to debate against someone when you know they won't debate back, huh? that way you can utter some ultimatum's and conclude your thesis of saying you're right and Kerry hung out with Fonda.
     
  6. Mulder

    Mulder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    7,118
    Likes Received:
    81
    tick tock tick tock T_J... we're still waiting for your in depth analysis.
     
  7. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    56,885
    Likes Received:
    39,252
    Don't hold your breath... we wouldn't want you to croak.
     
  8. halfbreed

    halfbreed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,157
    Likes Received:
    26
    The problem with that is the bottom 5-10% of Americans pay NO income taxes. So how can John Kerry say that his cuts will reach to 98%? You can't pay any less than zero.
     
  9. buddry

    buddry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think he plans on handing out more money to those people.
     
  10. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,642
    As a senator, has Kerry ever tried to implement any of these changes? If so, what has been the result? If not, why not? If they are good ideas, why not propose them before he makes a run at president?
     
  11. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    494
    His "analysis," should it materialize, will be filled with as much substance as his response to my challenge for a debate.
     
  12. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    494
    He did point out several things along the lines of what he has proposed that he implemented while in the Senate. In addition, the proposals he makes here are those that a Senator could not push through, particularly with a GOP controlled Congress.

    Can you point out any proposals that appear wrong?

    Can you point out anything that shows that Bush's "plan" for America is better?

    Kerry hit a home run with this editorial. No wonder t_j went on the defensive.
     
  13. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    Andy the biggest problem is pretty simple. Liberals have been saying all along that cutting taxes in times of war is bad, now Kerry is simply taxing the wealthy more but passing out the savings to selected groups.

    His plan for paying down the deficit is by capping the budget EXCEPT for defense and education. Ummm, we have a large deficit largely because of the war.

    So again he wants to campaign that the deficit is a very bad thing. If you want to take a chunk out of the deficit well he has to raise taxes and/or cutting defense spending. Neither is popular. But if he wants to campaign on the deficit he has to tackle taxes and defense. He didn't.
     
  14. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,627
    Likes Received:
    5,682
    It's rare that andymoon posts without mentioning my name. Is there greater evidence of ownership? This man is obsessed with The_Conquistador.


    btw -- it's funny how he believes there to be a need for a debate. I've utterly shamed him in every interaction over the past two years. Just look at his level of frustration. Now he things that the slate can be wiped clean and he can best me in a debate? Sorry pal, you had your chance. You lost. Big. Debate some people in the Hangout, then you might be able to run with the big dogs.
     
  15. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    494
    Cutting taxes in wartime IS wrong. Instead, Bush has executed massive giveaways to the rich while supporting policies that raise the costs of healthcare, reduce salaries for workers, and generally raise costs all the way around. Now, Kerry will cut out those massive giveaways in order to restore some fiscal sanity to the White House.

    BTW, he is not "passing out the savings to selected groups," he is using that money to reduce the deficit. As he said in the article, he isn't increasing the tax cuts for 98% of Americans, he is just making those cuts permanent for the little guy.

    And he specifically said that he will not skimp on defense spending, which is but one component of the budget picture. In addition, he has said he will pursue cooperation with allies to include increased worldwide funding for the debacle in Iraq, which will take some of the financial burden from us.

    He DID!!! He is going to repeal the tax cuts that affect only the wealthiest Americans (capital gains tax, dividend tax, estate tax) and will encourage more cooperation in Iraq from the international community, particularly when it comes to paying those bills. He tackled BOTH of the things you claim he didn't, which clearly shows your lack of perspective.
     
  16. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    494
    t_j

    You, sir, have a yellow streak the size of the Pacific Ocean. I believe that my son could out debate you by banging his teething ring against the keyboard, but the offer is open for you to prove me wrong. I laid out the parameters, I offered to stack the deck in your favor, and I threw down the gauntlet.

    You are the one that ran away.
     
  17. Mulder

    Mulder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    7,118
    Likes Received:
    81
    Still waiting for your in depth analysis, t_j...

    [​IMG]
     
  18. bnb

    bnb Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,992
    Likes Received:
    315
    Sorry Andy...

    you must have much more perspective on Johnny's plan than i have. I see him continuing to say what everyone wants to hear. We'll lower taxes, increase spending and reduce the deficit!! Kapayaa!

    So..taxes cuts in a time of war are bad...but i'll cut taxes for the middle class (98%!!! of taxpayers). I'll see the Bush cuts and raise you credits for college, childcare and healthcare. In other words, tax cuts for the other guy are bad, but for you, my friend, i'll sweeten the pot. (Oh...and more extensive health coverage, but it'll cost a whole bunch less).

    And corporate taxes -- I'll lower those too -- part of the whole deficit fighting plan, i suppose. Of course 'loopholes' would be closed to 'pay' for it. I'd like to know just what those loopholes are??? I expect some exist -- but too often what I may consider a legit deduction, you probably consider a loophole. I suppose it all comes down to who's bill it's on. Them big guys aren't paying their share -- so i'll tax them more and transfer it all to you.

    And we'd stop the deficit, ...but no cuts to defense and education. Heaven forbid someone think we're yeller. Nope -- George is shovelling too much money to the defense industries, but please don't label me 'weak on defense.' We be real tough. More hawkish, really. Possibly spend even more. Just we'd get France and Germany to pony up too!

    Ugh!

    I would have so much more respect for him if he'd come out and say oll' George had messed things up sooo bad there was no room for additional cuts at this time. America, it's time we got our house in order! And i'm the man to do it.

    Leadership! Gumption!. Instead, i keep thinking each speech must have been proofed by every conceivable demographic to ensure no one is offended. He seems so scared of losing votes, he's having a hard time attracting them.

    If George wasn't such a boob, it would be mildly amusing. As it stands, i'm hoping someone slaps some life into him soon. Can't we draft Martin Sheen or Dennis Hasbert or something????
     
  19. 4chuckie

    4chuckie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    2
    "Under my plan, the tax cuts would be extended and made permanent for 98% of Americans. In addition, I support new tax cuts for college, child care and health care--in total, more than twice as large as the new tax cuts President Bush is proposing."

    Andy-

    So he's raising taxes and redistributing he's not paying down the deficit.

    As bnb just mentioned Kerry is being a candy ass and trying to make everyone happy. problem is everyone will see through it. He has some decent ideas but you can't increase defense spending, not raise taxes and lower the deficit. The math doesn't work.
     
  20. bnb

    bnb Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,992
    Likes Received:
    315
    Bush showed that to be true ;)
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now