1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Jim Jackson to Cleveland

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Beck, Jan 2, 2001.

  1. Beck

    Beck Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    15
    Just heard it on the radio...

    Jim Jackson, Larry Robinson, and Anthony Johnson to Cleveland for Brevin Knight

    I don't think the Rox had much interest in J Jax, but I thought I would throw it out there.

    ------------------
    - Beck

    Dream...bring back the goggles
     
  2. countingcrow

    countingcrow Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2000
    Messages:
    2,582
    Likes Received:
    25
    Exceptional trade for the Hawks. Brevin Knight is in the first year of a 4-year $20 million dollar contract. When Knight has started, he has done very well and would have been starting for Cleveland if not for Miller. He has a relatively inexpensive contract for a more-than-capable starting PG.

    With Jason Terry playing SG lately, Brevin Knight is a welcome addition and Atlanta will now have one of the quickest backcourts in the NBA. Plus, Knight assist-to-turnover ratio is very good. Not to mention, they were able to lay waste to Larry Robinson and Anthony Johnson, who they had no interest in keeping.

    Cleveland did pretty well in this trade also. It is obvious that the Cavs have been shopping Wesley Person around the league, but he must not be receiving any attention. Jim Jackson is a nice SG who thrives in an isolation-oriented offense. That is not to say that he can't play in other offenses. He has a nice shooting touch and his penetration skills are top-notch. Langdon will serve as the backup with Harpring subbing for SG and SF.

    With all sides considered, this trade filled both teams' needs admirably.

    ------------------
     
  3. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    A good trade for both teams for the reasons already mentioned. Another plus for the Cavs is that JJ's contract ends this season. In some respects, the Cavs are "auditioning" Jackson somewhat like the Rockets are Mo T.


    ------------------
    GATER
     
  4. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,057
    Likes Received:
    15,230
  5. moestavern19

    moestavern19 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 1999
    Messages:
    39,003
    Likes Received:
    3,641
    Yeah you cant have Knight and Miller , good trade for Cavs

    ------------------
    "Its a good thing they don't make posters of European players"

    -Walt Williams after getting "posterized" by Zan Tabak .
     
  6. SamCassell

    SamCassell Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    9,517
    Likes Received:
    2,377
    Cleveland got robbed. Jackson is injury-prone and nothing special as a SG. Knight is at least a solid PG who plays pretty good defense. And this frees things up for Terry play the 2 full time.

    ------------------
    "Thirty-seven?" -Randall, Clerks
    www.clutchtown.com
     
  7. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    Jim Jackson tonight - 7pts, 6 TO's in 34 minutes.

    Meanwhile Chris Mihm had 18pts and 15 rebounds(8 off). Lokks like he's making the most of his opportunity to start.

    ------------------
     
  8. Hobbs

    Hobbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    7
    I must disagree strongly with the sentiment here.

    Cleveland stole a decent player. Jackson will help them this season and they'll get salary relief (not as good as cap room, but they'll save some dough) after this season.

    Knight's not in the greatest health. Even assuming he comes back healthy, Atlanta now has the smallest starting PG and SG in the NBA (or something close to it). That is not a good combination. They're asking to be dominated every single game in the post. Expect huge foul problems for Terry and Knight. They are not a good combo.

    ------------------


    [This message has been edited by Hobbs (edited January 03, 2001).]
     

Share This Page